Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,561   Posts: 1,545,290   Online: 757
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    188
    Images
    13
    The Fujica 100mm EBC 2.8 is very nice and quite small and compact - it is a good lens to carry round. This would be my first choice

    I can also vouch for the sharpness of the Super Tak 105mm - it is a bit larger but easy to find

    A little more unusual is the Schacht Travenar 90mm which is a pre-set lens with a 16 blade aperature iris - nice and sharp and has good colour rendition

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    13
    I have an old Prinz m42 mount 100mm f2.8 which I bought at a camera fair sometime ago, and cannot remember what I paid but it wasnt much. I really dont know who the manufacturer was but it is a solid metal barrel with very smooth focusing. Pleasantly surprised by the sharpness and colour rendition of this lens. Not a bokah expert so cannot comment on that. Also use it on my Mirandas with an adaptor.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    Quote Originally Posted by laverdure View Post
    I'm in the market. What do you all think of the options?
    If money's no object, I believe that the 100/2 Planar is about to be released in M42. I rather like my old 85/1.9 Takumar, though.

    Cheers,

    R.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    119
    I like my Vivitar Series 1 135mm f2.3. Although it is large and heavy and has a very long focus throw.

    Wayne

  5. #15
    Seele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    194
    Meyer/Pentacon 100/2.8.

  6. #16
    Abbazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Brunei
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    55
    I second Peter Schauss' suggestion: get the Helios 40. It's an FSU lens of classic Biotar formula:



    You'd need the Canon 1.2/85 EF-L II lens at 10x the price for better portraits, softer colors and smoother out of focus areas. Don't be mistaken, it's not a soft lens; it is very sharp, even wide open. This Helios is a killer lens!



    The Helios 40 sells for around $150 but you will need an adapter because it comes only in M39 mount. The newer Helios 40-2 is a bit more expensive, but it's multicoated and comes in standard M42 mount. As usual with FSU lenses, quality may vary a lot from sample to sample. Make sure you get the lens from a reputable dealer with a solid return policy.

    There is a great page on the Helios on Dante Stella's website.

    Cheers,

    Sebastien

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    812
    I have a 105/2.8 Super Takumar and it's nice. If I had to choose only one lens in this range in M42 mount I would get the Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 macro. I have this lens in Canon FD mount. It's much heavier than the 105/2.8 Super Takumar and some people think it's a little too sharp for portraits but I like it. I have several Vivitar 105/2.8 T4 lenses as well as a 105/2.8 Soligor T4. These need to be stopped down a little to be sharp. Somewhere I have the M42 Adaptall II adapter for using my 90/2.5 Tamron SP (2nd version) macro lens. This is also a very nice lens.

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    376
    Nikkor 105mm f2.5

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    104

    135mm goes well with m42

    The 135mm lens was a classic focal length for SLR shooting in the M42 days before zoom lenses that included that focal length became popular. A great street and landscape lens, it is a bit long for head-shot portraits, but for head and torso it gives you fine subject/background focus control.

    Although SMC lenses cost more on the used market, I've found that a Takumar 135mm f/2.5 (without Super Multi-Coating) is fine as long as you pay attention to light sources and maybe even use a lens hood.
    Jeff Polaski
    "A full-time job seriously interferes with photography."

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cambridge, MA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    895
    I have heard a couple people absolutely rave about the Fujinon EBC 100mm f/2.8.

    Sadly, one never appears to become available on e-Bay.

    If you are willing to look at 135mm lenses, I've a bit to say about a couple Pentax Super Multi-coated Takumars that may be of interest.

    Pentax Super Multi-Coated Takumar 135mm f/3.5: Hard to beat as a carry-around general-purpose 135mm telephoto. Not the fastest lens, obviously, but very sharp even at f/4.5 and it performs very well focused at near distances. Contrast is very high. Very well-built with smooth but well-damped focusing and very nice handling (takes 49mm filters!). It's bokeh is not quite as good as I'd like. Even so, I think this may be among the best values in the M42 world because it can be had for 45 USD on e-Bay.

    Pentax Super Multi-Coated Takumar 135mm f/2.5: If you are trying to seduce a beautiful woman...take her picture with this lens.

    It excels as a portrait lens. Nice, fast aperture, and very good to excellent bokeh. It's build quality is also excellent and its focusing action is similar to it slower brother described above. It's slightly harder to handle as it's heavier and accepts 58mm filters. I've only used this at its wider apertures (say, f/2.5 - 5.6) and it doesn't seem to be quite as sharp and contrasty as the f/3.5 lens and it's near-focus performance is, similarly, not as strong in that range. Again, that isn't unexpected for a portrait lens. And it really, really does great work for portraits. Figure 70-90 USD on e-Bay.

    I have heard, however, that above f/5.6 this becomes an extremely sharp lens and contrasty lens - more so than the f/3.5. I just haven't put it through its paces in that aperture range yet.

    Hope it helps.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin