Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,541   Posts: 1,572,772   Online: 881
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Olympus OM-2n

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    105

    Olympus OM-2n

    Hi guys!
    I never had any Olympus cameras in my life!...Now I could buy an Olympus OM-2n (with a Zuiko 50 mm 1.4) for a good price (60 euro).
    I'd like to know if this model is a good camera.
    actually I'm using a Canon F-1 new:is the Olympus at the same livel?

    Other question: Did Olympus make some professional camera (respected by professional users)?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    erikg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    pawtucket rhode island usa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,433

    Olympus OM-2n

    Short answer: great price. Yes. Yes, but different. Yes, all single digit OMs are pro models.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Central Florida, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,022
    I can't compare with Canon because I've never used one.

    Compared to just about everything else Japanese made, Olympus is a simple camera. Simple in a good way that is. It does what it is designed to do and does it very well in a small package. When OM-2 was new, it was a top of the line camera body. It incorporated aperture priority exposure scheme as well as manual. OM-1 (fully manual) and OM-10 (low cost amateur model) was its family of cameras.

    As far as I know, Olympus just made one line of lens for all users, amateurs and pros. I *think* adoption by pros were relatively lower compared to Nikons and Canons but I don't have any statistics to back that up. I recall hearing somewhere, most newspaper guys used Nikon or Canon back then.

    Back when these cameras were available new, I was in Japan and I owned an OM10. A very fine camera. I couldn't afford anything better back then and I wished I could have had an OM1 or 2.

    One thing I really like about these older Olympus was that they had a shutter speed ring right where the lens mounts, and of course the aperture is somewhere on the lens itself. One could adjust one or the other by simply sliding hand just a little. A very elegant design, I thought.

    If you can have one at reasonable price, I would highly recommend it. Because its off people's favorite list, lenses can be had for much less than say Nikon or Canon. That's a plus.
    Last edited by tkamiya; 10-30-2012 at 10:22 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    Develop, stop, fix.... wait.... where's my film?

  4. #4
    nsurit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Texas Hill Country
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,316
    Images
    18
    Great camera. Don't expect huge price breaks on the faster lenses. Olympus made great glass. You will not be disappointed with the results. As you know the OMs are a good bit smaller/lighter than your F1-new. Theyare also very well made cameras. Bill Barber

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    410
    The only serious complaint I've read about the single digit OMs is that some have a problem "eating" batteries, you might want to look into this and see if the one you are interested in has been modified...sorry I can't help as I'm not an OM fan.
    Also another minus is the OMs will not take a M42 adapter so you can't use all those lovely screw lenses.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    531
    Images
    133
    Quote Originally Posted by Excalibur2 View Post
    The only serious complaint I've read about the single digit OMs is that some have a problem "eating" batteries,
    This is only true for OM-2sp and OM4.

    The cameras were professionally used mainly in a scientific environment. Olympus is a manufacturer of high precision optics (microscopes, endoscopes and the like) in the first place. With all such gear the cameras were used for documentation purposes.

  7. #7
    mr rusty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    lancashire, UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    637
    Images
    106
    The lens alone is worth close to €60 (the way zuiko glass is going up). OMs are great cameras. watch for sticky foams and light seals (as all older kit), and particularly on OMs get the foam that was installed under the top cover on top of the prism removed, as it eventually eats the prism silvering. Otherwise a CLA and prob then good for many years. I have 4 OMs that I use regularly.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN US
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,345
    Images
    5
    As noted above, many OMs have foam on top of the prism that deteriorates with age and eats through the prism silvering. If this has happened, you'll notice dark "wisps" or threads as you look through the viewfinder.
    "Far more critical than what we know or do not know is what we do not want to know." - Eric Hoffer

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    62

    Olympus OM-2n

    I am just repeating what everyone has said, but welcome on board! The only downside is one more person to battle for OM gear with on eBay and such, haha. I should just be selfish and say 'don't do it, OMs suck' but I can't lie!!

    As you have read, the 2n is great as are most of the single digit OMs. The ones that can eat batteries have been noted. The OM1 was set up for mercury batteries so that needs to be taken into consideration. Lots of options for that but I am doing the low rent option of a hearing aid battery and a wad of tinfoil;-)

    I also have my original OM2 from back in the day. It needs its foam replaced in the prism before any more flecks appear on the viewfinder. Really I do not see a huge difference between the 2 and the 2n. I know there are ones. I got a 2n just because I knew it would be newer.

    I have never tried the 2sp or the 3 or 4. I may someday but to me the 1 and. 2/2n are what I gravitate to. Some people speculate that the 3 and 4 may be harder to keep running for a long time as they have more electronics.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mission Viejo, California
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    1,487
    At least the OM-3, like the OM-1 can keep running for a long, long time. Batteries and electronics are only for the meters in these beauties.

    After 37 years owning OM-1's I got my first OM-2(n) earlier this year and it is a sweetheart of a camera. Just so smooth and quiet. Very simple and elegant.

    I now have OM-1/2/2S/3/4t/10/40 cameras and the OM-1 will always be my favorite with the OM-2 just a half-step behind.

    And with my recent vision impairments, the OM-2 is my go-to since I can't really read the meters anymore.
    - Bill Lynch

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin