Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 55,958   Posts: 1,148,820   Online: 1088
      
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 54
  1. #11
    bsdunek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    736
    Images
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter de Groot View Post
    I think the smallest system would be the pentax 110. Useless but it is the smallest.
    But it was so cute! Too bad the 110 film system wasn't better.
    Bruce

    Moma don't take my Kodachrome away!
    Oops, Kodak just did!


    BruceCSdunekPhotography.zenfolio.com

  2. #12
    Jesper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Lund in the south of Sweden
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    303
    As has been said, when it comes down to size the Pentax auto 110 is hard to beat.

  3. #13
    Mark Fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,356
    Images
    127
    If you want the smallest 35mm with all those features, you must be looking for an OM4T with the associated small lenses, The 110 cameras are smaller, but getting common batteries are the least of your problems!

  4. #14
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,287
    Images
    140
    Getting film is even harder for 110 It's an obsolete format Like 116, 126, 828 etc.

    Ian

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Montgomery, Il/USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,979
    Smallest practical system will be Olympus OM's. They're compact and reasonably quiet.
    The Pen F is more compact but the sound is sharper & IMO noticeable. It's also 1/2 frame
    so to get a similar size enlargement the grain would be more obvious.
    Effective focal length of the lenses will be different be cause of the smaller format the same
    as digital sensors.
    A motorcyclist is the only one who understands why a dog rides with it's head out the window.
    "I had an idea once, it died of loneliness"--George

  6. #16
    wiltw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    410
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter de Groot View Post
    I would recommend the Olympus ME Super. I have one of those and I like it a lot. Got a nice little kit together. Only need a 24 mm wide angle lens with it. Or 35 would be nice to.
    Olympus OM-n, Pentax ME Super...you mixed them up, or are you using a home brewed b*stard unit?!

  7. #17
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,615
    Images
    56
    The Olympus OM2s also offers a "spot" metering function, although it isn't as refined as in the OM4 or OM4T.

    Matt

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    580
    OLYMPUS
    I favor the OM-1 and OM4T

  9. #19
    Rick A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    north central Pa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,264
    Images
    7
    My OM-1 and OM-4 are both smaller than my Contax 139Q, and the OM-1 weighs one ounce less with the winder-2 attached compared to the Contax with winder. If the 110 format was still viable, then the Pentax 110 would far and away beat almost everything on the market.

    Rick

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mission Viejo, California
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    664
    OM10 weighs even less - but it is a bit bigger than the OM1.

    Lots of people put 'em down but I've got 3 OM10's (along with 4 OM1's) and they are robust and handy little cams. Very cheap right now. Take great pics.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin