Wide angle lens for OM?
Hello, I recently started photography as a hobby and I need some advice. I have an Olympus OM10 with the classic 50mm f/1.8 lens. I am happy with my camera and I just need a wide angle lens to get these photos that I can't get with the 50mm. I'm thinking about getting the 28mm f/2.8. It seems to be reasonably priced. I also have a Hoya linear polariser (the regular, not HMC or Pro). So, has anybody used this lens? Will I have a problem with vigneting if I use it with the polariser on? Is it sharp, or is it kind of... blury?
Thanks in advance!
The 28 f2.8 is an excellent lens. If you use a polariser there should be no vignetting. I made the attached photographs with Olympus OM-1, Zuiko 28mm f2.8 and a polarising filter.
Ps. Welcome to APUG.
Anáil nathrach, ortha bháis is beatha, do chéal déanaimh.
I have the Zuiko 28mm f/2.8 and Tamron 28mm f/2.5, both very good - there are several pictures from Greece in my gallery using a Polariser with no vignetting problems.
If you use a lens hood you will need a special wide-angle one to avoid vignetting.
"Well, my name's Jim. But, most people call me . . . Jim"
Wow! Instant reply The photos look nice. I like these clouds. And no vignetting evident. Time to order one...
Oh, thanks a lot!
The 24mm is also an excellent lens and very sharp too.
Norman is an island.Time and tide wait for Norman.
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
I prefer a 24mm lens personally, but a 28 is a really good focal length for a first wide angle lens. Some find 24 to be too wide.
28 is much, much wider than 50 so you will find it to be a big help. The prices are also pretty attractive.
Jim MacKenzie - Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
A bunch of Nikons; Feds, Zorkis and a Kiev; Pentax 67-II (inherited from my deceased father-in-law); Bronica SQ-A; and a nice Shen Hao 4x5 field camera with 3 decent lenses that needs to be taken outside more. Oh, and as of mid-2012, one of those bodies we don't talk about here.
Favourite film: do I need to pick only one?
Good and reasonable suggestions here.
The best OM wideangle I have in terms of contrast and sharpness is the 24/2.8 but I often find it too wide.
The 28/2.8 is a close second and don't dismiss the Tamron 28/2.5 mentioned above also, that's one unassuming, but excellent lens.
Yes, 24mm seem to be very nice, but I did a bit of research on the internet and I got the impression that it is exactly at the point where distortion gets a bit evident. Am I wrong? The 24mm f2.8 is also reasonably priced and well within my budget (80 euros for the 28mm, 100 for the 24mm from ffordes), but you get about 8 degrees more field of view and a bit more distortion. Any comments?
Originally Posted by PhotoJim
There are at least two versions of the OM Zuiko 28mm lens. I'm surprised no one mentioned the older, less expensive, and sharper 28mm f3.5.
Originally Posted by Anon Ymous
I got one for around $50 US and it's great. You can see some shots here:
They are shot with Efke IR film and thus don't really showcase the sharpness and contrast of this little gem of a lens. But there is a Zuiko 28mm group on flickr.com you should check out.
I used my Zuiko 24mm f/2.8 for this shot from my APUG gallery:
Personally, I like the field of view of a 35mm lens - generally that is my "standard" lens. My current and favorite kit is 24mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2.0 and 85mm f/2.0 - all Zuiko.
I used one of my Zuiko 35mm f/2.0 lenses for this shot from my APUG gallery:
For years I used a 28mm f/3.5 lens, a 50mm f/1.8 lens and a 135mm f/3.5 lens (all Zuiko), but I prefer my current kit - not because of quality concerns, but definitely because of size, and speed.
Whoops - I just realized that you are not a subscriber, so you won't be able to look at my gallery photos. I'll attempt to post the 24mm photo here:
Originally Posted by Anon Ymous
Last edited by MattKing; 02-08-2008 at 12:24 AM. Click to view previous post history.