Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,814   Posts: 1,581,600   Online: 875
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    johnny9fingers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    NW Wisconsin hard by the shore of Lake Superior
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    108
    Images
    5

    SLR or Rangefinder

    Hello all,
    I find myself in the rare and fortunate position of a small cash windfall and would like to buy a really nice camera. I've narrowed it down to these 2 machines. The Konica Hexar AF and the Nikonf4s. I realize these are two different types of camera so here is what I will be shooting. Family social gatherings, like parties, camping trips amusement parks and fairs. Travel phorography, candid shots just walking around town. I may also want to snap off a few quick shots of birds and chipmunks and the bird feeder or any wildlife that may wander through the backyard. While I've been shooting a while I am still an amature and do not plan on earning any money from photography,but may enter a contest or two. Your advice will be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you.

  2. #2
    MattCarey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,303
    Images
    31
    If you really want to do any bird/wildlife photography, go SLR. Longer lenses, quick AF.

    For the family-type stuff, the Hexar (especially the one with the stealth mode) might be smaller and lighter.

    Matt

  3. #3
    narsuitus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    566
    Either camera will meet your needs. However, for travel photography and candid shots while walking around town, the smaller and lighter weight Konica is better. Not only is the Nikon F4 a bigger and heavier camera, it is not at all inconspicuous.

    For birds, chipmunks, and other animal wildlife, the Nikon F4 with a 300mm or longer telephoto lens is the better choice.

  4. #4
    df cardwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Dearborn,Michigan & Cape Breton Island
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,342
    Images
    8
    The Hexar AF, not RF ?

    If you're looking at the AF, then it is a perfect compliment to the F4.

    My good pal, and fellow Apug-er, has some info on both at his site:

    http://www.dantestella.com/technical/hexar.html

    http://www.dantestella.com/technical/f4.html

    The Hexar might be the very camera to grab when you have 5 minutes to pack for that surprise round-the-world trip. It is just superb.

    The F4 is a very, very good AF camera and a wonderful Manual focus camera.

    Great stuff: good luck.

    .
    "One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid,
    and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"

    -Bertrand Russell

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    11
    I'd go with an SLR for nature shots, ... as you will probably want to use longer lenses (>135mm).

    I'd also buy a fixed lens rangefinder for the low light shooting. Nothing to expensive. There are some excellent cameras that can be found for $50 and less.

  6. #6
    Dave Parker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,049
    If you want to shoot wildlife and birds, an SLR and big glass is almost a must, my two main lenses for this type of work are AF 300 f/2.8 and 600mm f/4, birds, depending on species are difficult at best, for other work, I keep a small rangefinder in the car with me, that still has a moderate zoom on it, which seems to work out quite well.

    Dave

  7. #7
    johnny9fingers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    NW Wisconsin hard by the shore of Lake Superior
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    108
    Images
    5
    I like the versitility of the SLR but the cost of the glass might be brutal on my budget. Can you take a photo made with the Hexar on a film like Kodak Porta or Fuji NPH and blow it up to see smaller details?

  8. #8
    Dave Parker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,049
    Both Protra and NPH are pretty fine grained films and do pretty well up to 16x20, I use NPH for my wedding work and quite often go to 16x20 with no problems, but of course I am dealing with frame filling images of people, so they are designed to be viewed from a certain distance, if shooting birds, you might be pushing the envelope to get some of the smaller birds large enough to see clearly, but you would have to do some experimentation to see what works for you.

    Dave

  9. #9
    kunihiko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tokyo
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    242
    Images
    17
    Since you're shooting 35mm RF now, SLR and tele will expand your field.
    kunihiko kario

  10. #10
    johnny9fingers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    NW Wisconsin hard by the shore of Lake Superior
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    108
    Images
    5
    Thanks to all for the great input. I will probably go with the Hexar AF just for the simplicity of not having to worry about which lens to use and because it is so quiet. I do know when my next opportunity comes along a F4 or F5 will be in my future. Thanks again for the advice.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin