Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,733   Posts: 1,515,360   Online: 977
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Eastern Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,595

    Tamron lens questions (2)

    While I was visiting my local camera shop a bag of Tamron gear was dropped of for assement
    One lens is a 200-500 f6.9 apaptall mount which weighs a ton.Has anyone used one? Venture an opinion?
    Lens #2 is a Tamron 80-210 3.8 adaptall with a huge scratch on the front element.More like a gouge really.That lens was given to me (thanks eh?). Any way to make this glass usable?

    Thank You

  2. #2
    Peter Black's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,001
    Images
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kennedy View Post
    Lens #2 is a Tamron 80-210 3.8 adaptall with a huge scratch on the front element.More like a gouge really.That lens was given to me (thanks eh?). Any way to make this glass usable?

    Thank You
    I hate to tell you Mike, but this wasn't even that great a lens in perfect condition.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Eastern Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,595
    Probably why I got it as a freebee.

  4. #4
    Abbazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Brunei
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    55
    Mike, one big scratch will probably have less effect on your pictures than many of those so-called "cleaning marks" scattering light all over the place. Usually, defects on the front element are less detrimental to the pictures than when the rear element is affected.

    What I suggest: try to fill the scratch with black ink to reduce light scattering and test the lens, it wouldn't surprise me if you could get decent results from it.

    Cheers,

    Abbazz

  5. #5
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,135
    Images
    20
    I looked through that 200-500 once and wasn't too impressed with it, but I didn't actually try it with film.

    Some of the Tamron SP lenses are quite good. The SP 90/2.5 and 2.8 Macro is one of the sharpest lenses in its class. The SP 35-105/2.8 ASP constant aperture zoom is a first rate lens. There are professionals who have used the SP 300/2.8. I have a Tamron SP 17mm lens that's quite good as well. I don't own the 300, but I have the others.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  6. #6
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kennedy View Post
    While I was visiting my local camera shop a bag of Tamron gear was dropped of for assement
    One lens is a 200-500 f6.9 apaptall mount which weighs a ton.Has anyone used one? Venture an opinion?
    Lens #2 is a Tamron 80-210 3.8 adaptall with a huge scratch on the front element.More like a gouge really.That lens was given to me (thanks eh?). Any way to make this glass usable?

    Thank You
    All I can tell you is that I bought a later iteration of the 200-500 on e-bay recently. This is from the SP series, uses an Adaptall 2 mount and has a constant aperture of f5.6. To be honest, I didn't realize quite how heavy this lens was before I bought it, but my initial impressions are good and I mean to try it out for motor racing pix some time soon. I have found the SP series (of which I have 4 examples) consistently good.

    I have one or two non-SP zooms around the place, acquired in package deals - these can be quite mediocre!

    Regards,

    David

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA., U.S.A.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    228

    Try Tamron's 200 mm - 400 mm f 5.6 Constant aperture Zoom.

    Quote Originally Posted by David H. Bebbington View Post
    All I can tell you is that I bought a later iteration of the 200-500 on e-bay recently. This is from the SP series, uses an Adaptall 2 mount and has a constant aperture of f5.6. To be honest, I didn't realize quite how heavy this lens was before I bought it, but my initial impressions are good and I mean to try it out for motor racing pix some time soon. I have found the SP series (of which I have 4 examples) consistently good!
    Regards, David
    The 35 - 105 mm f 2.8 ASL, are outstanding lenses, as are the 90 mm Macro's & 300 mm f 2.8's.
    I've owned the first & third lenses.

    I also want to put in a good word for the earlier 200 mm - 400 mm f 5.6 Constant Aperture Zoom lens. Because it's f 5.6, AF works & it's not too heavy, or big compared to the later model.

    The problem with the 200 mm - 500 mm is that the aperture varies.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    268
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kennedy View Post
    While I was visiting my local camera shop a bag of Tamron gear was dropped of for assement
    One lens is a 200-500 f6.9 apaptall mount which weighs a ton.Has anyone used one? Venture an opinion?
    Lens #2 is a Tamron 80-210 3.8 adaptall with a huge scratch on the front element.More like a gouge really.That lens was given to me (thanks eh?). Any way to make this glass usable?

    Thank You
    I agree, the Tamron 200-400mm f5.6 AF lens is definitely better than the old manual 200-500, and supports AF and metering in current cameras. (expect to pay under $200 for a clean used one).

    As for the other lens, even a gouge in the front element is probably not a problem. The lens is quite probably useable as is. Although, it was never a GREAT lens, it is not too bad. The gouge will not show up in the images. The suggestion of filling the gouge with black india ink to cut down on flare is a good one. But it's market value is nill because even in good shape, it would only be worth around $25-30.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    795

    Tamron Lens Question

    There were two versions of the 80-210/3.8 Tamron Adaptall II. One had a built-in lens hood and the other came with a separate one. I have several of each and both are quite good. I have even had good luck using one of them with a Minolta 2X 300S teleconverter. The problem with a lens as slow as the 80-210/3.8 is that it can be difficult to focus. For this reason I prefer to use the lens with a camera which has interchangeable focusing screens. A grid type or plain matte screen will work well.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Florida Hill Country
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    11
    There was more than 1 version of this lens. The SP version of it is pretty decent though heavy.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin