Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,667   Posts: 1,481,716   Online: 804
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Minolta XG-7

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    6
    Have any of you ever had much success with this model? Interested in all the pros and cons. Have a 50mm and 135mm lens.
    I dream of little blue men.

  2. #2
    Ed Sukach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,520
    Images
    26
    I haven't, specifically, but one of my student-mentorees used one ... Some really spectacular work from that puppy.

    I may get a little flak for this, but I think the Minoltas, Nikons, Canons, Pentax(note the LX) and Olympus (and certainly many others) from that era were all nearly equal in quality and "nicety" - and that is to say, at the TOP of the scale.
    Carpe erratum!!

    Ed Sukach, FFP.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    6,242
    I used an XG7 as my first 35 mm camera. Where in Kansas are you located? I live in Wichita. Alex Hawley is a Kansan as well. I'm sure that there are others.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    6
    I am from near Hutchinson, but I have friends and family in Wichita. I am starting a Central Kansas Photography club, so let me know if you or any of your friends are interested. We could rotate where we meet.
    I dream of little blue men.

  5. #5
    Seele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    194
    The XG-7 is a competent camera, even though it played second-fiddle to the XD-11 when it came out, but it became the founder of main Minolta line when Leica hogged the XD-11 chassis. It uses CdS as metering sensor, and when switched over to manual it cuts off the exposure meter altogether so it can be a little frustrating. The main circuit board has two capacitors which will fail, if they haven't already done so, due to age, and a lot of problems can be solved by replacing them; in fact a routine procedure by Minolta when they go back for servicing.

    The XG-7 should be a "first type" chassis model, the "second chassis" is the same as the later X-series which is still current. If you can live with the peculiarities of this camera, I cannot see why it will fail to be a fully satisfactory machine for effective picture making.

  6. #6
    arthurpolaroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Worcester, Massachusetts
    Shooter
    Instant Films
    Posts
    33
    The XG-7 was my Dad's 1st SLR, the camera that started my family on it's photographic journey. He later sold it to a fellow engineer when he decided to go Nikon, with the FE/FE-2. I just bought a XG-7, with the 50mm f/1.4 Rokkor, and fell so in love with it that I bid for and won an XD-11. The only "complaint" I might have with the XG-7 is the light meter is somewhat slow to respond. You can actually see the coupling pin move and slide. Aside from that? The camera is a joy to use.

  7. #7
    fstop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    652
    The XG series get the job done if you prefer to work in aperture priority. An XG is my favorite for outdoor car shows.

  8. #8
    drumminor2nd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    45
    I'm not a huge fan of the XG series. I have one (an XG-1) and with the meter shutting off if you go to manual, it kind of defeats the point of having a meter. I find my FE far superior (build is far, far better, a good motor drive if wanted, a meter that works, etc.).

    It's a shame, too, as I have a clean 45/2 Rokkor with only this body for it (I've been paring down my "collection," so this one will probably go at some point. I'm happy with my IIIf/Jupiter 8, FE and 105/2.5, Rolleicord III and the evil D90).

    EDIT: Hold Dead Thread, Batman! This thread is so old I was in high school for the last post before today (and then I went to college and got a real job in the mean time)...

  9. #9
    fstop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    652
    Back when the cameras were new, the FE was about 3 times more than the XG series, any of them, and didn't take images any better.

    I have experience with the XGs and Nikons going back to when they were released.
    Compose,focus, shoot. Does the FE do it any better? No it doesn't.
    You were in high skewl when the post before last was made, I was there before XG and FE came out.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin