Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,929   Posts: 1,585,237   Online: 873
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    5stringdeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    St. Louis
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    603
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    13

    Rokkor-X Wide Angle

    Were there Rokkor-X lenses made wider than 28mm? I've seen tons of 50mm (and longer), some 28mm - but little else wider than that. I need some!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    38
    Yes. There was a 24mm, a 20mm, and maybe something wider. The 24mm is supposed to be stellar. There was also a fisheye. Of course, these don't turn up as much as 50's!

  3. #3
    flatulent1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Seattle USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,293
    KEH lists a 16mm f/2.8 Rokkor-X fisheye in both MC and MD mount.
    Also a 17mm f/4 MD, but not Rokkor-X. Not that it didn't exist.
    Fred Latchaw
    Seattle WA


    I am beginning to resent being referred to as 'half-fast'.
    Whatever that's supposed to mean.

  4. #4
    5stringdeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    St. Louis
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    603
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    13
    Thanks all!

  5. #5
    Mike Wilde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Misissauaga Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,939
    Images
    29
    Look up the Rokkor Files on Google for all things Minolta manual focus.
    my real name, imagine that.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    33
    I shot the 20 one time and was pleased with its quality. Should be worth checking out.

  7. #7
    Ralph Javins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Latte Land, Washington
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    832
    Good morning, 5 String;

    Minolta made several lenses of shorter focal length than 28mm. Back in the first half of the 1960's, when they came out with the SR-7 to replace the SR-3, they offered the 21mm lens with its external viewfinder. Why the viewfinder? Because the first 21mm lens was not of the modern retrofocus design (sort of a reversed telephoto, kind of), and its back element stuck into the path where the mirror would swing up. For that, they gave us the SR-7 with manual mirror lock-up and that external viewfinder. You can find the old 21mm lens every now and then, but getting the matching viewfinder can be a task.

    Others that I can recall from memory include the 7.5mm circular fisheye, the 16mm full-frame fisheye, the 17mm rectilinear, and the 18mm, 20mm, and 24mm lenses. I like the 24mm for use with interior shots, but that is about as short as I like to go without special consideration to possible distortion effects. As you can see, there were several lenses shorter than 28mm.

    As far as the "ROKKOR-X" lens designation is concerned, that "-X" part was something requested by the Minolta-USA people to go along with their "M-Tag Warranty Program." You might think of it as an official designation for a lens destined for "export" to North America. It may have helped with warranty claims for lenses not imported and sold by Minolta-USA. There were no real differences in the way that the lenses were built. They all were done on the same assembly line. The only possible difference (other than the obvious added engraving on the lens identification) was that the "-X" lenses for the M-Tag Warranty Program were to receive some additional quality control checking before packaging and shipping. Minolta lenses have always been good. The "-X" designation mainly meant that it had been really checked to make sure that it was good. They dropped the "-X" designation entirely in the 1980's.
    Enjoy;

    Ralph Javins, Latte Land, Washington

    When they ask you; "How many Mega Pixels you got in your camera?"
    just tell them; "I use activated silver bromide crystals tor my image storage media."

  8. #8
    5stringdeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    St. Louis
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    603
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    13

    Re: Rokkor-X Wide Angle

    Cool thanks for all that info.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    809

    Rokkor-X 21mm

    There's also a retrofocus (e.g. not requiring mirror lock up) Rokkor(-X) 21mm f/2.8 lens, it's stellar and better than the Rokkor 20/2.8. It's so good in fact it basically matches the legendary Olympus OM 21mm f/2. I have a lens test posted of these (and more) from Modern Photo at:

    http://www.edsawyer.com/lenstests/

    I have one of the Rokkor-X 21/2.8s, that I was going to convert for EOS use, but haven't yet.

    -Ed

  10. #10
    d.sge's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    16
    Here's a list of most, if not all, Rokkor lenses made starting with their wide angles, if that helps.

    Edit: I just noticed that some of their specialty lenses (like the 24/2.8 vfc) are listed on the last pages.
    Last edited by d.sge; 03-31-2010 at 10:45 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: .
    Daniel.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin