Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,197   Posts: 1,531,403   Online: 907
      
Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 73
  1. #61
    Ed Sukach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,520
    Images
    26
    My Olympus OM-4. "The most sophisticated exposure meter they ever built a camera around!"
    Carpe erratum!!

    Ed Sukach, FFP.

  2. #62
    panchromatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Lansdale, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    218
    Images
    3
    If you can stand the size go the the Nikon F100, if not the N80 is a nice piece.



    Though i'm in love with the F6
    --Ryan

    "The negative is the equivalent of the composer's score, and the print the performance." ~Ansel Adams

  3. #63

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Stavanger or Trondheim, Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    771
    Images
    24
    Another vote for the Contax G2. I sold my Nikon N80 and a heap of lenses after buying the G2, on the grounds that a 35 mm is for travelling light. For travelling heavy I prefer my 645 or 5x4 (and perhaps a llama to carry it !)

  4. #64
    Mongo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete H
    I sold my Nikon N80 and a heap of lenses after buying the G2, on the grounds that a 35 mm is for travelling light.
    I kept my FE2 and all of the bits and pieces that go with it...but only because there are some things that an SLR is just better at. Macro work being the most obvious example (and I love to do macro work....). But I haven't actually taken the FE2 out of the house since I got the G...all of my macro work lately has been in the "studio" (i.e., in my attic), using either the FE2 or an LF camera.

    I wonder if the FE2 misses the great outdoors.
    Film is cheap. Opportunities are priceless.

  5. #65
    roteague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,672
    Images
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by waynecrider
    The metering isn't spot, but I've never had a problem and I do use a handheld sometimes.
    I'm not sure what you mean. There are 5 five Spot meters corresponding to the AF sensors.
    Robert M. Teague
    www.visionlandscapes.com
    www.apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=2235

    "A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist" -- Louis Nizer

  6. #66

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Floriduh
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,266
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by roteague
    I'm not sure what you mean. There are 5 five Spot meters corresponding to the AF sensors.
    I was referring to the FTBn which has centerweighted metering.

  7. #67
    roteague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,672
    Images
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by waynecrider
    I was referring to the FTBn which has centerweighted metering.
    Sorry, I misunderstood your post. I have an old Nikon F2, which I haven't used in years but just can't seem to part with. I pulled it out the other day and found the shutter is frozen. So, I'm not sure what to do with it - fix it, or make it a paperweight. It's not about the cost, more about the sentiment.
    Robert M. Teague
    www.visionlandscapes.com
    www.apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=2235

    "A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist" -- Louis Nizer

  8. #68
    Flotsam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    S.E. New York State
    Posts
    3,221
    Images
    13
    I like all my 35s but although I haven't used it in a long time, I just had my Contax RTS II CLA'd and Wow, that is a great camera. All the features that I want in a camera (except for interchangable viewfinders) and none that I don't. Aesthetically, it is gorgeous, body sculpted by the Porschia design group who apparently didn't know or care about normal 35mm camera design conventions and put the controls all bass ackwards but it sure is beautiful. IMHO they could have stopped "improving" on SLRs at that point. After that, plastic bodies, Autofocus, super multimode program fuzzy logic matrix auto exposure, LCD screens and the extinction of thumb levers took over. Mine has a motordrive and a 12 AA cell battery pack that allows it to do double duty as a ship's anchor in a pinch.
    The dream camera for an old goat.
    That is called grain. It is supposed to be there.
    =Neal W.=

  9. #69
    Jeffrey A. Steinberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Scarsdale, NY
    Posts
    296
    I vote for the Nikon FM3A. Just a great camera. Works without batteries (not in auto mode, clearly), is light and a joy to use with the MD-12. You can't go wrong there and all the buttons are in the right spot. I don't think it has AE-lock but you can create your own with manual setting once you know what you want (or you can get at it through exposure compensation). Not as elegant as AE-Lock.

    The other suggestion is just a good old fashion Nikon F2. They really don't built it like that anymore. The FM3A is a modern version but even that is not of the same build quality. I got a used F2-AS (DP12) and its great. If you use a meter separately, you can ditch the heavy DP-12 and put the DE-1 prism on top and its even lights.

    Either of these will serve you well with proper care for the next 20+ years.

    Let me know what you decide. I loved your question.

    --Jeffrey
    --Jeffrey

    ______________________________________________
    Jeffrey Steinberg, K2MIT
    Scarsdale, NY

    www.jsteinbergphoto.com (my avocation)
    www.reversis.com (my vocation)

  10. #70

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Sarajevo
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,801
    Nicole, I am shooting with Canon EOS 3 and EOS 500n.

    But, if I had enough money, I would love to buy Leica, and especially Leica M6 or M7. Small, quiet, optics is great, and metering is enough for b/w negatives. And as you said you have handheld meter, it is not an issue.

    I personally use older than me Konica Auto S2 rangefinder, and hope to collect money for Leica M...

    Other rangefinders: Voightlaender Bessa R2, and if you have money Konica RF or Contax G1 or G2. Last two are automated rangefinders, Konica can use Leica M lenses, and Contax use Carz Zeiss...

    Of course, if you are more for SLR and auto focus or autoexposure, then... I am shooting Canon, so I know only those cameras. Maybe something like EOS 30 or 33, Or even EOS 300 if money is issue?

    If you are for SLR, but can live without autofocus, what about Contax Aria? Small (compared with EOS3), well built (as I heard), Carl Zeiss optics... In Germany it can be bought for 400 EURO... without lenses of course.

    Olympus OM1, OM2, OM4... Zuiko lenses are great, I tried one

    And good old Nikon F2 and something like that is seriously to think about...

    OK, now I am of no help at all

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin