Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,687   Posts: 1,482,349   Online: 844
      
Page 1 of 23 123456711 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 228
  1. #1
    SchwinnParamount's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,010
    Images
    42

    Canon F1n vs. Nikon F2? Really, is one better than the other?

    I have them both and love them both. Silly question, but should I love one more than the other? This question is all about personal opinion but is it possible to quantify the advantages of one vs. the other and then decide the best camera?

    Let my attempt this:

    F2: Heavier. F1n: Lighter
    F2: The exposure information in the finder is brighter and easier to read. Aperture and shutter speed are at bottom of frame and both are bright.
    F1n: Gorgeous matte black finish and lovely lines
    F2: Says "Nikon" on the front of the prism...
    F1n: Doesn't
    F1n: Pleasing font used for "Canon" on prism.
    F1n: 50mm 1.4 is great lens, focus to 1 foot.
    F2: 50mm 1.4 is a great lens, does not focus as close as 1 foot.
    F1n: Lighted exposure info in prism.
    F1n: Has Aperture priority AE mode (Should I be comparing the F1n to the Nikon F3??)
    Both: Wonderful clunk when shutter is fired.
    Both: Can be used as weapons if you are being mugged.
    Both: Exchangeable finders and focus screens
    Both: Excellent lenses available in all interesting focal lengths
    F1n: Lenses are cheaper.
    F1n: Professes a like for HP5+
    F2: Won't load HP5+ without a bit of whining.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    793
    Probably better to compare the Nikon F2 to the Canon F-1 or the Canon New F-1 to the Nikon F3 since these pairs are of the same era. Are you considering whole systems or specific prisms?

  3. #3
    SchwinnParamount's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,010
    Images
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by Les Sarile View Post
    Probably better to compare the Nikon F2 to the Canon F-1 or the Canon New F-1 to the Nikon F3 since these pairs are of the same era. Are you considering whole systems or specific prisms?
    So far, with specific prisms. I only have the Canon F1n AE prism and the F2 - Uh, forgot the model number, but the original F2 prism. I would consider the complete systems against each other but don't have experience to do so. If you do, your input would be valuable.

  4. #4
    Tom1956's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,686
    Nikkor lenses are better. Nikon was established as a total system before F-1 even came along. Lot to be said for being first in the business.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portland Oregon
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    858
    Images
    522
    I've used both extensively and in my opinion the Canon bodies are just awful to use. They tried to automate things away when really all I want is a reliable body with a meter that tells me what it sees and lets me choose what to do with that information. Ditch the Canon, buy a nikon.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Iowa
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    610
    Images
    25
    Nothing is automated on the F-1.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    North Yorkshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    708
    I have always found that Nikon manual focus lenses for the Nikon were on the whole better made although there is little to compare between them in use. Canon used a lot of plastic in the later FD lenses whilst Nikon was mainly metal. Yes they are considerably cheaper too.
    The Nikon F2 has always held the top of the pile as being the finest mechanical 35mm camera ever made and having owned 2, I can vouch that they are bullet proof!. I don't know of anyone who has argued that point.There was an issue with the metering on the F2 models but there is a repairer in UK that can re-manufacture the tracking used to get the meter to respond correctly.
    As for no automation on the Canon there was an auto exposure head available for the F1 although how common these are I have no idea. I do know of one UK dealer with one for sale at present and the price is around £170 for the body only.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,837
    Your comparsison isn't so much about Nikon vs Canon but 70's vs 80's.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,544
    Nikon is great, but I still love my Canon F-1.

    Jeff

  10. #10
    vpwphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,081
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    7
    I have used a lot of cameras, but my F1n sans motor was smother more satisfying and i think lighter than the fabled Leica M3. (Yes I've used the Nikon F2... too many quirks compared to the modern F-1 and match needle meter)


    That is all. Use what you wish. My favorite photographer from grad school did outstanding work with a Pentax K1000 and 50mm f2.

Page 1 of 23 123456711 ... LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin