Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,719   Posts: 1,514,850   Online: 904
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    gnashings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,376
    Images
    17

    Canon FD 35mm f2 lenses...?

    I know of 3 different variants of this (35mm f2 FD)lens, but would like to get the input of the resident Canon-ologists and FD gurus.
    What I would like to know is the following:
    -how many were there? (I know of the two locking ring, original FD era f2 and f2 SSC as well as the New FD version - is there more?).
    -what were the differences (I know some had the concave front element, for example).
    -which are more/less desireable (from a performance point of view)

    I just spend some time doing research on this lens - and found a lot conflicting reports (especially as to which lenses had the concave element, as well as the pros and cons of that). I would really appreciate it if any of you could clarify this for me or point me to a site that can help (I found the photography in Malaysia site to be a good stand by, but on this subject I found little info, and much contradiction).

    Thanks in advance for all and any help and information,

    Peter.

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,134
    Images
    20
    I owned the last version--great lens, a real sleeper, and a good bargain now. A few years ago they were going for around $200, and now they're often under $100.

    The early chrome nose with the radioactive concave front element is considered to be excellent for B&W, but can have some problems with color, perhaps due to yellowing of the front element or perhaps due to the design of the lens.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3
    gnashings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,376
    Images
    17
    Thanks for the info - so its the chrome nose (earliest version) that had the concave lens? Right there you helped me out - many sources say it was the SSC with the concave element... but I always questioned that as the ones I saw first hand and in pictures appeared to have a regular, convex lens. Thanks for clarifying that, too.

    Peter.

  4. #4
    cao
    cao is offline
    cao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    188

    Does the UV bleaching trick work here?

    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb
    The early chrome nose with the radioactive concave front element is considered to be excellent for B&W, but can have some problems with color, perhaps due to yellowing of the front element or perhaps due to the design of the lens.
    I know that some have had success bleaching the yellow out of the Pentax 50/1.4 (Super and SMC) Takumars by exposing them to ultraviolet light, and I wonder if that would work with these Canon lenses as well.

  5. #5
    gnashings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,376
    Images
    17
    Apparently most of the rare-earth glass will "bleach" if exposed to sunlight for a while. Never tried it myself.

  6. #6
    kunihiko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tokyo
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    242
    Images
    17
    As far as the Canon Camera Museusm lists, there are 3 versions of chrome nose 35mm f2, a concave s.s.c and a convex s.s.c.

  7. #7
    gnashings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,376
    Images
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by kunihiko
    As far as the Canon Camera Museusm lists, there are 3 versions of chrome nose 35mm f2, a concave s.s.c and a convex s.s.c.
    Thanks for that info. See what I mean? Right there we have several versions, which is what I encountered with these lenses. Then there is the New FD version... oy!

    Peter.

    Edit:

    This just in: I went to museum site, and found the info you speak of. When I tried to access it before, on several occasions, I was unable...

    So i guess there is the 3 chrome nose, 2 ssc and 1 New FD.
    Now, I am unable to tell the differences between the 3 chrome lenses, which ssc lens is better (since the newer one is convex... and generally, they do get better as they develop)?
    The only significant difference I can find other than the front element is that the New FD lens has more lenses in more groups...

    So i guess it boils down to this: are the concave lens models worth pursuing for any reasons other than curiousity and the appeal of the unusual? And also, is the New FD model significantly better?

    I DO know that most of these differences will be of purely academic significance, and most likely, be lost on my meagre skills - not to mention the inherent limitations of hand-held, 35mm phtography. But I would still like to know
    Last edited by gnashings; 01-30-2006 at 02:51 AM. Click to view previous post history.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin