Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,929   Posts: 1,556,841   Online: 868
      
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24
  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    22

    After recommendations for a 24mm or 35mm lens for my FE2

    I recently thought about selling my Nikon FE2 and the 35-105 Nikkor zoom because I don't really use them enough, but when it came to the crunch I realised what a superb camera it is and I decided to keep it.

    But the lens is a different matter - it's too heavy for my liking so I want to replace it with a prime that will make it a more manageable package. I've got most focal lengths covered with either Pentax or Olympus gear (20, 28, 40, 50, 100, 135 and 70-210) so there doesn't seem any point in replicating those on the Nikon. A 24mm or 35mm would be good but a quick check on Ebay shows that they seem quite expensive.

    Can anyone recommend a good quality non-Nikon 24mm or 35mm that won't cost me a fortune. Or is there a good macro lens that might be worth considering?

    And I'm open to suggestions about lenses that I might have overlooked completely.

    Or should I just bite the bullet and sell the FE2 and the zoom?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Western Arkansas
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    17

    Nikkor Lens

    Carlb, I have a pretty good selection of Nikkors which I use on my F2 but one of my favorites.............for its speed and lightness is the Nikkor 24mm f2.0.
    Gary Blackshare

    Nikon F2, DP-1
    Various Nikkor lenses,
    20 - 1000mm
    Mamiya RB67 Pro S
    90 f3.8 C, 180 f4.5 C,
    250 f4.5 C


    He who laughs last is worth two in the bush.

  3. #3
    Poohblah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    433
    I am of the opinion that having too many lenses is a bad thing, but that's just personal preference.

    That said, I suggest searching for a 24mm lens and getting rid of that massive ol' zoom.

  4. #4
    Mick Fagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,844
    Images
    29
    Sigma Super-Wide II f2.8 24mm. Very good value for money.

    I bought mine new around 1984 as a lead in until I could afford a better Nikkor lens, I haven't worried about getting the Nikkor as whilst the Nikkor 24 mm lenses are generally better, they aren't that much better.

    I also have the 35 - 105 Nikkor zoom lens, dog of a lens, I also bought that new as well. It's my loaner to students I'm personally teaching, so far none of them has even considered it after using some of the prime lenses.

    You'll love the Sigma, it clicks in half stops and focuses the same way as Nikkor optics, plus it runs 52mm filters. If you are really lucky you'll get the heavily scalloped lens hood which came as standard with the lens, it clips in, not a screw in.

    I believe that this particular Sigma lens goes for something between $50 - $85 USD or around $100 AUD

    Mick.

  5. #5
    Lukas_87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Prague, Czech Republic (Europe)
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    114
    Images
    2
    if you are not rich then get the ai nikkor 2/35
    or 1.4/35 if you are rich
    or the modern af 2/35 - better optics than ai/ais 2/35 but plastic feeling. and bigger price.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN US
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,305
    Images
    4
    IMHO, there is a world of difference between a 24mm and a 35mm. So, if you want to use your FE2 as a "specialized" wide angle camera, I'd go for the 24mm (but why, if you have 20 and 28 on your other systems). If you want a relatively small, somewhat wide lens for general use (i.e. "street shooting") I'd go with the 35/2 or equivalent.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    410
    ****Sigma Super-Wide II f2.8 24mm. Very good value for money.***

    Well I second that, if you can get it cheap...and I reckon £15-£20 would be about right, got mine for £10 inc postage last year.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    329
    Tamron makes a wonderful 24mm f2.5 adaptall lens. Tack sharp even wide open, with little distortion.

  9. #9
    Roger Thoms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    853
    Images
    7
    I'll put in a vote for 24mm focal length for a wide angle, a personal favorite.
    Roger

  10. #10
    Chaplain Jeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    172
    Hello,

    The Nikkor 24mm is a great lens - I have the f/2.8 AIc. Just be aware that it is a REAL wide angle lens and you will have all sorts of headaches if you shoot scenes of church steeples, etc., if you're not careful about what you're doing. The lens will bend the steeple backwards if you don't shoot straight. This was the lens that prompted me to buy the grid screen for each of my Nikon bodies.

    Personally I prefer the 28mm lenses, but I am probably in a minority here. I use the 28mm on SLRs and RFs as my standard lens on about 85% of my shooting.

    I almost never use a 35mm length lens. Too narrow for wide and too wide for portraits.
    Jeff M


    M3, M5, CLE, Minolta XE7, Minolta Maxxum 9, Minolta Maxxum 9000, Nikon F3HP, etc., etc.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin