Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,234   Posts: 1,532,936   Online: 989
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    darkosaric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,663

    New Elmar-M 50mm 2.8 question

    Hi,

    I have a chance to get black Elmar-M for relatively cheap price . As I already have summicron 50 type 3 - I am wondering about difference in character of those two lenses. Are they too similar, or it is worth to get Elmar-M as well?

    thanks,

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Athens Greece
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    71
    One thing I can tell you for sure is that I sold my black Elmar-M 50/2.8 to buy a Summicron type-3 50/2 just to earn this extra stop.
    Now I am sure that I made a mistake. Elmar is a great performer, very "Leica", compact and very fast focusing. I always had my M6 in my pocket, now I can't.
    I can't really find a disadvantage to Summicron but I just never "felt in love" with it.
    The only drawback about Elmar-M is the flimsy apperture ring but not a big deal
    Last edited by antmar; 11-21-2012 at 05:39 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    654
    Images
    15
    Go for it!
    Elmar 50 ƒ/2.8 got more character for B&W than Summicron 50 ƒ/2.
    Sonnar 50 ƒ/1.5 got more character for B&W and for color than Summicron 50 ƒ/2.

  4. #4
    darkosaric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,663
    I do only B&W - so I will go for it .
    I have Industar 50/3.5 collapsible - and with that lens my M camera becomes pocketable. Industar is a good lens, but not excellent; I always think it is better to bring summicron. So I think elmar-M will be winning combo.
    Last edited by darkosaric; 11-21-2012 at 08:19 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  5. #5
    SFC
    SFC is offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Ashland, OR
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    25
    I had and sold an Elmar-M 2.8. It was a decent lens but one thing drove me nuts: When extended, the focus was quite stiff. Something about the extension/locking that caused binding. I would make sure the one you're looking at doesn't have this. Other than that, a decent performer with very little distortion.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    654
    Images
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by SFC View Post
    I had and sold an Elmar-M 2.8. It was a decent lens but one thing drove me nuts: When extended, the focus was quite stiff. Something about the extension/locking that caused binding. I would make sure the one you're looking at doesn't have this. Other than that, a decent performer with very little distortion.
    The black Elmar 50 ƒ/2.8 is pretty recent to have gummed helical lubricants etc. etc.
    Perhaps You are referring to the 50's vintage or frankensteined lens?
    The extension/rotate/lock is supposed to be reasonably tight, its like that on all collapsible lenses M or LTM. The "tail" wings are adjustable with a tool.

  7. #7
    darkosaric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,663
    Quote Originally Posted by georg16nik View Post
    Perhaps You are referring to the 50's vintage or frankensteined lens?
    I am thinking about new black Elmar-M, this example that I can get is from 1999.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    654
    Images
    15
    I know, darkosaric, the black Elmar is recent.
    Quote Originally Posted by darkosaric View Post
    I am thinking about new black Elmar-M, this example that I can get is from 1999.
    I was referring:
    Quote Originally Posted by SFC View Post
    I had and sold an Elmar-M 2.8. It was a decent lens but one thing drove me nuts: When extended, the focus was quite stiff. Something about the extension/locking that caused binding...

  9. #9
    darkosaric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,663
    Thanks Georg, my bad

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    123
    Love mine. It seems to be the one Leica lens I always hold onto. Mine is chrome. Fast and smooth focus.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin