recommend a standard zoom for Canon EOS
I had the Tamron 28-75/2.8 XR DI zoom for my Canons and was very satisfied with the results. Unfortunately is was stolen.
Now I'm in the market for a new standard zoom for traveling.
My requirements are:
- good optical quality, should give sharp slides at least down to f/4
- not too expensive (below 400€)
f/2.8 is not a requirement, but i found it to be quite convenient in case one needs it.
When I bought the last one 3 years ago I had a look in the Sigma 28-70 as well, but found it to be horribly noisy.
Zoom range: lower end 28mm is sufficient, upper range: well, as big as possible.
The lens is intended as a complement to a Canon 70-200/4L.
Any recommendations, except the obvious, buy a new Tamron?
Before I opened this I was going to suggest the tamron. Why are you against buying it again? Just looking for an opportunity to "upgrade?"
Your other option is probably the 24-70 f/2.8L which as you know isn't cheap. Or the 24-105 f/4L IS which again, isn't cheap. The 28-105 USM II is a great lens but of course it's variable aperture f/3.5-4.5 which might be mildy annoying under a few circumstances. I like mine though - sharp, small, fast AF, decent construction. Otherwise I don't know what your options are beyond those horrid 28-300 megazoom lenses.
The universe is a haunted house. -Coil
Thanks for the response, Walter.
I have nothing against the Tamron, I liked it. Just want to check, if there is another option I have overlooked that might suit my purposes better.
My ex took many wonderful pictures with the... 28-135 IS? About $300-400 if I remember correctly.
Though since you already have a 70-200, I'd be tempted by the 24-105. Actually, I wouldn't be tempted since I shoot with just a 28 and a 50
I've got a 28-105 f3.5-4.5 USM II. Light, reasonably compact, cheap, pretty sharp. It's not an L lens, but it's also not as heavy as an L lens. I've not tried the 28-135, but I've gotten the impression that it's not quite as sharp. The 28-105 IS fairly sharp (it doesn't blow me away in comparison to my 50/1.8 and 70-200 f4, but I don't cringe when I use it, either).
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
Sigma just came out with a 24-70/2.8 in the same price range as the Tamron, I think.
I've found that recently, the 17-40 f4 Cannon has become my standard lens.
There cant be that many subjects that you can't either get a little closer to and use the 40, or move a little further away from and use the 70
When my Canon lens ceased functioning a week outside warranty I bought the Tamron 28-75/2.8 XR DI zoom it really is a superb lens. That extra stop compared to an f4 lens makes a huge difference. If I was in your shoes I'd buy another.
Another vote for the Canon 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 USM II - As stated, not 'L' build quality, but a cracking lens none the less.
I 'upgraded' from this to the 24-105L and in all honesty didn't detect much of a difference, with the 'L' only just excelling in contrast and sharpness, but not by much.
Can't comment on the Tamron 28-75, but if you were happy with it before you might want to stick with it - It's about a stop faster, constant aperture and get pretty good reviews, although I've heard it can be a bit soft wide open.
"Another vote for the Canon 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 USM II."
And yet another.