Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 76,269   Posts: 1,680,898   Online: 981
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11
    Bill R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Missouri
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9
    That's a good question. Does anyone know if the SB400 is compatible?

  2. #12
    lns
    lns is offline

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    434
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill R View Post
    That's a good question. Does anyone know if the SB400 is compatible?
    I think that flash is only compatible with digital cameras, so I'd say no.

    -Laura

  3. #13
    23mjm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Rocklin, California
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    450
    Images
    9
    NO the SB400 and F100 don't mix I have them and was bummed.

  4. #14
    Marc Akemann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor area, Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,272
    Images
    4
    Ted,

    Years ago, when all I had was a simple Nikon EM, and I would run into a few extra dollars to spend, my first thought was "...glass, glass, glass!" What lens could I get? Is there a lens you'd like to have over an F100? If not, the F100 is a nice and worthwhile step up.

    Marc

  5. #15
    ted_smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    uk
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    396
    Images
    1
    Thanks all. Very useful replies. A few points to note :

    1) I have a Nikon SB-800 flash gun which, as far as I know, will work with the F100
    2) I don't have the cash lying around as such, more's the pitty. I'm just always looking to better my kit where I can and was wondering whether it was 'worth' upgrading from the F80 to F100.
    3) Glass wise : FilmSprocket - I am with you 100% there. All my major investments have been in glass. My Nikon 80-200 2.8 was my most 'serious' expenditure in that regard. But I have the Macro 60mm prime (from new), Standard 50mm (from new) and the SuperWide 20mm too - all of which seem like great lenses so far.
    4) Price wise - I think the prices I quoted where from e-Bay. Not sure now though because having just done a search again they do all seem to be >£200

    I will give it some more thought and have a ponder, as well as reading a side-by-side comparison.
    Ted Smith Photography
    Hasselblad 501CM...my 2nd love.

  6. #16
    Marc Akemann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor area, Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,272
    Images
    4
    Ted you've got some really nice lenses there, so, getting the F100 makes sense if you can swing it.

    The F100 is much better built than the N80.
    The F100 can meter with mf AI & AIS lenses (N80 doesn't). This may more important for me than for you, I don't know.
    The F100 auto-focuses faster.
    The F100 flash synch is 1/250 while the N80's is 1/125 of a second.
    The F100 uses the more common AA batteries.
    The F100 viewfinder shows 96% while the N80 shows only 92% of a scene.
    The F100 does exposure compensation by thirds of a stop rather than the N80's 1/2 stop increments. (Third stop increments are my choice, may not be an issue for you, though.)
    And lastly, the F100 weighs a little more but I relate that with added quality in this case.

    I associate the F100 closely to the F5. I do not associate the N80 with the F5. So, with the lenses you already have, you'd have a really great set-up if you added an F100 to your equipment list.

    I hope that helps!

    Marc

    Quote Originally Posted by ted_smith View Post
    Thanks all. Very useful replies. A few points to note :

    1) I have a Nikon SB-800 flash gun which, as far as I know, will work with the F100
    2) I don't have the cash lying around as such, more's the pitty. I'm just always looking to better my kit where I can and was wondering whether it was 'worth' upgrading from the F80 to F100.
    3) Glass wise : FilmSprocket - I am with you 100% there. All my major investments have been in glass. My Nikon 80-200 2.8 was my most 'serious' expenditure in that regard. But I have the Macro 60mm prime (from new), Standard 50mm (from new) and the SuperWide 20mm too - all of which seem like great lenses so far.
    4) Price wise - I think the prices I quoted where from e-Bay. Not sure now though because having just done a search again they do all seem to be >£200

    I will give it some more thought and have a ponder, as well as reading a side-by-side comparison.

  7. #17
    kram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    104
    the F100 can take IR film (not muchof that around now) 'cos it has a metal back. If the F80 has a plastic back that is another reason.

  8. #18
    PhotoJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Regina, SK, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,223
    Quote Originally Posted by kram View Post
    the F100 can take IR film (not muchof that around now) 'cos it has a metal back. If the F80 has a plastic back that is another reason.
    The back isn't the issue (the F601 has a plastic back and I shot IR film in it without any problems at all). The issue is the infrared-based film transport system that the F80 has. The F100's system uses sprockets.
    Jim MacKenzie - Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

    A bunch of Nikons; Feds, Zorkis and a Kiev; Pentax 67-II (inherited from my deceased father-in-law); Bronica SQ-A; and a nice Shen Hao 4x5 field camera with 3 decent lenses that needs to be taken outside more. Oh, and as of mid-2012, one of those bodies we don't talk about here.

    Favourite film: do I need to pick only one?

  9. #19
    kram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    104
    Cheers Jim, at the back of my mind I knew about the counting system in the F80, but I was under the false assumption (as it turns out) the the plastic back was the main reason for IR not being suitable for the F80 - I stand corrected.

  10. #20
    snegron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Hot, Muggy, Florida
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    808
    Quote Originally Posted by kram View Post
    the F100 can take IR film (not muchof that around now) 'cos it has a metal back. If the F80 has a plastic back that is another reason.
    The F100 has a plastic back. This is the weak spot (IMHO) on the F100. Everything else is made of metal except for the plastic back.

    As far as upgrading goes, I believe that it is a matter of personal preference and intended use. The F80 (or N80 as it is known here in the U.S.A.) is a very reliable camera and has the advantage of being one of Nikon's lightest SLR's. If you plan on shooting all day, lighter weight might make a difference. The F100 is heavier, larger, and has much better weather sealing and AF functions.

    I have both and I think I have used the N80 more, mostly because of the light weight. Funny thing I just realized is that I think I have only shot about 5 rolls of film with my F100 after buying it new a little over a year ago. It is a great camera, but for some reason it feels too much like a pro DSLR. I enjoy using my old Nikon F with FTN finder much more.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin