|
|
|
-
I'm getting the sense that this is some sort of riddle.
 Originally Posted by JBrunner
Her red dress always came out black.
On what basis did she judge the overexposure?
-
What Nikon camera was that? Sounds like a symptom an old Photomic meter might exhibit if it was failing.
-
Guess I missed the deadline...
-
[QUOTE=tiberiustibz;756616]I'm getting the sense that this is some sort of riddle.
******
In a sense it was because one has to go from where the person asking for a solution to the problem is "at." They can't always provide the info we need to solve the problem in the first go around. I used to try to train the kids who worked for me to speak "customereeze." This was not a pro shop with professional customers; just every day people. Learning to ask the right questions was very important.
John, Mount Vernon, Virginia USA
-
 Originally Posted by rthomas
What Nikon camera was that? Sounds like a symptom an old Photomic meter might exhibit if it was failing.
******
Don't remember. I know it was not an F, though; a Photomic would stick in my memory. Some of the various situations were pretty amusing: like the lady who insisted the lab "had mixed her pictures up with someone elses." Yup, it happens. And she got half a roll of her pix, and some of another person's. Yup, that happens to. And, not only that, the lab mixed up her pictures with her mother's pictures. Hmmm, sez I to meself, sez I as I put the tracer book back.. It transpired they were on vacation together; with the same P and S cameras; Is it possible, I finally ask, that perhaps you just picked up her camera by mistake one day......???. Oh, yeh, I guess that's it, sez she.
John, Mount Vernon, Virginia USA
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
I have a couple of Olympus bodies that feature metering off the film. I've always wondered if there is any significant variation of reflectivity between film types. I was going to suggest that as a cause, if no one else came up with a solution.
Matt
-
 Originally Posted by MattKing
I have a couple of Olympus bodies that feature metering off the film. I've always wondered if there is any significant variation of reflectivity between film types. I was going to suggest that as a cause, if no one else came up with a solution.
Matt
*****
That's an interesting point, Matt. One would ASS u ME that the emulsion reflectance would be pretty consistent; but I wonder......
John, Mount Vernon, Virginia USA
-
There are slight differences between films, yes.
So you need to learn how your favourite films behave, and possibly adjust your metering accordingly.
Old data, but illustrative all the same:
-
Is that data from Olympus? I understand that most common-speed exposures were actualy metered mostly off the shutter curtains, and only longer tripod-domain exposures metered off the film itself.
-
It's data from Hasselblad, to be used with their OTF flash metering.
They measured the reflectivity of the films available then.
You're partly right about the curtains.
Anything of 1/60 and longer is meassured entirely (or as near as) off film.
Faster speeds progressively more off the curtains, increasingly less off the film.
P.S.
Or have i got it wrong now, and is the OTF measuring only used for longer speeds indeed?
Last edited by Q.G.; 02-22-2009 at 12:17 PM. Click to view previous post history.
|
|