Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,915   Posts: 1,556,328   Online: 943
      
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28
  1. #1
    mweintraub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    548

    Need to choose best normal Minolta MD/MC lens

    I either bought or was gifted some Minolta gear and now I'm trying to let some gear go. I have the following bodies that I'll probably keep:

    SRT 202 (My Dad's)
    SRT Super (Converted to modern voltage - keeping unless someone give me a good offer)
    X-700

    I have a number of MD/MC/Rokkor lenses and want to limit my collection.

    I know I have:
    45mm f2
    50mm 1.4 Rokkor-PG (Dad's also, keeping no matter what)
    a 1.7s or two
    a f2 (I think I still have it)
    and a 58mm 1.4 Rokkor-X (I think it's an -X)

    So my question, what are the best (fast, f2-1.4) lenses either I listed or dont' have yet. (Yes, I would like a 1.2, but don't need to spend that much.)

  2. #2
    Christopher Walrath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Milton, DE, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,980
    Blog Entries
    29
    Images
    19
    Wirelessly posted (BBBold: BlackBerry9000/4.6.0.167 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/102 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0)


    From a lifelong Minolta MD user, you're good.

    Keep the pancake and the 1.4's.
    Last edited by Christopher Walrath; 07-21-2009 at 12:20 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    Thank you.
    CWalrath
    APUG BLIND PRINT EXCHANGE
    DE Darkroom

    "Wubba, wubba, wubba. Bing, bang, bong. Yuck, yuck, yuck and a fiddle-dee-dee." - The Yeti

  3. #3
    mweintraub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    548
    I know in the Nikkor world, the 50mm 1.8 is renound for it's sharpness at f4-f8. More so than the f/1.4, maybe marginally... but it's still there. I was wondering if the 1.7 is the same.

  4. #4
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,190
    58mm 1.4 Rokkor-X by far is the best.

    Steve
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN US
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,305
    Images
    4
    But also consider that your x700 requires an MD lens to use all it's features.

  6. #6
    mweintraub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    548
    mgb74, I think I'm OK because I use Aperture Priority 95.67% of the time. The rest is manual mode.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    268
    Out of that group, If I were keeping 2 lenses, and given the bodies you'll be using them on, I'd keep the 50mm f1.4 MC, and the 45mm f2 MD, for compatibility with X-700 program mode, and the most ultra small and light.

    If I were keeping just one of these lenses, I'd be torn between the 50mm f1.4 PG and a 50mm F1.7 MD Rokkor-X

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    268
    Body-wise, If I were you, I'd keep the SRT-Super and I'd actually sell the X-700 and replace it with either an XD-11, XD-5, or X-570. X-570s are cheap (you can generally get them on ebay for under $30) and IMHO, superior to the X-700 because Minolta changed the capacitor that was a reliability issue on the X-700, and also they replace Program mode with a really well executed metered manual mode that the X-700 lacks.

    Ironically, because most folks are not aware of this, you could probably sell your working X-700 for $10-20 more than a clean X-570 costs to buy.

  9. #9
    mweintraub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by dougjgreen View Post
    Body-wise, If I were you, I'd keep the SRT-Super and I'd actually sell the X-700 and replace it with either an XD-11, XD-5, or X-570. X-570s are cheap (you can generally get them on ebay for under $30) and IMHO, superior to the X-700 because Minolta changed the capacitor that was a reliability issue on the X-700, and also they replace Program mode with a really well executed metered manual mode that the X-700 lacks.

    Ironically, because most folks are not aware of this, you could probably sell your working X-700 for $10-20 more than a clean X-570 costs to buy.
    Hm, Interesting. I will have to look more into it.

  10. #10
    Chazzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    South Bend, IN, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,861
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by dougjgreen View Post
    Body-wise, If I were you, I'd keep the SRT-Super and I'd actually sell the X-700 and replace it with either an XD-11, XD-5, or X-570. X-570s are cheap (you can generally get them on ebay for under $30) and IMHO, superior to the X-700 because Minolta changed the capacitor that was a reliability issue on the X-700, and also they replace Program mode with a really well executed metered manual mode that the X-700 lacks.

    Ironically, because most folks are not aware of this, you could probably sell your working X-700 for $10-20 more than a clean X-570 costs to buy.
    But doesn't the X-570 lack TTL flash?
    Charles Hohenstein

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin