Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,951   Posts: 1,557,940   Online: 1012
      
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 41
  1. #11
    Bromo33333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    669
    Quote Originally Posted by naturephoto1 View Post
    I have had a Leica R4S modified to an R4SP, still have an R4SP, an R7 and a R8. All have been very reliable with little problem over the many years. I have not used a Leica R6 or the updated R6.2. Both should be very fine and reliable cameras. As to the Leica glass- they are superb. You will not be disappointed. The feel and operation of Leica lenses mechanically is legendary. No mechanical 35mm or medium format feel and operate like Leica lenses. They use self lubricating helixes of brass on aluminum.

    Rich
    No doubt - agree. For a cost no object situation, Leica is a truly amazing thing. And the used R lens prices are a little less stratospheric than the rangefinder - so is a relative bargain.
    B & D
    Rochester, NY
    ========================
    Quiquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New Jersey (again)
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    1,983
    I bought my F2A new in 1979. Aside from replacing the seals two years ago, it's been an incredibly reliable piece of equipment. Electronics in the camera are limited to the metering head, which has performed without any problems over the years. I was going to say flawlessly, but I'll have to think about that.

    ... yes, flawlessly.

    I agree that there is a huge amount of Nikon manual-focus glass available for reasonable prices.

  3. #13
    snegron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Hot, Muggy, Florida
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    805
    I have an F2A, and of all my Nikons, I must admit it is my favorite. Note however that with the motor drive attatched (MD2) it weighs as much as a Volkswagon. As far as overall cost with lenses, Nikon will be less expensive in the long run. Have you thought of what lenses you wish to get? What type of pictures will you be shooting? If you plan on purchasing several lenses, you might want to factor in the added cost to your purchase. The only two Nikon lenses I have ever had a problem with were the 35mm series E which fell apart, and the 18-70 DX kit lens that came with a D70 I purchased. The cheap construction and poor optical quality of that lens was very unlike other Nikon lens I have ever seen. Nikon built its optical reputation with its manual focus lenses. All of my other Nikon glass produce outstanding results.

  4. #14
    Bromo33333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    669

    Nikkor vs. Series E - the guy has a point!

    Quote Originally Posted by snegron View Post
    The only two Nikon lenses I have ever had a problem with were the 35mm series E which fell apart, and the 18-70 DX kit lens that came with a D70 I purchased.
    I have a 28mm/2.8 series E that has been though a lot and has held up - bought it used, didn't look like it had been used much when I did, though it isn't built as well as the Nikkors. If you plan on beating them mercilessly, they won't hold up like current AF from Nikon. I got it for under $75, and I really needed a wide angle immediately at the time so it was hard to pass up - served me well over the years.
    B & D
    Rochester, NY
    ========================
    Quiquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur

  5. #15
    Daniel_OB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Mississauga, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    420
    Thanks to eveyone for your time spent to help. And F2 and R6 are really good machinery. I have several electronic cameras, but traveling to exotic places with thinking about batteries is not very good, and it is why I wish to avoid my R8 or F6. What intrigue me is that F2 keep on price (on e-bay) nearly the same as it was introduced a long ago, nearly before I was born. Is that machine really so good? Well all says it is. Again thanks to all.

    www.Leica-R.com

  6. #16
    Mark Feldstein's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Monterey, CA / BiCoastal NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    163
    Howdy Daniel: I shoot with F2s and Leica M-6s so I can't speak to the Leica R series. But the F2s combined with Nikkor glass are wonderful cameras. They operate smoothly and pretty quietly, you can use them to pound fence posts with, can still get them repaired, and if you happen to have paws that are as big as mine, a pleasure to have in your hands. Just a sturdy, flexible, well-made piece of equipment with a ton of available accessories and lenses.

    BTW, you can find some excellent deals on F2s at KEH.com in Atlanta. They have a 30 day warranty and 15 day full refund policy. Also, get the Moose Peterson "Nikon Compendium" to give you some historical aspects of these things and help you navigate the vast sea of Nikon. ;>)
    Take it light.
    _________________________________
    Without guys like John Coltrane, Count Basie and Duke Ellington, life....would be meaningless.

  7. #17
    butterflydream's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Korea
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    192
    Images
    31
    Nikon F2as... I have touched it just yesterday that belongs to my friend.
    I have Canon F-1 (old version) and was thinking about going back to Leica R6.2 but I think I was very much attracted by Nikon F2as. Very solid feeling and the light meter was much better than Canon F-1.

    Only two things bother me:
    - Too heavy and big (the reason why I want to move from F-1 to R6, my hands are small)
    - The focusing ring and aperture ring turns opposite direction of Canon/Leica.

    I have never used Nikon before. Is this opposite direction difficult to adapt?

  8. #18
    Bromo33333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    669
    Quote Originally Posted by butterflydream View Post
    Nikon F2as... I have touched it just yesterday that belongs to my friend.
    I have Canon F-1 (old version) and was thinking about going back to Leica R6.2 but I think I was very much attracted by Nikon F2as. Very solid feeling and the light meter was much better than Canon F-1.

    Only two things bother me:
    - Too heavy and big (the reason why I want to move from F-1 to R6, my hands are small)
    - The focusing ring and aperture ring turns opposite direction of Canon/Leica.

    I have never used Nikon before. Is this opposite direction difficult to adapt?
    If you want a particular camera you should get it (sounds like you are attracted the the Nikon F2A). I don't think anything else would be satisfying to you - because you will always be saying "what if" every time you take a picture. I also don't think any of the camera you are considering are bad - all are wonderful cameras.

    I tend to analyze a lot before purchasing - and I was trying to compare a rangefinder to SLR's - so completed a list and fleshed it out with a R6 entry for you (I know you didn't ask, but I already had 80% of it, so what the heck! )

    I hope this helps you - I decided to include it because you mentioned you were concerned about weight and size of the camera!

    Size and weight (w/o lens)
    Leica R6: 148 x 97 x 57mm : ~627g (web search)
    Leica M7: 158 x 101 x 62mm: ~890g (web search)
    Leica MP: 158 x 101 x 62mm: ~790g (Web search)
    Ziess Ikon RF: : 138 x 78 x 32mm: ~500g (Zeiss website)
    Nikon F2A: 152 x 102 x 65mm: ~840g (web search)
    Nikon FM2: 142 x 90 x 60mm: ~540g (FM2/T is ~515g I think) (Nikon site)

    Lens weight:
    Nikon 50mm/f1.8 AIS F-mount lens weight: ~210g (weighed mine on scale)
    Leica 50mm/f2 SLR R-mount lens weight: ~290g (web search)
    ZI 50mm/f2 RF M-mount lens weight: ~210g (Robert White's site)

    Not counting UV filter and lens cap.

    So a kit might weigh:

    Nikon F2A with 50mm: 985g
    Leica R6 with 50mm: 917g
    Nikon FM2 with 50mm: 750g (confirmed appx right with kitchen scale)

    For comparison (I did mine in reverse - I was considering the below):
    Leica MP + 50mm:1000g
    Leica M7 + 50mm: 1100g
    ZI RF + 50mm: 710g

    You can see that the F2A isn't too bad compared to Leica rangefinders, but if you want a similar experience, the FM2 is a light weight camera (and when I got the ZI package with a 35/f2 Biogon, my wife was surprised they felt about the same weight, and while the FM2 was a bit bulkier, they all handled appx the same! :o )

    You probably know what you want already - so you should get that, but if you want some additional data to think about, I hope this helps!

    Also - the focussing directions won't be an issue - though there will be some new habits to be learned - but since each person is wired differently, YMMV.

    Good luck and tell us if you decide anything!
    B & D
    Rochester, NY
    ========================
    Quiquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur

  9. #19
    wilsonneal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Northern NJ
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    578
    Images
    17
    I have two F2AS. Both are still running perfectly and have never had any service whatsoever (actually, one of them just stopped syncing with flash, so I guess it should go in for service....but since I bought an 8x10 I haven't shot a frame on smaller format). My experience with Leica is that the collectors drive up prices beyond their value to me as a shooter (YMMV). Granted, my experience is with Leica-rangefinder gear, and the same may not be true for Leica-reflex gear.

    While the original post said "excluding lenses", to me the point is the difference in the glass. I see a real difference between Leitz and Nikkor lenses. It's subtle, but it's discernable. When I look at the pictures I've done with Leica glass they're a little smoother, maybe a little less contrasty (I was using mostly 50's and 60's glass), with a special quality that I like. I like Nikon glass, too, but it seems snappier, less romantic. This may be complete BS and totally psychological, but it's my perception.
    Neal

  10. #20
    Jeffrey A. Steinberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Scarsdale, NY
    Posts
    296
    If you don't need miror lockup and detatchable finders, I find the FM3A to be a great backup to my F2AS. Its all mechanical but can work with batteries to (hybrid shutter). It will likely cost you more but it is almost brand new compared to 30 year old F2AS.

    That being said, I am almost always picking up my F2AS. There is something about the mirror "kerlunk" that just makes me feel like I am taking a better picture.

    Lastly, another option is an Olympus OM-3Ti, a fully mechanical camera with great lenses and a nice spot metering option.

    --Jeffrey
    --Jeffrey

    ______________________________________________
    Jeffrey Steinberg, K2MIT
    Scarsdale, NY

    www.jsteinbergphoto.com (my avocation)
    www.reversis.com (my vocation)

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin