Discussions: 45,168 | Messages: 609,082 | Members: 29,928 | Online: 213 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Two Loupes
Author: david b
22 view(s)
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1112 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
638 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
956 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > 35mm Cameras and Accessories > Olympus XA if I already have a Stylus Epic?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-2008, 07:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Markok765's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,896
Blog Entries: 1
Default Olympus XA if I already have a Stylus Epic?

I have a Stylus Epic, and it's great. I was thinking of getting a XA for the manual control, and the fact that it is way quieter than my Stylus epic.

What do you guys think?
__________________
Marko Kovacevic
Blog
Youtube
Markok765 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-22-2008, 08:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Barry S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: DC Metro
Posts: 213
Default

I've owned both cameras and I have a real soft spot for the XA. The Epic probably has a better lens, but you can't beat the aperture control and the overall feel of using the XA.
Barry S is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-22-2008, 08:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 391
Default

I'm not sure if others have had similar problems as I have, but I purchased 2 XA's last summer and both the film winders snapped off within 3 months. It was stupid of me to try to wind the film even though there was obvious resistance... I tried to save the photos but most of them ended up getting ruined anyways.

I paid $70 a piece too

Best of luck!
jasonjoo is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-22-2008, 08:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Markok765's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,896
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonjoo View Post
I'm not sure if others have had similar problems as I have, but I purchased 2 XA's last summer and both the film winders snapped off within 3 months. It was stupid of me to try to wind the film even though there was obvious resistance... I tried to save the photos but most of them ended up getting ruined anyways.

I paid $70 a piece too

Best of luck!
Someone on APUG is selling one if you want. Look on the classified section.
__________________
Marko Kovacevic
Blog
Youtube
Markok765 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-22-2008, 09:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 391
Default

Yes, I was considering it, but I already have 2 XA paperweights at home

I've also been bitten by the LF bug, so most of my investments are going to that medium at the moment. This analog stuff sure isn't cheap

Jason
jasonjoo is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 07-22-2008, 10:07 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
df cardwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dearborn,Michigan & Cape Breton Island
Posts: 2,569
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonjoo View Post
I'm not sure if others have had similar problems as I have, but I purchased 2 XA's last summer and both the film winders snapped off within 3 months.
Twenty years later, mine works fine.
df cardwell is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-22-2008, 10:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
Eric Rose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 3,165
Default

I loved my XA2 but alas it died a sudden death. Well not really dead, just wouldn't get off the self timer mode. A real hassle to say the least. I took the entire camera apart to see if I could fix it and found out two things; 1. the XA2 is a very well built camera, 2. I couldn't fix it. So it went into the trash all in pieces. Naturally I said a few words over the trash can in loving memory.
__________________
Everyone gets everything he wants. I wanted a mission, and for my sins
they gave me one. Brought it up to me like room service. - Willard

www.ericrose.com
Eric Rose is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-22-2008, 11:05 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 474
Default

If the price is right, I say go for it. I've owned both (and managed to break both), and I have to say the XA's weak point is the rangefinder spot - it's very small, and ends up being dim-to-very-dim when not in bright light (eg, indoors), which makes focusing challenging. However, aperture priority can be a very handy thing, the meter is usually quite accurate, and it has a handy +1.5 EV "backlight" switch. So, it really depends what kind of photography you'll be using it for.

(Incidentally, I broke both a Stylus Epic and an XA on a vacation last year - still not sure how, as both were in my carry-on, but both ended up DOA...)
__________________
Semper ubi sub ubi.
mabman is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-22-2008, 11:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Snohomish County, Washington State, USA
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by df cardwell View Post
Twenty years later, mine works fine.
Same here after 25+ years. Both my original XA and the A16 flash continue to work flawlessly. Although I did once several years ago have to open up the flash unit and pinpoint solder a small wire back into place. I relooped that wire such that it will never fatigue and break again.

Other than that, perfection. Both pieces still even look brand new. As does the original case and uncreased owner's manual. What a sweet little gem of a camera.

Ken
Ken Nadvornick is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-24-2008, 12:24 AM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 88
Default

Definately go for the XA (any of them). The Stylus was designed with a completely different philosophy. It is a snapshot camera intended for the real amateur. It uses extremely high shutter speeds and the aperture is wide open with 100 speed film and even a light overcast. It wants to use the flash even in daylight. The exposure with the flash is dead on, though. Mine also overexposes by about 1/3 stop, adding to the open aperture to make the photos look even softer. It is obviously intended for shooting people, not landscapes or scenics.

The photos from the XA (XA2, in my case) are razor sharp with wonderful contrast and color. It's shutter is practically silent, with no vibration. I've easily hand held it down to 1/8 sec.
__________________
Tim Huggins

www.thermojetstove.com/natureshots
thuggins is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 AM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using