Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,766   Posts: 1,670,820   Online: 806
      
Page 24 of 48 FirstFirst ... 141819202122232425262728293034 ... LastLast
Results 231 to 240 of 480
  1. #231
    darkosaric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,473
    Images
    4
    I just posted for sell 2 Mju cameras in Classifieds - after wrong auto focus and ruining great pictures from last weekend - I decided that my "everyday just in case" camera will be nikon F65 with 50mm. Bigger than Mju, but still light and small enough, and with manual focus I am sure that I will get what I want.

  2. #232

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    955
    Quote Originally Posted by benjiboy View Post
    Are you trying to tell me and the majority of the members of this forum are misguided, and they should get rid of their high end pro quality equipment and buy plastic autofocus compact cameras like the Olympus Mju ?.
    That's a strawman of your making. I'm saying history has re-assigned value by different criteria to those of the time such cameras were produced. People rarely use Nikon F or Canon F-1 cameras in the professional conditions they were intended for. Take away the collector and nostalgic market of people buying their youthful desires, and I fail to see which practical niche such cameras fulfil, and I think the market agrees with me. An Olympus XA in good condition sells for as much as a professional autofocus SLR, for example, an XA4 probably goes for more. This is because lightweight cameras with good image quality fit the lifestyle and needs of more contemporary photographers than those who require heavyweight pro SLRs. It doesn't make them 'bad' cameras, but the argument is like saying which was the better rocket, Saturn or Soyuz? Time has passed the discussion by. Both were very well made, absurdly heavy if you needed to carry more than one plus lenses, and are unlikely to ever occupy an evolutionary gap again. Who would have ever thought pocket size Japanese fixed lens rangefinder cameras would sell for much more than their original cost, for everyday use, when SLRs trade for a fraction of it? Needs and desires change.

  3. #233
    benjiboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    U.K.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,905
    Quote Originally Posted by blockend View Post
    That's a strawman of your making. I'm saying history has re-assigned value by different criteria to those of the time such cameras were produced. People rarely use Nikon F or Canon F-1 cameras in the professional conditions they were intended for. Take away the collector and nostalgic market of people buying their youthful desires, and I fail to see which practical niche such cameras fulfil, and I think the market agrees with me. An Olympus XA in good condition sells for as much as a professional autofocus SLR, for example, an XA4 probably goes for more. This is because lightweight cameras with good image quality fit the lifestyle and needs of more contemporary photographers than those who require heavyweight pro SLRs. It doesn't make them 'bad' cameras, but the argument is like saying which was the better rocket, Saturn or Soyuz? Time has passed the discussion by. Both were very well made, absurdly heavy if you needed to carry more than one plus lenses, and are unlikely to ever occupy an evolutionary gap again. Who would have ever thought pocket size Japanese fixed lens rangefinder cameras would sell for much more than their original cost, for everyday use, when SLRs trade for a fraction of it? Needs and desires change.
    All your argument proves if true is that the general public don't know their ass from a hole in the ground, and it isn't true Olympus XA's in good condition don't sell for anything like as much as Nikon F3's or Canon F1N-AE's, and who the hell is going to turn up to shoot a wedding or any other paying gig with an Olympus mju ?.
    Last edited by benjiboy; 08-06-2014 at 08:39 AM. Click to view previous post history.
    Ben

  4. #234

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    955
    Quote Originally Posted by benjiboy View Post
    All your argument proves if true is that the general public don't know their ass from a hole in the ground.
    Given the amount of amateurs who insisted on carrying pro SLRs and all the gubbins that went with them in the 70s and 80s, just to look the part, I have to agree with you.

  5. #235

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    955

  6. #236

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    955
    You said:
    Quote Originally Posted by benjiboy View Post
    All your argument proves if true is that the general public don't know their ass from a hole in the ground, and it isn't true Olympus XA's in good condition don't sell for anything like as much as Nikon F3's or Canon F1N-AE's, and who the hell is going to turn up to shoot a wedding or any other paying gig with an Olympus mju ?.
    I said:
    Quote Originally Posted by blockend View Post
    An Olympus XA in good condition sells for as much as a professional autofocus SLR
    Spot the difference.

    How many photographers are booked to shoot a wedding with a 35mm camera? I shot one three years ago in black and white at the bride groom's request, but I'd guess non-digital, non-medium/large format wedding photography is as rare as it gets.

  7. #237

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    955
    Quote Originally Posted by benjiboy View Post
    who the hell is going to turn up to shoot a wedding or any other paying gig with an Olympus mju ?.
    Terry Richardson might:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8i3VETLflk

  8. #238
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,880
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    431
    Quote Originally Posted by blockend View Post
    but Terry Richardson also thinks that cumshots are 'fine art'.

  9. #239

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    955
    Quote Originally Posted by TheFlyingCamera View Post
    but Terry Richardson also thinks that cumshots are 'fine art'.
    Is he paid a professional rate for them?

  10. #240
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area (Albany, California)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,257
    Images
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by blockend View Post
    Is he paid a professional rate for them?
    Yes, good standard. Just like Johnny Knoxville is paid for his work too.
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin