Switch to English Language Passer en langue franšaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,226   Posts: 1,532,671   Online: 803
      
Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 75

Thread: 50mm lenses

  1. #61

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Adirondacks
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,367
    Quote Originally Posted by jjphoto View Post
    If you want to try a cheap 50, $10-20, that does have a little character you could try the Industar 50-2 (50mm F3.5) in M42. Being M42 you can probably use it on a camera that you already have with a suitable adapter. It's a tiny lens.



    It's a pain to use as the aperture is on the front of the lens and it's almost impossible to change aperture without accidentally changing focus at the same time. That's assuming you would ever stop down of course being plenty sharp wide open.
    I've been curious about this lens for a while, having acquired some screwmount bodies.

  2. #62
    jjphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    130
    There's no reason to be curious, being so cheap and abundant, just get one and throw it away if you don't like it. Here in Australia a packet of cigarettes costs more!

    My M42 adapter cost more than the lens.

  3. #63

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Adirondacks
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,367
    Quote Originally Posted by jjphoto View Post
    There's no reason to be curious, being so cheap and abundant, just get one and throw it away if you don't like it. Here in Australia a packet of cigarettes costs more!

    My M42 adapter cost more than the lens.
    Jj, I don't even buy garbage bags to throw away. I hardly even have garbage!
    Plus I don't smoke.
    It sound like you think highly of it. Can you show some examples?

  4. #64
    jjphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by E. von Hoegh View Post
    Jj, I don't even buy garbage bags to throw away. I hardly even have garbage!
    Plus I don't smoke.
    It sound like you think highly of it. Can you show some examples?
    No, it's not a 'great' lens, but it's not completely sterile and character less like some more 'perfect' lenses. So I think it's interesting. I haven't used it for a while now but there are a few examples in the link below (which was also in the post above):

    http://photocornucopia.com/1041.html

  5. #65

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    800
    All of the 50/1.7 Minolta lenses are very good. My favorite is the MC Rokkor-X. It isn't any sharper than the later MD models but is more solidly made. Did Konica make its own 35mm SLR lenses? Yes it did. In the early 1980s Tokina started to make lenses for the Konica cameras. Some, like the 28-135, 80-200/4 (one touch) and 80-200/4.5 were made under both names. Some of the Tokina made lenses are quite good. My favorites are the 21/2.8, 24/2.8 and 40/1.8. The second version of the 50/1.4 has lens elements made by Konica but a barrel made by Tokina. It also has a different aperture mechanism and stops down to f/22. Whether the f/22 feature is worthwhile depends on how much diffraction you can live with. There are many good standard lenses floating around and at this point condition is more important than brand. With the exception of macro lenses, the standard lenses were typically a manufacturer's best models. Earlier this year I got a 50/1.4 Canon New FD for $20 in very nice condition. If I had paid $100 for it the performance would have been the same. I just wouldn't have been a bargain. I already had two others like it as well as four earlier breech lock models. The second version of the 50/1.4 Canon FL is also excellent. Later FD models have better coating but are not otherwise sharper.

  6. #66
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,218
    Images
    296

    50mm lenses

    I love the 50 and 55mm lenses I have for my Pentax SLRs. The 50mm 1.4 and 55mm f/2 both render beautifully, and I prefer them equally to my Leica Summitar and better than the Voigtlander Nokton.

    All are stellar performers, however, and any shortcomings in my pictures should be attributed to me and not the lenses.

    I go in spurts where I sometimes prefer 50mm, and other times I'm using 35mm lenses almost exclusively. The 35mm f/2 Pentax is heavenly, and while the 35mm f1.4 Voigtlander Nokton is great, I wish I had a better 35 for the Leica. It has really soft corners even at f5.6 or f8, but for close-up portraits it's amazing.
    The Pentax 28mm f3.5 is also killer, and gets a fair amount of use.

    Then sometimes I use longer lenses too, but quickly stop.

    The 50mm lenses get about 70% of the use, and I almost always take just one lens when I travel or head out to photograph.

    I've had experience with Canon lenses too, but not enough to make a statement. I do know this, though, that most Leica lenses are hugely overrated picture quality wise. Using Leica enlargers and Leica enlarging lens, I see nothing from Summicron, Summitar, or Summarit lenses that improve quality over Pentax. Both are much better than Voigtlander, however. By no small margin either.
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  7. #67
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    the villages .centralflorida,USA and Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,444
    Images
    1
    nikkor50mmf/1.8
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  8. #68

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Slovenia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    706
    Images
    9
    My experience with Leica lenses tells me that I can use them wide open with confidence. Even the pedestrian ones. Their lates ASPH and APO variants are in another league (out of mine for sure) and therefore out of my reach.

  9. #69
    Copyhat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by clayne View Post
    I don't think Konica actually made their own lenses. I vote Minolta was behind it.
    Konica made their own lenses - except for the Hexar line where Tamron made a large part. Konica and Minolta never had anything to do with each other until they were reformed in the 1990's.

    The 50mm f/1.7 Hexanon is just as sharp as my 50mm f/1.8 Nikkor AI and the 40mm f/1.8 Hexanon pancake is also pretty capable.
    S°ren Hammer
    - Konica T3N
    - Konica FS-1
    - Nikon F4s
    - Nikon F5
    - Nikon F801

  10. #70
    AstroZon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    82
    I too like both 50 and 55mm lenses. My all time favorite is my SMC Pentax-M 50mm 1.4 - sharp and nice color balance. I also like the 55mm 1.7 Rokkor - another sharp and well balanced lens.

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  Ś   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin