Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,908   Posts: 1,556,119   Online: 1242
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24
  1. #21
    gnashings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,376
    Images
    17
    Hmmm... I wonder how my 50mm f1.4 SSC Canon stacks up... I just got it recently, so dont have a take on it - but the shots I do have, seem pretty free of visible vignette.

    Sorry - I know that partially I am just being a crap disturber but I this thread got me thinking about my own 1.4, though tis not a nikkor

  2. #22
    Helen B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hell's Kitchen, New York, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,557
    Images
    27
    "Just to clear up a little terminology here, what your seeing is really "light falloff" and not vignetting."

    Paul,

    Do you have a source for that definition? Though what Ara is observing is probably what I know of as 'artificial' or 'optical' vignetting (as I described above) because it disappears when the lens is stopped down, the falloff in illumination according to the cos ^4 (or cos^3 if the Slyusarev/tilting pupil effect is used) is often called 'natural vignetting' as far as I was aware.

    Thanks,
    Helen

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    30
    Helen, I'm sure you are correct in differentiating the two as various forms of vignetting, but in reviews of lenses for the average person this is normally referred to as light falloff. In Ken Rockwell's review of this lens, (BTW, I have been looking at this lens to buy, that's why I know where these reviews are) he says:

    f/1.4: Spherical aberration lowers contrast. A lot of coma in the corners making them quite soft. Falloff

    In fact he recommends to bypass this lens altogether and get the 1.8 instead.

    Paul B.

  4. #24
    skahde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    425
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul_Baker
    in reviews of lenses for the average person this is normally referred to as light falloff. In Ken Rockwell's review of this lens, (BTW, I have been looking at this lens to buy, that's why I know where these reviews are) he says:
    For what it's worth I made good experiences with not taking one single source too serious. I'd rather have a look at several sources if possible, look where they agree and what doesn't fit the picture and trying to find out why things might disagree. Ken is not very fond of 50mm lenses after all and says "I no longer even own any 50mm lenses". I think that is a good reason to take his judgement with more than the usual pinch of salt.

    best

    Stefan

    PS.: Neither vignetting nor falloff should be reagerded an exact term as used buy photographers. If you try to do so you will run into trouble faster than you can say Waxahatchie.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin