I've been doing most of photography with my Zuiko 35-105mm zoom with close focus. It's not humongous, and it covers a very nice range of focal lengths for me. Soooo, I guess my answer would be "yes".
"We often think that when we have completed our study of one we know all about two, because 'two' is 'one and one'. We forget that we have still to make a study of 'and'."
-A. S. Eddington
I'd go with 35mm unless I was expecting to photograph a lot of people then I would chose the 50. If you are taking a lot of images in low light a 50mm may be better since they usually faster.
My favourite walk about street shooting lens is a Canon FD 35mm f2. with the focus set at around 10ft at round about f8 using the hyperfocal distance there's little o need to focus for grab shots.
As much as I love my 50mm f/1.4 Nikkor, I would go with the 35mm with less need
for critical focus as above, and also If I use a flash. (F2AS film camera).
Which one would you choose for carrying only one lens? Just as a tourist around for travel and sightseeing.
Geeez, not only must I agree to carry only one lens, but it has to be one of two that you pick? Thanks, but I pass. If I have to travel so light that I cannot have but one lens, then I would choose between one of these two cameras:
1) Hasselblad XPan with 45mm lens.
2) Contax TVS III with Zeiss 30-60mm zoom.
The fact is, the Contax is so compact and has so much capability that I usually have it with me no matter what else I am carrying.