Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,321   Posts: 1,536,861   Online: 1127
      
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: Nikon F6

  1. #21
    david b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    None of your business
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,034
    Images
    30
    I think it's time to kill this thread.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,530
    Quote Originally Posted by steve simmons
    Is the review free? or is it only for subscribers? if free, why not provide a direct >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.>

    It is in the Free Section as I have previously said. You are so anxious to start a fight you don't take the time to read whatI have said. I have also repeatedly explained that I do not give a direct linkto just one article as this would not allow people to see the other articles in the same section. I have answered this many times.

    My post was only spam to people who are trying to control the availability of free info for others. Others might be interested in reading abut the F6 and the additional report from Photokina. There are also other articles in that section that might be of interest to people. Why not let folks see for themselves and make their own decision?

    steve simmons
    Yep, it would not allow the other people to see the other free articles, nor would it allow them to see the the offers for subscription. If your intention is to be truly informative, why not post the artcle here? without having to go thorugh all your rag web site to find the article.

    Once again, if you think you are being clever with your response, sorry, but many people see through this as just another advertisement disguised as a "free article."

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    368
    My comment about Brian submitting spam was in reference to his photo of the can of spam in response to my posting a free review of the new F6. His post was off topic, IMHO, and did not make a positive contribution.

    As for supporting this forum how many other mainstream US photo magazines have given support in the form of editorial mentions - June 03 and April 04 in CameraArts in the Publsher's Statement section.

    I am in favor of sharing resources and info souces. I have done so in my magazine and when someone participates in either the View Camera or the CameraArts forum and mentions another source o info I do not complain or accuse them of anything. If there are sources of info lets be open about sharing them.


    steve simmons

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,530
    Quote Originally Posted by steve simmons
    My comment about Brian submitting spam was in reference to his photo of the can of spam in response to my posting a free review of the new F6. His post was off topic, IMHO, and did not make a positive contribution.

    As for supporting this forum how many other mainstream US photo magazines have given support in the form of editorial mentions - June 03 and April 04 in CameraArts in the Publsher's Statement section.

    I am in favor of sharing resources and info souces. I have done so in my magazine and when someone participates in either the View Camera or the CameraArts forum and mentions another source o info I do not complain or accuse them of anything. If there are sources of info lets be open about sharing them.


    steve simmons
    Well, Black and White magazine just did a full interviwe of Sean and the site, including photographs from the members, and they did not have to do it as an exchange because they failed to pay their sponsorship. Ailsa, the editor of B&W Magazine in the UK, has done so, in addition she has published many members from this forum and paid them for their contribuition. Of course, she is a delight to deal with and has never, not once used this forum to advertise her magazine, as a matter of fact, I would say we all do it for her, since it is such a great magazine.
    Steve Anchell did the same, and he did so, once again, for support....so dont even go there, as far as I am concerned, you have milked your two little mentions in your rag enough.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    368
    You are my best PR agent Jorge because everytime you post incorrect info it gives me the opportuniy to correct you.

    I said maintream US magazines. The one is English, the other is defunct and used this forum to promote his magazine frequently, and B&W is a special case and no one know would consider it a mainstream US magazine. I think he has a terriic idea and does a great job but he is not in the standard loop, he dos not talk about or show how images are made, he does not do any product reviews, he is basically unknown to the major product companies, he does not do book reviews or reviews of workshops (perhaps rarely a best). We regularly do step by step phots of how images are made (traditional and digital) we review new an used equipment, do articles for photo and equipment collectors, showed how to build a darkroom and a darkroom sink, we test film and papers, etc, etc.

    Do you know of another mainstream US magazine publically offereing a review for the new F6? I so tell us and share the info.

    Yes, Jorge, your policing, if you really had any control, would limit people's access to info. To who's advantage would his be.?

    steve

  6. #26
    mobtown_4x5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Baltimore
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    244
    Steve has actually been laying fairly low for the last couple of months.
    I for one don't mind the occasional plug...

    Where things go wrong is the technique of posting a thread with a topic, "XYZ Camera, Developer", then "there is a discussion about this elsewhere" this approach has gotten a negative response several times now.

    As has probably been suggested before, maybe have a thread "ViewCamera Activities" that he could update when he thinks there may be a particular item of interest to the members of this forum.

  7. #27
    noseoil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Tucson
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,898
    Images
    17
    Insanity is doing the same thing over & over again, then expecting different results.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Århus, Denmark
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,102
    Images
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by steve simmons
    free review of the new F6
    I can't find it in the free section...? On both sites...?

    Am I blind or are you just spamming...

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,530
    Quote Originally Posted by steve simmons
    You are my best PR agent Jorge because everytime you post incorrect info it gives me the opportuniy to correct you.

    I said maintream US magazines. The one is English, the other is defunct and used this forum to promote his magazine frequently, and B&W is a special case and no one know would consider it a mainstream US magazine. I think he has a terriic idea and does a great job but he is not in the standard loop, he dos not talk about or show how images are made, he does not do any product reviews, he is basically unknown to the major product companies, he does not do book reviews or reviews of workshops (perhaps rarely a best). We regularly do step by step phots of how images are made (traditional and digital) we review new an used equipment, do articles for photo and equipment collectors, showed how to build a darkroom and a darkroom sink, we test film and papers, etc, etc.

    Do you know of another mainstream US magazine publically offereing a review for the new F6? I so tell us and share the info.

    Yes, Jorge, your policing, if you really had any control, would limit people's access to info. To who's advantage would his be.?

    steve
    You think? could be that instead of PR all you are showing is your refusal to see the truth....once again..your F6 article is nothing but spam....so far you have not corrected me....you said any other magazine, you did not say in the US. Why is the article in B&W a "special" case?....and what does it matter if PV does not longer exists, it was done....so no, I love it when you think I am doing PR for you and all everybody sees is your stuburness and refusal to see what is plain to many others here and in other forums. As I said, you want to give free info, post a direct link, or post it here...you very conveniently fail too acknowledge these points. So dont be playing the martir...nobody is buying...

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    368
    As for supporting this forum how many other mainstream US photo magazines have given support in the form of editorial mentions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>

    This came directly from one of my earlier posts. You are so anxious to try and discredit me that you are not payng attentiono what I have said.

    To cite a defunct magazine hardly does your argument any good.

    This is just another one of your attempts to keep me engaged in a debate with no logic and no end. I stand on my record. The only thing of yours I have seen was an article so badly done everyone I showed it to said trash it.

    I am done with you. I have real work to do. If people want to look at the info on our sites please do so. You can't control this Jorge.

    steve simmons

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin