Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,872   Posts: 1,583,478   Online: 1087
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36

    Canon 50 mm f1.4 in Leica thread - any views?

    I have been trying to find a 50 mm lens for my Leica M which is "interestingly different" (already have a Summicron Mark III and a 50 mm f1.5 Nokton). I thought I had bought a Mark I Summicron but it turned out to be scratched too much to use (seller is refunding), so my gaze turned to a Canon f1.4. Someone called D. Colucci has a website on Canon lenses and seems to rate this lens very highly - anyone have experience and/or an opinion (preferably both!)?

    Regards,

    David

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Phoeinx Arizona
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,343
    Quote Originally Posted by David H. Bebbington View Post
    I have been trying to find a 50 mm lens for my Leica M which is "interestingly different" (already have a Summicron Mark III and a 50 mm f1.5 Nokton). I thought I had bought a Mark I Summicron but it turned out to be scratched too much to use (seller is refunding), so my gaze turned to a Canon f1.4. Someone called D. Colucci has a website on Canon lenses and seems to rate this lens very highly - anyone have experience and/or an opinion (preferably both!)?

    Regards,

    David
    I had the 50 1.4 with a Cannon 7S, I liked it better than the Summicron that I used with a IIIG, even wide open the Cannon 1.4 was very sharp. Other then the 28mm I felt the Cannon (35, 50, and 135) Ms were equal to Litz. I also had a Minolta 90 which was excellent. But for it is worth I liked the 7s better than the IIIG.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    173
    It's an excellent lens, well balanced on a Canon 7 so it should be fine on a Leica M. It is too big for the Barnack cameras and blocks much of the viewfinder.

    It uses a 48mm filter, which takes a little more looking to come up with filters.

    Not as sharp wide-open as a modern lens, but at F4 will give any lens a run for its money.

    Watch out for haze build up on the surface just behind the aperture blades. This is from oil deposits, and can destroy the coating and glass if not removed in time.

  4. #4
    Jim Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rural NW Missouri
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,860
    Through necessity I used the Canon 50mm f/1.4 from a Canon 7 wide open for indoor sports back when Tri-X was the preferred fast film (aside from the awful RE-2475). Exposure in small-town gyms was f1.4 at 1/125 second for decent shadow detail. Then Kodak produced T-Max 3200, and a Summicron at twice the shutter speed gave much sharper photos, despite larger grain. The shutter speed helped, although not as much as the superior lens. Probably my Canon would have been more competitive at smaller apertures, but certainly not wide open.

  5. #5
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36
    Thanks for info - as regards filters, there seem to be plenty of stepping rings around!

    Regards,

    David

  6. #6
    benjiboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    U.K.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,185
    I don't know about the 50mm 1.4 for the 7S David, but I have used the FDn version for about twenty years, and it's a better lens than I'm a photographer.
    Ben

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    173
    If you want a lens that is "interestingly different", you might look for a Sonnar formula lens rather than the Canon 50/1.4. The Canon 50/1.4 is a 6 element in 4 group "planar" formula lens. Most modern "fast' lenses follow this design.

    As an alternative, look at the Canon 50/1.5 and Nikkor 50/1.4 in LTM. These are 7 element in 3 group lenses. Zeiss recently resurrected a modern interpretation of this design. The Canon 50/1.5 renders the smoothest out-of-focus areas, the Nikkor is a bit sharper. The Canon 50/1.5 uses 40mm filters, which require some searching. It is a small lens, but works on a Leica M. It's so small that you can leave the hood on it and close the Leica ever-ready case. The Nikkor uses 43mm filters.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    Dear David,

    50/1.5 Sonnar (current). Stunning. I have asked Zeiss how much they want to let me keep it. Sorry we now live more than 5 miles apart or I'd let you try it (despite the Zeiss injunction never to let anyone else use a loaner lens).

    Cheers,

    Roger

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cambridge, MA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    895
    Quote Originally Posted by lens_hacker View Post
    If you want a lens that is "interestingly different", you might look for a Sonnar formula lens rather than the Canon 50/1.4. The Canon 50/1.4 is a 6 element in 4 group "planar" formula lens. Most modern "fast' lenses follow this design.

    As an alternative, look at the Canon 50/1.5 and Nikkor 50/1.4 in LTM. These are 7 element in 3 group lenses. Zeiss recently resurrected a modern interpretation of this design. The Canon 50/1.5 renders the smoothest out-of-focus areas, the Nikkor is a bit sharper. The Canon 50/1.5 uses 40mm filters, which require some searching. It is a small lens, but works on a Leica M. It's so small that you can leave the hood on it and close the Leica ever-ready case. The Nikkor uses 43mm filters.
    On the topic of the above Canon and Nikkor, here's a little comparison I found on the web:

    http://dantestella.com/technical/nikoleic.html

  10. #10
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Hicks View Post
    Dear David,

    50/1.5 Sonnar (current). Stunning. I have asked Zeiss how much they want to let me keep it. Sorry we now live more than 5 miles apart or I'd let you try it (despite the Zeiss injunction never to let anyone else use a loaner lens).

    Cheers,

    Roger
    Thanks for the thought, Roger. The Canon lens went on e-bay for close to £400, I dropped out a little short of this, couldn't quite bring myself to spend this kind of money on an antique lens when a new Zeiss Planar would have been within reach, with a Sonnar just a few $$$ more, although ideally I like lenses in screw mounts so that I can used them on my elderly Leicas as well.

    Regards,

    David

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin