I don't understand why they put up an opinion article from a guy that has only ever owned one lens. Not that you have to own them all in order to have an opinion, but why should I care about this guy's perspective on the subject?
It is amusing to note that the writer of the article has come to the startling conclusion what generations of 35mm photographers have known all along. I have considered the 35mm focal length to be my normal lens and actually have two of the f:2 Nikon variety of this focal length. It is also interesting that he does't even shoot film, only digital.
I am not losing sleep over the possibility of prices rising in analog gear as I have more than I need at this time ;-).