Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,540   Posts: 1,544,353   Online: 1062
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    dcelfving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Francisco
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    40
    Images
    3

    Nikon F100 - Waist level viewfinder?

    I just noticed some Nikon waist level viewfinders in the classified section. They seem specifically tailored for the F5. Will they work with the F100? Is there a similar product that will work with the F100?

    I had no idea that such things existed for 35mm SLR cameras - I'm really quite excited! I tend to shoot a lot of street and subway photos and a waistlevel would allow me to be a lot less obtrusive.

  2. #2
    Amund's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Oslo,Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    902
    Images
    68
    No, the F100 hasn`t a removable prism, as the F5 has...
    Buy a Rolleiflex
    Amund
    __________________________________________
    -Digital is nice but film is like having sex with light-

  3. #3
    naturephoto1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Breinigsville, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,819
    Images
    84
    There is probably a Nikon angle finder that would fit the camera eyepiece. You would have to view the camera close to the eye and you might find it useful. But, not knowing the camera, I do not know what meter information would be visible.

    Rich
    Richard A. Nelridge
    http://www.nelridge.com

  4. #4
    dcelfving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Francisco
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    40
    Images
    3
    You know, I realized that the F5 has a removable prism shortly after posting. I was hoping that, perhaps, there was some fantastical device that would work with the F100, but that doesn't really make sense . . .

    It's almost enough to make me invest in an F5. Would that I were not a poor student!

  5. #5
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,351
    Images
    132
    You could probably buy a used F2 for a fraction of the F5 and be able to have a WLF. Plus, you can reuse your exisiting lenses.
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

  6. #6
    naturephoto1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Breinigsville, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,819
    Images
    84
    Quote Originally Posted by mhv
    You could probably buy a used F2 for a fraction of the F5 and be able to have a WLF. Plus, you can reuse your exisiting lenses.
    Same would be true for an F3 (no autofocus though).

    Rich
    Richard A. Nelridge
    http://www.nelridge.com

  7. #7
    colrehogan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Shooter
    Large Format Pan
    Posts
    2,016
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    16
    Nikon does have a right angle finder, but it's not really any good for waist level viewing. I don't recall what is visible in the viewfinder. I can check later on today and reply again if I need to. It's great for doing macro work though. Seems to me that you lose your ability to meter when using the WLF though. I'd have to check that when I get home too.
    Diane

    Halak 41

  8. #8
    naturephoto1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Breinigsville, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,819
    Images
    84
    Hi Diane,

    As I recall with the F2 when the WLF was swapped for the regular prism, that the meter was replaced. I am not sure if that is the case with the F5. In any case, that was one of the reasons that the Canon F1 series had the meter in the camera and not the head. When you replaced the regular prism with the WLF the replacement (without the meter) was so less costly than the Nikon.

    PS

    I mentioned the angle finder above, but do check what is visible in the finder when attached to the camera.

    Rich
    Richard A. Nelridge
    http://www.nelridge.com

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,957
    With the F and F2, when you remove the prism viewfinder you remove the meter. So there is no meter for these 2 models with the waist level finder. The F3 only has center weighted meter but the metering function is retained with any viewfinder as well as no viewfinder. With the F4, I am not sure. With the F5, only spotmeter is available with the waist level finder. Matrix and center weighted metering are not available on the F5 with the waist level finder. With the F6, Nikon decided that the waist level finder is not neccessary thus it has no interchangable finder feature.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Montgomery, Il/USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,097
    dceflving,
    Although the finders can't be changed there were slip on finders made.
    Leitz had some early on. You could take the reflex finder from an old folder & mount it on the acc shoe for cheap.
    Heavily sedated for your protection.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin