Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,872   Posts: 1,583,533   Online: 1003
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lower Earth
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,270
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    32

    Would the Pentax 135 2.5 Make a Good Portrait/Long Lens?

    I've had a run of bad luck trying to find a really good (and budget priced) portrait/long lens. Three Leica R 90 2.8 Elmarits had to go back to the sellers due to haze and fungus. Focal Point wants a fortune to clean these things (although I'm sure it's worth it, as John knows what he's doing).

    I then tried the Canon FD S.C. 135 2.5 and an R 100 2. Both are outstanding, and the 135 is truly a great lens for so little money, but I really don't like FD mount cameras. The F-1 is too big and heavy, and the A series cameras feel and are cheesy. The two AE-1 P cameras I bought were squealers too. Having a top shutter speed of only 1/1000 is also an issue, and the F-1's 1/2000 alleged speed is mitigated by age, as it really tests out at 1/1000. No shooting wide open in the sun w/ my Tri-X.

    The last lens I tried was a Nikon non A.I. (ai'd) 85 1.8 lens. Oh, it's sharp and the build quality is superb, but it's pretty soft at 1.8. That's no big deal as it's fine at 2.8, but I am not impressed w/ the bokeh and IQ. There were shots that had some very unattractive hexagonal highlights. I guess many years of shooting Leica R glass has spoiled me. I want smooth, and no weird stuff in the background.

    Having lost a bundle on ship back fees on the Leicas, I'm done w/ them. I'm currently thinking of one of those Rokinon/Bower/Vivitar 85 1.4 lenses, or a Pentax 135 2.5 in m42 mount, which will fit my Nikon w/ a cheap adapter (stop down mode). The Nikon is the smarter way to go. $20 got me a N8008s w/ spot metering and 1/8000 top shutter speed. Deal of the year if you ask me. So, is there a LOT of difference between the various versions of the Pentax 135 2.5 lenses? Everyone says to get the SMC version, but the prices are considerably different.
    Last edited by momus; 08-26-2013 at 06:37 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #2
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9,063
    but I really don't like FD mount cameras.
    You might try the T90. To me it feels much better than expected due to ist size and weight.
    But, chosing a camera has a lot to do with affinity (often overlooked in postings advising a certain model). You should have the feeling "That's it".

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    318
    a M 42 lens can only be used on a Nikon with an adapter with a lens in it because of the shorter register of M 42 and this reduces the image quality. Otherwise the latest SMC version of the 2,5/135 (this latest version is said to be the best of the 135 mm Pentax M 42 lenses) is a quite heavy but superb lens, sharp to the edges even wide open and very well built, smooth focussing. It uses a rather unusual 58 mm filter thread and you should look for the original lens hood. It is not so often offered and the price is rather high. Very often you will find the ubiquitious 3,5/135 for small money, a very good lens too with 49 mm filter thread.

  4. #4
    Dr Croubie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    rAdelaide
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,540
    Images
    2
    I can't comment much on the Pentax 135/2.5 (except that I'd also like to know if it's any good).
    If you don't like FD cameras, how do you feel about EF cameras? I love my EF 85/1.8 and 100/2.0, both great. Or if you've already got the FD lenses, you can always put an EdMika adapter (I use my FL55/1.2 on my EOS 3 up to 1/8000s no problems).
    An awful lot of electrons were terribly inconvenienced in the making of this post.

    f/64 and be there.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    727
    135s make fine portrait lenses, so long as you have the space to operate one. Most studios are a bit cramped for that focal length at anything wider than head and shoulders, so 80 to 105 dominate. The 135 focal length also suffers from popularity scorn, as it, along with 28mm, was the first lens to be bought after the 50mm, as it's a relatively simple design and therefore inexpensive, again relatively speaking.

    Not sure how the Nikon N8008s is any less cheesy than an A-series Canon (I have both, as well as 135 lenses for each) but feel is everything. I agree the T90 may be the answer, so long as weight isn't a factor.

  6. #6
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,432
    Images
    148
    The Tamron Adaptall 135mm f2.5 is a superb lens with the advantage that it'll fit most older cameras with the relevany Tamron mount, they are worth looking for.

    Ian

  7. #7
    Ricardo Miranda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    860
    The SMC Takumar 135mm 2.5 is a very good lenses in any of the 2 versions made. Half way through production the optical cell was changed and results in a more crisp lens f2.5.
    I urge you to use the cameras for which lenses were made for. This modern mentality of using adapters for everything is a bad attitude.
    I'll suggest a Pentax Spotmatic F with the SMC Takumar lenses. That camera allows full aperture metering with said lenses.
    Fed 2, 4, 5
    Zenit 11, 12XP
    Olympus OM-1 MD, OM-1N, OM-2N, OM-2SP, OM10, OMG
    A bunch of Nikons
    Ferrania backer

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lower Earth
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,270
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    32
    I forgot about the need for a lensed adapter w/ the M42 on a Nikon. Thanks for the heads up jochen. That won't do. I got confused because I used to shoot Nikon and M42 lenses on FD cameras, and mixed that up w/ the Nikons.

    I thought about the T90 actually, but it's a very old, all electronic camera, and I don't trust one. The Nikon N8008s cameras (and the N90s) seem to be indestructible, so I'd better get a lens for that. It's a shame, as the FD glass is just wonderful. Sharp but not harsh, w/ great, smooth bokeh, especially the R 100 2. The FD 85 1.8 is a killer too. Too bad they don't adapt to other film cameras. I am pretty amazed at all the glowing reviews I've read on the early non ai Nikon 85 1.8 lenses, because my sample has very harsh IQ stopped down, and far too many little hexagonal highlights wide open. But, we all see things differently. I'm going to go w/ either another 90 R Elmarit (real glutton for punishment, but when they're clean they're perfect) or one of those Bower/Rokinon 85 1.4 lenses.

    Thanks for your 2 cents on adapters Ricardo, but I strongly disagree. I have been shooting Leica lenses on Nikons for ages, and they are a superb combination. No loss of image quality, the Nikons are 10x better than the R cameras (heavy, clunky beasts), and stop down metering is a breeze, especially w/ an AE camera. To each his own, that's my motto. If we all saw things the same way, we'd all drive the same car and marry the same gals. Shudder.
    Last edited by momus; 08-26-2013 at 11:47 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  9. #9
    Ricardo Miranda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    860
    and marry the same gals.
    Or the same boys!
    BTW, the 135mm F2.5 is perfect for portrait. That's what I used mine for.
    Fed 2, 4, 5
    Zenit 11, 12XP
    Olympus OM-1 MD, OM-1N, OM-2N, OM-2SP, OM10, OMG
    A bunch of Nikons
    Ferrania backer

  10. #10
    lxdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Redlands, So. Calif.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,756
    If you're looking for a really good, not expensive, portrait lens, with excellent image quality (including bokeh), to use on a Nikon...

    why not get the legendary Nikkor 105mm f/2.5?
    I do use a digital device in my photographic pursuits when necessary.
    When someone rags on me for using film, I use a middle digit, upraised.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin