I just unloaded a 28mm Nikkor lens and thought it had a flat front surface, under the UV filter I put on it. Might that be a front-located field flattener, usually seen at the back, analogous to reversed Tessar formulae - just designed differently?
Of course this would come up when I'm here in Tucson and the 28 is back in NYC.
Originally Posted by Murray@uptowngallery
But I keep grabbing Nikkor and 3rd party Nikon-compatible lenses I have here (quite a few) and still cannot find one with a flat front element.
Now, here in Tucson I have for my aging D-100 a AF-S Nikkor 18-70mm 1:3.5-4.5G ED.
I pulled off the filter and the front element "looks" like it's flat by a quick "eyeball" - but I ran a cloth across it - and it's curved, as one would expect.
Now, this is a digi lens but I did once mistakenly use it on my F-100. So I know it will vignette all the pics. Thus, it's unlikely that the OP is using this kind of lens on his F-100.
Might make more sense to this discussion if the OP would tell us what the lens is on his F-100?
So maybe it isn't flat. I am not an expert, that is why I am asking you...the experts. If I had put my glasses on I would have seen it wasn't flat. It is the first group of glass on the front end of the lense. It is a Nikon AF Nikkor - 28-105 1:3.5 - 4.5D.
As for the fellow worried about the speliing of lense/lens, I harbour no ill feelings towards him...my dad likes to argue with people about unimportant things too.
"You may well be correct but could you please provide a dictionary source for the word: lense[?"
Oxford English Dictionary (a history of the English language). A subscription is available online at http://www.oed.com/. This is an older version of the word "lens" but is still in common usage.
Good! Now I do not have to explain some of my typos!
Originally Posted by ehparis
Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!
Nothing beats a great piece of glass!
I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
fellow word nerds
As an English teacher I am amused and pleased with the etymological discussion of the word lense/lens. It shows there are intelligent people...peopling this board. Intelligent discussion is out of style now...just like film cameras. So, fellow nerds, any advice on the lense cleaning issue? It is not really a big fungal spot but I don't think or feel good about trying to dismantle the front of the lense myself. It is not on a polarizer or other filter, it is in the front element.
Maybe someone could instruct me how to get the front element of the lense out and I can clean it with some denatured alcohol.
Originally Posted by JBrunner
And as any NY Times crossword puzzle nut will tell you dictionary usage of "variant" or "Var." in a clue is a nice way of saying "misspelling".
Originally Posted by vollie
If you're certain it's inside the front element - I would not advise trying to open up the lens. Others here, with experience doing such, might try it - but the only time I "opened" a lens was by mistake because I'd screwed the darn filter on so tight that when I tried to unscrew it I opened up the front element!
Before you send it out for cleaning - you might try exposing the lens to direct sunlight for a few hours. This may kill off the fungus - especially since it sound like it has not advanced too far.
The problem is that even if this works, Tennessee is a humid climate and it's likely the fungus will return after awhile.
So, unless you want to open it up yourself, beyond the "sunlight" trick all I could recommend is sending it off for a professional cleaning.
Thanks, yes the UV will kill the fungus but I am still left with the residual mold.
I am looking for a specific recommended lense servicing center. Should i send it to Nikon?
Variant doesn't necessarily mean misspelling does it? It means...variant...another way.