Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,758   Posts: 1,670,788   Online: 752
      
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 48

Thread: Too Sharp?

  1. #11
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,818
    Quote Originally Posted by zenrhino View Post
    Good afternoon,

    Can you think of any 35mm lenses that are too sharp?

    Thanks,

    Clint
    No.

  2. #12
    jmcd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    715
    Images
    41
    A lens can have more contrast than I like, but it can't be too sharp.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    British Columbia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    158
    Uh, someone mentioned a portrait of a lady in harsh light, tack sharp lens and Kodachrome.
    Brutal combination for a ladys portrait.
    Redeem yourself, put her into soft light and use a softar filter on your lens.

    Super sharp lenses are great, but for portraits use a quality softar filter with your lens.


    Marcus

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,094
    Images
    274
    Quote Originally Posted by Q.G. View Post
    A lens is never too sharp.
    Some people don't want to face the truth, yes.
    But a lens is never too sharp.

    Many lenses are not sharp enough.

    You can dumb down a sharp lens. If you really dare not face the truth.
    But you can never get anything good out of a 'not sharp' lens.
    Kind of a sweeping statement. I have seen plenty Holga images that dispute this statement.

    I do wish people would consider that sharpness in photography has less to do with the lens and everything to do with the mind behind the camera :rolleyes:

    I for one think that the answer of relative sharpness all depends on what you are seeing, and how you wish to communicate it. So the answer is yes, a lens can be too sharp....and the same lens can also be too soft.

    Kal
    Kal Khogali

    www.kal-khogali.com


    Visit my Photo Scrap Book

    www.shutteringeye.wordpress.com


    "Wake up, dream, and photograph what you have seen.
    Don't wake up, photograph, and dream of what could have been."

  5. #15

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    99
    "Kind of a sweeping statement." Now, that's both tautological and funny!

  6. #16
    Kvistgaard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Svendborg, Denmark
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    283
    Guess it is more a matter of the quality of the light hitting your subject?

    also, Keith Carter, TX, springs to mind - believe one of his "core tenets" is that unsharpness is as much a creative element as sharpness is.
    Søren

    "We are much more likely to act our way into a new way of thinking than think our way into a new way of acting." - R. Pascale

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,094
    Images
    274
    Quote Originally Posted by nocrop View Post
    "Kind of a sweeping statement." Now, that's both tautological and funny!
    I see your point...perhaps I should have left out the "kind of.."
    Kal Khogali

    www.kal-khogali.com


    Visit my Photo Scrap Book

    www.shutteringeye.wordpress.com


    "Wake up, dream, and photograph what you have seen.
    Don't wake up, photograph, and dream of what could have been."

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    921
    Quote Originally Posted by 23mjm View Post
    A lens too sharp?? A girl too pretty?? Having too much money?? Easter Bunny??? 4 things that don't exist. But I find that there are other factor than sharpness that go into making a great lens. 99% of the lenses have an acceptable degree of sharpness.
    Unicorn?
    Mark Layne
    Nova Scotia
    and Barbados

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    921
    Quote Originally Posted by Q.G. View Post
    A lens is never too sharp.
    Some people don't want to face the truth, yes.
    But a lens is never too sharp.

    Many lenses are not sharp enough.

    You can dumb down a sharp lens. If you really dare not face the truth.
    But you can never get anything good out of a 'not sharp' lens.
    Some 'sharp' lenses have horrid bokeh
    Mark Layne
    Nova Scotia
    and Barbados

  10. #20
    PhotoJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Regina, SK, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,222
    People forget that there are ways to de-sharpen a sharp lens. Filters with petroleum jelly; nylon under the printing lens; and so on, and so on...

    But (short of Photoshop, which doesn't really create sharpness, anyway; it creates the illusion of it) there is no way to sharpen the image of an unsharp lens.

    Mark's point about bokeh is valid, but I'm answering the question in the absence of all other criteria. A lens cannot be too sharp. If it is sharp at the expense of other important factors, the sharpness is not the problem, the lack of the other factors is the problem, and that's a fair nit to pick.
    Jim MacKenzie - Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

    A bunch of Nikons; Feds, Zorkis and a Kiev; Pentax 67-II (inherited from my deceased father-in-law); Bronica SQ-A; and a nice Shen Hao 4x5 field camera with 3 decent lenses that needs to be taken outside more. Oh, and as of mid-2012, one of those bodies we don't talk about here.

    Favourite film: do I need to pick only one?

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin