Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,719   Posts: 1,514,841   Online: 885
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: please help :)

  1. #11
    copake_ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NYC or Copake or Tucson
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    4,092
    Images
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Kim Catton View Post
    Thanks a lot.. and don't worry... im not switching at all. Its what I do for a living that demands of me to buy a digital camera I only shoot film and I am constantly trying to perfect the art of B/W photography. I simply love the blend of art and chemistry. I would, at any time, prefer film over digital.

    regards, kim.
    Kim,

    This is a film site - but I appreciate your dilemma.

    With various "compromises" any film Nikkor lens will work on a Nikon DSLR (although really older manuals can be "tough" to use - at least that's the case with my D-70).

    Modern "film" AF Nikkors will work fine on a Nikon DSLR - but you need to adjust for the (roughly) 1.5x's lens factor on the focal length.

  2. #12
    Pavel+'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    93
    Images
    2
    Snegron ... which F did you get? I'm currently evaluating different films but especially 400 B&W to see how different the look with regards to grain and tonality is between the F100 I have and the Mamiya 645 AF to see if I want to buy lenses for the Mamiya first or get another F100 (while I drool over the F6 when I sleep) I don't know what to expect yet .... so I'm on hold until I try out the results back to back with these two systems - to see which works better for me. I kind of hope its the 35mm as I like the portability and the use of all my lenses ... but at first impression there really does seem to be a difference worth the extra effort with medium format. So what did you get?
    To find the answers .... Question them!

  3. #13
    snegron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Hot, Muggy, Florida
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    787
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavel+ View Post
    Snegron ... which F did you get? I'm currently evaluating different films but especially 400 B&W to see how different the look with regards to grain and tonality is between the F100 I have and the Mamiya 645 AF to see if I want to buy lenses for the Mamiya first or get another F100 (while I drool over the F6 when I sleep) I don't know what to expect yet .... so I'm on hold until I try out the results back to back with these two systems - to see which works better for me. I kind of hope its the 35mm as I like the portability and the use of all my lenses ... but at first impression there really does seem to be a difference worth the extra effort with medium format. So what did you get?
    I ordered an F body (circa 1972, without the Nippon Kogaku logo on the top plate), no prism (I have a standard, non metring prism in near mint condition waiting to be placed on it), a J series focusing screen, and a Nikon 50mm 1.4 S-C, non AI lens. At first I wanted to get the body with the Nippon Kogaku logo on it, but then I thought about it and came to the conclusion that I want to use this new-to-me F as much as possible without thinking about its collectible value. In other words, I plan to use it, not display it on a shelf as a conversation piece!

    I have another F with an FTN Photomic meter head. The meter actually works ( I even got the special Wein Cell batteries for it) and the camera feels fantastic. Problem is that it is really heavy, and just carrying around the extra weight for metering purposes is not much fun. I could have just put the standard prism on that body, but I am too excited about this recent F I ordered!

    As far as medium format goes, you will see a world of difference with your 645 shots vs your 35mm images. Let me know how it turns out for you. My guess is that you will be astonished by the overall image quality of your 645 negatives.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavel+ View Post
    Snegron ... which F did you get?
    There is only one F...

    Cheers,

    R.

  5. #15
    snegron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Hot, Muggy, Florida
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    787
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Hicks View Post
    There is only one F...

    Cheers,

    R.
    Actually there were several variations of the F. I believe that there were many differences on the bodies throughout the production life of the F. The F body was about the same, but small changes on certain parts made some of the F's more desireable than others. There were the first ones without the red dot which could not be used with the metering heads, then there were the ones with the red dot that were produced for a short period of time that could accept the metering heads.

    There were many subtle differences that a true F collector (I am not worthy of being called one) can point out in a heartbeat. Look closely at F bodies produced in different years and you will see the variations as well. There was even the Apollo series where the F adopted a small cover on the self timer and film advance crank. These little differences appeal to collectors and have driven the prices of several F bodies through the roof. Don't even get me started on lens and body caps with the Nippon Kogaku logo!

    A wealth of information can be found at Richard DeStouts web page, http://homepage.hispeed.ch/destoutz/...ollection.html

    I think he is the true definition of a collector!

    I decided to get a late model F. It is a very basic example of the F without too much collector appeal (other than the standard prism which today sells more than the camera itself).

  6. #16
    Pavel+'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    93
    Images
    2
    Now I have to confess that the term "collector" has been in my mind a bit of a derogatory phrase. Is this for the shelf ... or are ya going to do with it ... what it was designed for?
    There are so many old bodies at my local camera stores ... the ones I had a hard time affording when I was young: affordable finnaly - so much so, that it is tempting to start to give them a new home ... one by one.

    But unfortunately I heard .... that film was dead.
    To find the answers .... Question them!

  7. #17
    snegron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Hot, Muggy, Florida
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    787
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavel+ View Post
    Now I have to confess that the term "collector" has been in my mind a bit of a derogatory phrase. Is this for the shelf ... or are ya going to do with it ... what it was designed for?
    There are so many old bodies at my local camera stores ... the ones I had a hard time affording when I was young: affordable finnaly - so much so, that it is tempting to start to give them a new home ... one by one.

    But unfortunately I heard .... that film was dead.
    You are lucky to have local camera stores that have old bodies for sale! Be careful though because there is a very thin line between buying a few old bodies, lenses, and accessories and obsessive collecting!

    I set out to buy an old rangefinder (Leica screwmount) for street shooting, but even at the lower prices of today, the F seemed to be a better bargain. Yes, it is louder, built to withstand a nuclear attack, weighs about as much as a Volkswagon, and stands out a bit more, but the lens compatibility and 100% bright viewfinder is worth it!

    My idea behind this recent purchase is to go out and shoot available light street shots. Yes, I could have done this with any of my other bodies, but I want to take away the simlicity of relying on meters and autoexposure. I wouldn't be able to do this with my F3HP because it meters in manual mode. It is too tempting to use the outstanding metering of the F3HP to get perfectly exposed shots. Much too easy to switch that dial on the F3HP to "A" for aperture priority mode.

    I think of using the meterless F as a photographic workout!

    p.s. My apologies to the OP for hijacking the thread!

  8. #18

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    Quote Originally Posted by snegron View Post
    Actually there were several variations of the F.
    OK, there are variations -- but as someone who's been using Fs for 30+ years (and owns five), it's still the F. I may be maligning the other poster but it looked to me very much as if he meant F2, F3 etc. At least one other took it the same way. But if I was wrong, I apologize.

    Cheers,

    Roger

  9. #19
    snegron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Hot, Muggy, Florida
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    787
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Hicks View Post
    OK, there are variations -- but as someone who's been using Fs for 30+ years (and owns five), it's still the F. I may be maligning the other poster but it looked to me very much as if he meant F2, F3 etc. At least one other took it the same way. But if I was wrong, I apologize.

    Cheers,

    Roger
    I guess it's just a matter of perspective (pun intended). I took it to mean which of the variations of the F I purchased. Remember also that Nikon marketed their F's as a new model everytime they changed a metering head. Their advertisements often showed the "new Nikon Photomic FTn" or whatever other new metering head they chose to add on that particular year. They had the same strategy with the F2 Photomic. It is reasonable to believe that some people might think that you might be purchasing a Nikon F Photomic, a Nikon F Photomic T, a Nikon F Photomic TN, a Nikon F2 Photomic S, etc., when in fact you are purchasing an F or F2 body with whatever prism.

  10. #20
    Pavel+'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    93
    Images
    2
    Roger ... to set the record straigh .. while I know there is an F .... I did take it as you thought and wanted to know if my buddy snegron bought an F or if he meant it in a more generic way and simply meant any nikon with the F something appelation. So you were right - but thats simply the way I read the original post.
    To find the answers .... Question them!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin