Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,982   Posts: 1,523,841   Online: 993
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Jeffrey A. Steinberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Scarsdale, NY
    Posts
    296

    For portraits AIS 85/1.4 or AF 85/1.8

    I have to do a session tomorrow and I was going to use my standard setup: 85mm AIS/1.4 (big honker) on either my F3 or F4.

    Someone lent me an F5 which I have been using, and frankly I like the F4 better for some odd reason when using manual lenses (all I have).

    With the loaner F5 came an AF Nikkor 85/1.8. Its plastic, but what about the optics? Are they better than the AIS 1.4?

    I am voting for the old school, metal-built 85 AIS 1.4.

    Would others agree?
    --Jeffrey

    ______________________________________________
    Jeffrey Steinberg, K2MIT
    Scarsdale, NY

    www.jsteinbergphoto.com (my avocation)
    www.reversis.com (my vocation)

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Westminster, Maryland, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,504
    Use what you know, but don't miss the opportunity to do a free side-by-side test.

    A class oral report is due Tuesday. Grin.
    When I grow up, I want to be a photographer.

    http://www.walterpcalahan.com/Photography/index.html

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,067
    Seconded! Use the lens you know for the shoot then shoot comparison shots.

    I've always used the 105 for portraiture and I have to say my favourite remains the old 105mm f 2.5. I originally, (back when dinosaurs roamed the earth!!) bought the 105 1.8 and a few weeks later had the chance to compare he 2.5. In 35mm the 2.5 remains my favourite portrait lens. I even use it on my D200, (customer demand - not choice) for portraits. Don't know why but that lens is awesome.

    Have fun on the shoot.
    "Why is there always a better way?"

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hawaii
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    703
    I have the 1.4 Ais, the MF 1.8 H.C, and my wife's AF 1.8. Tested them all at the same time, on 100 speed chromes, tripod, cable release, mirror lockup, DG-2, two bodies and two rolls, all F-stops up to F8, shot at near middle and far-ish middle distances. At wide open, the 1.4 is better but not by much over the AF 1.8, the center is sharper on the 1.4 but the AF is more even over the whole frame. At F2, the 1.4 is clearly better, bokeh is clean and plane of sharpness extend over the whole frame, very nice overall look. The AF 1.8 and the old H.C 1.8 were pretty even at this point, the H.C had a bit 'different' signature to the bokeh, but sharpness was nearly the same. At F4-5.6, the differences between all lenses was so minute that I had to consult the notes to figure out which lens was used. I use and interchange between them all the time, taking the 1.4 when I need more wide open performance and the weight issue is minor, taking the 1.8 when I need the weight savings and less chance of a *critical* need for wide open performance. The AF is currently in 'need to be repaired' status, needs a good cleaning and perhaps a new mount.

  5. #5
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,079
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    For portraits, you may actually not want a bitingly sharp and contrasty lens like either of these. Shoot whichever you choose, you'll probably want to soften the print anyway, even if you shoot wide open.

    For side-by-side comparisons see photozone.de.
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    368
    Any one of those lenses will give superb results. I love and still use my ancient 105 f/2.5

    Kiron Kid

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,067
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiron Kid View Post
    Any one of those lenses will give superb results. I love and still use my ancient 105 f/2.5

    Kiron Kid
    Easy there. That lens may be ancient - but it's younger than me. The truth hurts
    "Why is there always a better way?"

  8. #8
    Nicole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,548
    Images
    8
    Jeffrey I have the 1.8 and am happy with the results. Testing is always best.

  9. #9
    PhotoJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Regina, SK, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,221
    I have the 1.8. It's a fantastic lens. I hear the 1.4 is better though, but I've never used it.

    If you're comfortable focusing manually (and I assume you must be ), use your /1.4, but do play with the 1.8 to see how you like it.

    The F5 is a great camera, but if your F4 is in good condition, it is a better body to use with manual-focus lenses, unquestionably.
    Jim MacKenzie - Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

    A bunch of Nikons; Feds, Zorkis and a Kiev; Pentax 67-II (inherited from my deceased father-in-law); Bronica SQ-A; and a nice Shen Hao 4x5 field camera with 3 decent lenses that needs to be taken outside more. Oh, and as of mid-2012, one of those bodies we don't talk about here.

    Favourite film: do I need to pick only one?

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by BobNewYork View Post
    Easy there. That lens may be ancient - but it's younger than me. The truth hurts
    Actually, the original Nikkor 105 f/2.5, was designed in 1959, the same year that I was born. So I guess that makes me ancient too. :rolleyes: I'm using the first edition 105, and love it.

    Kiron Kid

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin