Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,290   Posts: 1,535,379   Online: 806
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,231
    Images
    20
    The 1.4 is a better lens, but keep the 1.8, because it's smaller and lighter and better than the 1.4 or 1.2L when reversed for macro, and you can't sell it for much.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  2. #12
    Greg Campbell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tucson, Az
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    52
    Looking at two images side by side, I seriously doubt you'd ever be able to tell the difference. Shoot your 'lowly' 1.8 and be happy!
    Flee, puny digicams, flee for your life!
    The mighty Bronicasaurus can smell your fear! ROAAARRR!!!

  3. #13
    Andrew Horodysky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    220
    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb View Post
    The 1.4 is a better lens, but keep the 1.8, because it's smaller and lighter and better than the 1.4 or 1.2L when reversed for macro, and you can't sell it for much.
    Ditto.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin