Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,299   Posts: 1,535,799   Online: 688
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Ara Ghajanian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Providence, RI
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    368
    Images
    14

    35mm Film and Airport X-Rays...

    Not sure if this relates to the 35mm forum, but it has to do with a 35mm camera and 35mm film.So...

    I'm starting to plan a trip to Lebanon for this summer to visit family I've never met. Obviously, the Nikon F3 is going with me. I want to take film with me (mostly because I'm not sure what is available there) and I want to bring it back home so that I can process it myself. I'm very concerned about x-rays and nosey customs officers. I may shoot TMAX3200 and I'm concerned about lead bags not being able to protect the film. I'm also concerned about regular film being affected. What have been your experiences going overseas?

    I was thinking of keeping the film in a separate lead bag and letting them hand inspect it, but I'm not sure they'll go for it. They're fine with that procedure on domestic flights, but once again this is overseas. Also, even though I'm an American citizen (born and raised here) I have a strange name and I'm wondering if that will draw attention to me.

    I'd like to hear about any experiences you have had bad or good. Also, your personal recommendations would be very helpful.
    Thanks in advance,
    Ara
    Just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

  2. #2
    rogueish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    3rd Rock
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    877
    Lead bags are a waste of time & money. take the film out of the canistersand pack in clear plastic bags, ask for a hand inspection. Had no problem at the Toronto and New Orleans airports. Officials were more than happy to oblige.
    There have been several threads and an article (I think) about this.
    http://www.apug.org/forums/article.php?a=93

  3. #3
    roteague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,672
    Images
    18
    I've traveled internationaly quite a bit the past few years, primarily Australia and Europe - although I went to Jordon in 2000. I've never had any problems with hand inspection of 35mm films. My suggestion is just to take them out of the box and place the film, in clear canisters, in a plastic bag. As for hand inspection. As rogueish pointed out, lead bags are a waste of money; they won't work for checked baggage and are ignored for hand inspections.
    Robert M. Teague
    www.visionlandscapes.com
    www.apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=2235

    "A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist" -- Louis Nizer

  4. #4
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,013
    Quote Originally Posted by rogueish
    Lead bags are a waste of time & money.
    Just curious, why do you think that the lead bags are a waste of money?

  5. #5
    roteague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,672
    Images
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by GaussianNoise
    Just curious, why do you think that the lead bags are a waste of money?
    Could be because they don't work. Lead bags are useless against luggage scanners, and may set off a signal for the hand-carried x-ray, requiring a hand-search. Why not just ask for a hand-search in the first place? FWIW, one of the advantages I see of a hand-search is that your camera equipment is being watched and handled by the security people, you need not worry about it being out of your sight.
    Robert M. Teague
    www.visionlandscapes.com
    www.apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=2235

    "A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist" -- Louis Nizer

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    2
    I fly to the Middle East from the U.S. (through Amsterdam) and back a couple of times a year, and always do what rogueish and roteague suggest--film in canisters in a ziploc bag and ask for a handcheck. This seems to work flying in both directions. Once in awhile one of the checkers will act impatient (the most film I've had handchecked is probably about 25 rolls), but I've never had anyone refuse to handcheck my film, AS LONG AS at least some of the film in my collection is rated 1600 or 3200. They always ask what the film is rated--if you've just got 800 speed or lower, they'll want to put it through the x-ray machine, but as long as I have even a few rolls of 3200 in my ziplock, they'll handcheck the whole package. They prefer the film out of the canisters, but I try to keep it in the canisters so I don't have to worry about dust going through my camera. I've also put 400 speed film through the x-ray before (once in the U.S., and again in Europe) and haven't had any ill effect, but I don't know how it would fare going through the x-ray two more times on the way home. Enjoy your trip!

  7. #7
    johnnywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,255
    Images
    78
    Normally film with an EI of 400 or less can go through the carry-on X-Ray with no problem. I've had my black and white film through up to 6 X-rays with no problem. EI 3200 film is a different story and should be hand-checked. Although I did inadvertantly put some through the carry-on X-Ray once with no problem.
    I travel a lot, including a couple of trips to the middle east (not to Lebanon though) and I've never been refused a hand check. Keep the film in clear plastic bags that are easy to pull out and put back in your carry-on luggage so you don't hold up the lineup though.
    Whatever you do, don't put film in the checked luggage. Those X-rays are really powerful

  8. #8
    rogueish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    3rd Rock
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    877
    Quote Originally Posted by GaussianNoise
    Just curious, why do you think that the lead bags are a waste of money?
    Wasted money:
    When the lead bag goes through the x-ray (checked luggage) and they can't see inside, they crank the machine up as high as it will go. These machines are quite powerfull. They can see inside then and these is a good chance it will cause some fogging on any film.
    Wasted time:
    If it is in the carry-on luggage, they will stop you and make you open the bag to show them whats in it.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    468
    I did EXACTLY what has been mentioned above... Flying from YYZ (Toronto) to CDG (Paris) and back in the summer of 2003. I had the clear ziplocks, I had the film ready, I was polite and patient, I had a few rolls of TMZ in the bag just to pursuade the checkers to hand inspect.

    Toronto granted the request - although I had to plead my case a bit... Paris made me take out the few rolls of TMZ and the rest had to go through (including ISO 800 colour neg) - no exceptions. No film was damaged though. Best thing you can do is try to minimize any hassles by following the above, but more importantly be as friendly as you can with the request.

    Have a wonderful trip,

    joe

  10. #10
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,013
    Quote Originally Posted by roteague
    Could be because they (lead bags) don't work. Lead bags are useless against luggage scanners, and may set off a signal for the hand-carried x-ray, requiring a hand-search. Why not just ask for a hand-search in the first place? FWIW, one of the advantages I see of a hand-search is that your camera equipment is being watched and handled by the security people, you need not worry about it being out of your sight.
    I wasn't aware that the lead bags triggered a "hand search" at the carry on inspection. I guess it makes sense but, I've never used one. On domestic flights in the US, I have always asked for all of my film to be hand inspected using the exact procedure outlined above (film out of box and handed to inspector in clear plastic zip lock bags with a very simple "please do not x-ray my film"). Never had any problems -- even with nothing faster than 400ISO in the bag. But, that was all roll film on domestic flights (and never in Las Vegas ).

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin