Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,669   Posts: 1,481,754   Online: 938
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austin
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    390
    Images
    11

    Cleaning marks on lenses

    I've asked this in a different form on the rangefinder forum, but I'm interested in getting a broader view on this question. I have a lens with a fine web of cleaning marks on the front element, which I am considering returning for a refund.

    What I want to know is whether there is a substantial group of people who use such lenses without problems or if such marks bother people as they do me. I figure for another $100 or so I can get a cleaner sample. But, the negatives from this lens look pretty good.

    I'd be interested to hear comments on this .

  2. #2
    Randy_Va's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    60
    If I bought a lens advertised and priced as very good quality and received one with major cleaning marks I would return it immediately. However, I have bought a couple of lenses with major cleaning marks at a DEEP discount and do not see them in my photos, I am sure that at certain angles to the sun they would show up, and there are probably other problems that I don't notice. Still my ugly 105mm 1.8 with dings and cleaning marks is my favorite lens, I did get a great deal on it though.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Valley Stream, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,216
    I agree with Randy. If the lens is as advertised, and you got it at a good price, then use it. If you feel that you've been mislead, then do what you must to return it.

    Believe me, cleaning marks don't bother the image at all except for maybe a bit of extra flare in some situations. A lens hood goes a long way to fix that and you should be using one anyway.
    Frank Schifano

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Oz
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    481
    This may sound a bit apocryphal, but I remember reading somewhere that it was the custom for early photographers to lightly sandpaper the front element of their (new) portrait lenses before putting them to use.

    Anyway, I do have some "legacy" lenses with a web of fine scratches on the front element. Some have unmentionable things lurking inside as well, but none of them appear to be affected by any of this in actual use.

  5. #5
    Rol_Lei Nut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hamburg
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,118
    Quote Originally Posted by Galah View Post
    Anyway, I do have some "legacy" lenses with a web of fine scratches on the front element. Some have unmentionable things lurking inside as well, but none of them appear to be affected by any of this in actual use.
    Though, the only way to really tell if it makes a difference would be to compare the results with those from the same lens in pristine state (hoping sample variation doesn't play a role).

    A loss of contrast often won't be noticed unless directly compared with a contrastier image.
    M6, SL, SL2, R5, P6x7, SL3003, SL35-E, F, F2, FM, FE-2, Varex IIa

  6. #6
    Andrew K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    479
    if you use a lens hood and the sun doesn't hit the fron element directly then you shouldn't have a problem-one of the best lenses we ever owned was a old Nikon 18mm that had a front element that looked like it had been sandblasted

    It was also one of the sharpest lenses you could have owned......
    A camera is only a black box with a hole in it....

    my blog...some film, some digital http://andrewk1965.wordpress.com/

  7. #7
    eSFotos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    38
    Cleaning marks on front element generally are not an issue other than slight loss of contrast.
    However, any marks on rear element will show up on the photo if stopped down.
    This is my rule of thumb for buying lenses ...
    Canon/Nikon/Contax/Mamiya/Olympus/Minolta/Praktica/Pentax/Pentacon/Zeiss/Yashica/Zorki/Kiev/Ricoh ...

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southeastern U.S.
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    550
    I agree with your comments, eSFotos.

  9. #9
    fotch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SE WI- USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,910
    Somethings "bother people as they do me" and considering you stated that the negatives look pretty good, you still are bothered by it. Spend the extra money, get a lens without cleaning marks, or you will always have some regret.

    JMHO
    Items for sale or trade at www.Camera35.com

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austin
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    390
    Images
    11
    Thanks for the replies. I paid a bit for it and now I believe there is a blob of some sort on the rear element that doesn't seem to come off with gentle brushing/blowing. I believe I'll return it and no worries cause it's from KEH! I will talk to them about it being more an "UG" than a "BGN."

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin