Discussions: 45,168 | Messages: 609,081 | Members: 29,928 | Online: 214 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Two Loupes
Author: david b
22 view(s)
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1112 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
638 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
956 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > 35mm Cameras and Accessories > Recommendations for cheap SLR + 35mm lens

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2008, 12:30 AM   #41 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
Default

The shutter capacitor in the Minolta X700 fails from not being used. You need to fire the shutter every few months to keep it happy. I had one repaired & that's what the repairman told me. I guess it's like on a leaf shutter - you have to exercise it.
jime11 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-15-2008, 02:38 AM   #42 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 48
Default

You are in a great place : 1)you want to buy a 35MM SLR and it is a buyers market even for the high end lightly used stuff.
2) There are more good options than there are bad ones, so it is a mater of personal choice.
I nominate the Nikon FM or FM2 for the following reasons :
1) great glass and a wide selection.
2) reasonably compact and in spite of a traditinal,non "ergonomic" design it feels very nice when you hold it.
3) Mechanical operation: if you end up with dead batteries all you lose is built in meter. you still have flash sync at 250th /sec and with thre FM2 a top shutter speed of 4000th/sec!
Most other features you would get with the other top choices ,like depth of field preview,self timer ,single stroke advance,diopters for finder eye piece,data backs ,motors you get the idea. have fun deciding.
Davesw is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-15-2008, 10:54 AM   #43 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 329
Default I beleve this is incorrect

Quote:
Originally Posted by jime11 View Post
The shutter capacitor in the Minolta X700 fails from not being used. You need to fire the shutter every few months to keep it happy. I had one repaired & that's what the repairman told me. I guess it's like on a leaf shutter - you have to exercise it.
Two aging cameras have "known" faults, Canon's superb T-90 and Minolta's X-700. In the T-90's case the problem has something to do with magnets and apparently, exercising the shutter once in a while keeps the problem at bay. In the Minolta's case, the capacitor has liquid inside that simply dries out. No amount of exercise can prevent it, it just happens.
__________________
Nothing worth doing is ever easy.
Wolfeye is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-15-2008, 01:18 PM   #44 (permalink)
 
Chazzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Posts: 677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jime11 View Post
The shutter capacitor in the Minolta X700 fails from not being used. You need to fire the shutter every few months to keep it happy. I had one repaired & that's what the repairman told me. I guess it's like on a leaf shutter - you have to exercise it.
Maybe I should have bought an XD11, but I love the X-700. As it happens, it is not operational right now, and now I know that it could be the capacitor problem. I hope that fresh capacitors of the correct kind for the camera are still available.
__________________
Charles Hohenstein
Chazzy is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-15-2008, 03:40 PM   #45 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 329
Default I have a few

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chazzy View Post
Maybe I should have bought an XD11, but I love the X-700. As it happens, it is not operational right now, and now I know that it could be the capacitor problem. I hope that fresh capacitors of the correct kind for the camera are still available.
If you want to try the repair yourself, and are handy with a soldering iron, I believe I still have a few lying around. Let me know.
__________________
Nothing worth doing is ever easy.
Wolfeye is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 05-15-2008, 03:46 PM   #46 (permalink)
 
frdrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Just outside Prague
Posts: 54
Default

I'd go for a Yashica FX series SLR with a Zeiss 35 mm Distagon.
frdrx is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-16-2008, 02:23 PM   #47 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 10
Default

There don't seem to be too many fast (faster than 2.8) 35mm primes available for SLRs compared with rangefinders. Maybe I should just get a 1.4 or 1.7 35mm for my rangefinder and keep my gear to a minimum.
briandaly is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-16-2008, 04:03 PM   #48 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 70
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by briandaly View Post
Maybe I should just get a 1.4 or 1.7 35mm for my rangefinder and keep my gear to a minimum.
But that's the simple option, and doesn't give you the chance to expand your kit

Seriously, if you're happy with RF shooting then that would be the most obvious next step. But will a fast lens really be the answer? They're big, bulky and expensive.
Simon E is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-16-2008, 04:47 PM   #49 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Alingsås, Sweden
Posts: 30
Default

You can't go wrong with a Nikon FE2 and a Nikkor AI-S 50mm f1.8. If that's too expensive for you, then look at a Nikon FE which can meter with the cheaper non-AI lenses. Expect to give it a CLA unless that has been done already. (All FE/FE2:s are due for light seals replacement.) Also consider adding a 105mm f2.5 and a 28mm f2.8 for a nice walk-around kit.

Regards,
Erik Ehrling (Sweden)
Erik Ehrling is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-16-2008, 08:05 PM   #50 (permalink)
 
MattKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Delta, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 2,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by briandaly View Post
There don't seem to be too many fast (faster than 2.8) 35mm primes available for SLRs compared with rangefinders. Maybe I should just get a 1.4 or 1.7 35mm for my rangefinder and keep my gear to a minimum.
It is not inexpensive, but I really like my 35mm f/2.0 Zuiko lens for my Olympus OM bodies. It is pretty small, as well (at least compared with other, non Olympus lenses).

Matt
MattKing is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using