Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,928   Posts: 1,556,829   Online: 855
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wi
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    3,242

    50 mm 2.5 Skopar Question

    Normally people are quite enthusiastic about the quality of the Voigtlander lenses. I am interested in the 50mm 2.5 Skopar. I have not seen much entusiasm for this lens on the web. I have seen a good deal of entusiasm for the 35mm 2.5 Skopar.

    Does any APUG members have any substantial experience with this lens to share? I am looking for an inexpensive compact 50mm to use on a rangefinder camera. If it was not for the expense I would buy a new 50mm 2.8 Elmar.
    Claire (Ms Anne Thrope is in the darkroom)

  2. #2
    Uncle Bill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oakville and Toronto Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,371
    Images
    311
    I find a lot of people spend the extra bucks and head with the 50 Nokton, I too am curious with the 50 f2.5 Skopar, I love my 35 f2.5 a lot on my M3.
    Bill
    "Life moves pretty fast, if you don't stop and look around once and a while, you might just miss it."
    Ferris Bueller

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    Dear Claire,

    I have one and it's excellent; my wife and I often use it in place of the 50/1.5 because it's smaller, lighter and takes 39mm filters instead of 52mm. It's beautifully finished and very easy to use, like an old Leica lens. It's true that it's not brilliant at f/2.5 but even f/2.8 transforms it to a superb lens and at f/5.6 there's not much need for anything else.

    Put it this way: it'll be going with us to Portugal in a few days, along with my 35/1.4 pre-aspheric Summilux and new 75/2 Summicron and Frances's 28/1.9 Ultron and 90/3.5 Apo-Lanthar. As Frances says, "I was never much for standard lenses until I got that, and now, well, it's my standard lens..."

    Cheers,

    Roger (www.rogerandfrances.com)

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wi
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    3,242
    Thank you. For some reason this lens get mediocre reviews at various websights.
    Claire (Ms Anne Thrope is in the darkroom)

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    Dear Claire,

    If you were nearer, I'd lend it to you. I don't think you'd be disappointed.

    Cheers,

    Bart Applecroaker
    (Well, people here seem to love their 'handles')

  6. #6
    Uncle Bill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oakville and Toronto Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,371
    Images
    311
    A used 50 f2.5 Skopar is tempting as my Collapsable Summicron that came with my M3 is flare prone at the worst moments.

    Bill
    "Life moves pretty fast, if you don't stop and look around once and a while, you might just miss it."
    Ferris Bueller

  7. #7
    rfshootist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Old Europe
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    387
    Images
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by Claire Senft
    Normally people are quite enthusiastic about the quality of the Voigtlander lenses. I am interested in the 50mm 2.5 Skopar. I have not seen much entusiasm for this lens on the web.
    Claire, A friend of me owns it, and I would agree to all what Roger said. Maybe one should add that the lens got a bit pincushion distortion, what gets visible if you got a straight line in the frame parallel and close to the edge. Tho it is much less distortion than my J8 shows I personally would not take it if architectural photography would be my passion. For all other purposes it is surely a top performer, crystal clear and super precise, a bit of the Industar type, 3d midformat look sometimes, and it is worth much more than the handful of bucks you pay for it . Also the quality feel is top.

    Best,
    Bertram
    A la recherche du temps perdu: www. bersac.de

  8. #8
    DBP
    DBP is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,885
    Images
    34
    I suspect the lack of widespread enthusiasm is because of the speed, or rather the lack thereof. There are a lot of good choices in 50/2 screw mount, so I have never felt the need for the 50/2.5.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    Quote Originally Posted by DBP
    I suspect the lack of widespread enthusiasm is because of the speed, or rather the lack thereof. There are a lot of good choices in 50/2 screw mount, so I have never felt the need for the 50/2.5.
    I'm sure you're right but I prefer it to most of the old f/2 lenses I have owned, including many by (dare I say it) Leitz. And it's so compact and ergonomic!

    Cheers,

    R.

  10. #10
    DBP
    DBP is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,885
    Images
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Hicks
    I'm sure you're right but I prefer it to most of the old f/2 lenses I have owned, including many by (dare I say it) Leitz. And it's so compact and ergonomic!

    Cheers,

    R.
    I don't doubt that, but I happen to have lucked into a very good Jupiter 8 for $8. When I am shooting it is not readily obvious from the prints that I have switched from the 35/2.5 Skopar to the Jupiter 8. So my next Voigtlander lens will probably be either the 21 or the 25.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin