Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,654   Posts: 1,481,369   Online: 1101
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    19
    Images
    6

    Opinions on Takumar 135 prime vs Vivitar Series 1 Zoom

    Hi guys!

    Post #2 - here goes

    I have been assembling a few lens for my 'new' SLR, a Pentax Super ME

    I intended to go for the SMC Super Takumar primes as I have heard some really good things about them. I currently have a 28mm and a 50mm F1.4 SMC.
    I picked up a plain Takumar 135mm F2.5 recently (not realising it wasn't an SMC Super Takumar) and haven't heard any good things about it since (soft etc.)

    So... should I replace it with a SMC variant, of which there are many highly rated versions? (or maybe I should shut up and wait for my film to be developed!)

    Alternatively I have a cheap Series 1 F3.5 Vivitar 70-210 zoom arriving soon, any opinions on this? (version 2 according to
    http://www.robertstech.com/vivitar.htm

    How sharp are these compared to a prime? even if it is 'just' a Takumar 135?

    Thanks for your thoughts!!

    -Nick

  2. #2
    Neil Souch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    West Cornwall, UK.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    331
    Images
    16
    Hi Nick,

    I picked up a plain Takumar 135mm F2.5 recently (not realising it wasn't an SMC Super Takumar) and haven't heard any good things about it since (soft etc.)

    Correct 100% on that one I am afraid. It is not considered as good as the other Takumars but remember for portaits this may be nice (soft). I am currently trying to sell mine as well!

    Alternatively I have a cheap Series 1 F3.5 Vivitar 70-210 zoom arriving soon,

    I have not used the Series 1 Vivitar 70-210 but have owened / used a Vivitar Series 1 35 to something. That was certainly a nice zoom for its day. IIRC the Vivitar Series 1 zooms were highly regarded here in the UK. But they were heavy and bulky. Give the 70-210 a try, I am sure you will be impressed.

    Cheers,

    Neil.

  3. #3
    Flotsam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    S.E. New York State
    Posts
    3,221
    Images
    13
    I have no personal experience with either of those lenses.
    Maybe there is something useful here? : http://www.photodo.com/nav/prodindex.html
    That is called grain. It is supposed to be there.
    =Neal W.=

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    19
    Images
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Flotsam
    I have no personal experience with either of those lenses.
    Maybe there is something useful here? : http://www.photodo.com/nav/prodindex.html
    Thanks guys!

    I didn't see either lens there on photodo!

    Anyway I was more interested in opinion of the Tak over hard facts
    I was hoping someone would say "it's a great lens!"
    Anwyay I'll reserve judgement until I've seen what is is capable of (or not as the case may be!)

    Cheers,

    -Nick



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin