Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 76,268   Posts: 1,680,862   Online: 864
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    56

    Minolta MD W.rokkor-X 24mm lens, thoughts?

    [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][COLOR=#000000]Hello, i am a new owner of a minty minolta 24mm lens. I bought this lens since, i wanted something wider than 28mm for landscape, street and architecture work that was manual focus. One of my criteria was that it be a sharp lens with good resolving power, that etches out the details near and far. I have that with my contax G 28mm lens. And yes, i know it's not fair to compare contax to minolta or a range finder to a slr, but the minolta 50mm 1.7 is very impressive. So i figured the 24mm would be too. [/COLOR][/FONT]

    After reading the reviews here: www.rokkorfiles.com/24mm.html I thought i had found a great lens.

    Well after putting a few rolls in im underwhelmed. It's no where near as sharp as the rokkorfiles puts it at, These are my results bellow. I plan on shooting a roll of slide film. If they look good under the loop then i know it's not the lens.

    www.flickr.com/photos/tonywankenobi/sets/72157644862214629/

    www.flickr.com/photos/tonywankenobi/sets/72157644914298427/

  2. #2
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,342
    Images
    110
    Roosinov Russar 20mm gives that pink cast like yours. Its 750 dollars today. I dont know what would be the role of Leica in development in that lens but Minolta made many lenses for Leica and Leica supports the RD in Minolta. Same for Yashica for Zeiss.

    I read that now :
    The 24/2.8 has the best reputation and was also one of those Minolta designs that was licensed for use by Leica (others included the 35-70/3.5 and 70-210/4).
    一向寒山坐
    淹留三十年
    做来访亲友
    太半入黄泉
    渐减如残烛
    长流似逝川
    今朝对孤影
    不觉泪双悬

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    56
    My scanner is a pakon 135+ it's given me amazing results with all other films including portra 160 and ektar 100 which is what i shot. Is it a fuji frontier? No but it's damn close.

  4. #4
    fstop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by redstarjedi View Post
    [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][COLOR=#000000]Hello, i am a new owner of a minty minolta 24mm lens. I bought this lens since, i wanted something wider than 28mm for landscape, street and architecture work that was manual focus. One of my criteria was that it be a sharp lens with good resolving power, that etches out the details near and far. I have that with my contax G 28mm lens. And yes, i know it's not fair to compare contax to minolta or a range finder to a slr, but the minolta 50mm 1.7 is very impressive. So i figured the 24mm would be too. [/COLOR][/FONT]

    After reading the reviews here: www.rokkorfiles.com/24mm.html I thought i had found a great lens.

    Well after putting a few rolls in im underwhelmed. It's no where near as sharp as the rokkorfiles puts it at, These are my results bellow. I plan on shooting a roll of slide film. If they look good under the loop then i know it's not the lens.

    www.flickr.com/photos/tonywankenobi/sets/72157644862214629/

    www.flickr.com/photos/tonywankenobi/sets/72157644914298427/
    A tripod and deep focus technique would help.
    what body are you using?
    APUG: F, F/FTN,F2,F2A,F2AS,F3,F3HP,FA,FE,FM,FM2,FE2,XK,XM,XD, XD-5,XD-7,XD-11,XE,XE-5,XE-7,SRT101,SRT102,XG9,XG7,XG1,XG-SE,XG-M,X700,OM-1,OM-1n,OM-2,OM-2n,OM-4,F-1,F-1N,AE-1P,R5,500C/M,SCII
    DPUG:D100,D200,D300

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by fstop View Post
    A tripod and deep focus technique would help.
    what body are you using?

    Thanks for the advice. I shot a roll of provia 100f with a tripod.

    The body is a x-700 with motordrive. I've also used it with a XE-7 and a tri-pod. The long exposures are a good example.

    What do you mean by deep focus? A lot of the shots in the links were at f/16 or f/22.

  6. #6
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,342
    Images
    110
    Snapguy is right , you dont know the post processing also , they can convert a donkey in to an angel.
    一向寒山坐
    淹留三十年
    做来访亲友
    太半入黄泉
    渐减如残烛
    长流似逝川
    今朝对孤影
    不觉泪双悬

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    946
    Very few lenses of this type and focal length are at their sharpest at f/16 or f/22. There is too much diffraction at these stops. If you are shooting on a tripod but with very long exposures and with vibration induced by passing vehicles then you are not getting a good idea of the performance of the lens.

  8. #8
    dehk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    W Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    889
    Can't tell you much without knowing every detail involved. Good luck on the slides.
    - Derek
    [ Insert meaningless camera listing here ]

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    56
    Here are some scans of the provia 100f. I made these scans on my Polaroid sprint scan 120. I had to add a lot of sharpening and clarity in lr4.

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/tonywa...7645428704323/



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin