Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,940   Posts: 1,557,470   Online: 932
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    80

    Sigma Super Wide II 24mm f2.8? As good as some have said?

    I was nearly deadset on purchasing a Nikkor 24mm f2.8 AIS for my Nikon FM-2n, but came across reviews for Sigma's Super Wide II 24mm f2.8. Some reviews indicate that it's sharper than the Nikkor, albeit susceptible to flare (not unlike the earlier Nikkor N-Auto non-AI 24mm lens). I've read also that the lens exhibits less contrast, and colder colors. I like contrast. And I like vivid colors. From what I've seen too, the out of focus rendering seems somewhat harsh, similar to bokeh I've experienced with my digital Tamron 17-50 f/2.8. Does anyone have experience with the Sigma 24mm lens?

    Thanks!

    Paul

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    210
    Well Paul, I have not compared it directly to the Nikon lens. But I happily use the Super Wide II 24/2.8 (in autofocus version) on my Pentax cameras. I find it very sharp, with nice contrast and neutral colour. It has nothing to apologize by way of image quality. I don't feel it lacks any IQ compared to say, the Pentax FA 50/1.4 or the Nikon 50/1.8 AF. I will often choose it as a small, lightweight snapshot lens for a day when I don't want to carry a big kit.

    I picked up the Super Wide II after having VERY much enjoyed using a Sigma Mini-Wide 28/2.8 (manual focus) on my Nikon. The Mini-Wide and Super Wide II have very similar rendering and I recommend them both. They are also very sturdily built (mostly metal.)
    My other camera is a Pentax

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    80
    i loved the Pentax FA 50 1.4 when I owned it Thank you!!

    -Paul

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    410
    Sigma Super Wide II 24mm f2.8? Well I would recommend it and it used to be a hidden gem for bang per buck, but some now are going for silly prices....anyway I don't think anyone would be disappointed when bought at 1/3 of the price of say a 24mm Nikon.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    826

    Sigma Super Wide II

    I have an earlier metal barrel 24/2.8 Sigma lens in Konica mount and find it quite good.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    94
    Hi i have a Sigma 24mm 2.8 Super wide II in Pentax Af mount, it is a good lens sharp, at all Stops, good contrast well built, The other 24's I have are a Tamron Adaptall II which is a very sharp under rated lens, and a Nikon 24mm 2.8 AIS this is a very nice lens, and it performs very well and the most expensive of the 3

    I have found the Tamron to be the pick of the bunch, they can be had for around $60.00 with a mount and old tamron lenses are very well built. The only issue is it uses 55mm filters, the sigma and the nikon use 52mm filters

    All three lenses are good choices and you will be happy with any of them.

    Johnkpap

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    34
    I've had the Sigma Super Wide II and the Nikkor 24mm 2.8 ai-s. I liked the Sigma better, especially as I obtained it at a much better price. The Sigma has great sharpness, contrast and colors, even though the colors area little bit cooler. Built quality was nothing to write home about, however.

  8. #8
    Mick Fagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,844
    Images
    29
    I bought one brand new before your camera came out, for my Nikon FE2, I still have it and use it.

    It's an excellent lens, takes 52mm filters, has a heavily scalloped lens hood, has ½ stop detents unlike the Nikkors, and focuses the same way Nikkor lenses do.

    It isn't as good as a Nikkor, but it isn't far behind.

    Mick.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin