Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,212   Posts: 1,532,036   Online: 1181
      
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 63
  1. #51
    CGW
    CGW is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,798
    Mechanical bodies can almost always be fixed. In the worst case, a good technician can always manufacture a part, not that machanical cameras often need new parts. It's electronic and "newer" cameras that need entire proprietary modules replaced (therefore being 100% dependant on original spares) when something goes wrong.

    Problem is finding competent repairs for any type of camera. Techs "making" parts is a bit of a fantasy outside a handful of specialists catering to luxury brands. Supplies of purely mechanical cameras are obviously shrinking due to age. Battery-dependent 35mm SLRs are thick on the ground now and usually cheap--so cheap that busted ones get pitched and replaced with another.
    Last edited by CGW; 07-18-2011 at 06:00 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #52

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Outside Boston, MA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    178
    I would look at KEH's bargain bin; aka "as-is". I got a Nikon FE2 and a Nikon FM2n for $40 each. Keep checking back. The stuff in the as-is section changes daily. I would recommend KEH "as-is" as being miles ahead of eBay in accuracy of description and value for money, which is to say "forget eBay".

  3. #53

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Montgomery, Il/USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,026
    Oh I dunno,

    Most levers can be fabricated pretty easily. Wouldn't want to attempt gears though. Plastic bits can sometimes be repaired if all the fragments are there.
    Wouldn't do it for $$$ but the stuff I use myself.
    Heavily sedated for your protection.

  4. #54

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    125
    I'd buy a nikon over an ae1. The ae1 is prone to shutter problems if it goes unused for a long time. I've purchased four ae1s and they all had slow shutters, I give up trying to find a working one.

    Nikon seems a lot more reliable. I've purchased over 20 used nikon slrs and the only issues I've ever encountered are meters being slightly off or lcds bleeding or fading.

  5. #55
    Rol_Lei Nut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hamburg
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,118
    Quote Originally Posted by CGW View Post
    H/G screens are focal length/aperture specific--really handy(?).

    YMMV but I've never had any issues with MF lenses on AF bodies. I happily use the 45/2.8 Ai-P(you've tried one, right)on an N90s-- a near-perfect street rig for me.
    Which is why I said my favourite viewfinder is a bit like an H screen "but better": A much finer grain and works perfectly with all lenses....

    Again, there's no accounting for taste. I have tried the Nikkor 45mm f/2.8: a pretty standard Tessar clone, good but nothing to get excited about. For my taste, it's also too long...

    A 35mm Summicron on a Leicaflex SL or an M6... Now there is a thing of beauty!!!
    (as far as the OP is concerned, not quite budget, though not as expensive as urban legends and the uninformed make them out to be).
    M6, SL, SL2, R5, P6x7, SL3003, SL35-E, F, F2, FM, FE-2, Varex IIa

  6. #56

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    37
    Wow thanks for all the replies you have helped a LOT im looking at ffordes and a used camera shop i just found near me, with regards AF thats not what im looking for i just dont like AF even on my DSLR i very rarely have it set to AF i like to be able to control what i want in focus

    I do want a nice lens so i am looking into cheaper cameras with nicer lenses, re: CLAing i am fairly confident in my own skills when repairing things while i have repaired only a few cameras i have a 100% success rate doing it

    when arguing electronic over fully manual i am totally a manual lover with the exception of a lightmeter which i do like to save me having to carry my Ikonphoto light meter with me

    thanks for all your help with any luck i shall be photoing a few days after pay day comes around

    kind regards
    samuel

  7. #57
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,589
    Images
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by Selidor View Post
    Girls were attracted to my silver OM-1n like moths to a flame.
    This has reminded me of a line by Humphrey Lyttelton on the BBC Radio Four programme, I'm Sorry, I haven't a clue.

    Whilst introducing a contestant he remarked "he attracts girls like bees around a magnet".


    Steve.
    "People who say things won't work are a dime a dozen. People who figure out how to make things work are worth a fortune" - Dave Rat.

  8. #58

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southern USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,769
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    Personally i think they are poor choices, less reliable, too much electronics and auto functions.

    I'd go for a Pentax Spotmatic II or F but if you want newer a KM, KX or smaller MX. I paid £25 for my Spotmatic F and it's mint Lenses are very plentiful at good prices.

    Ian
    I totally agree, the Pentax lenses are first rate. Another possiblity is the Nikon EM which allows the use of many Nikon lenses. I picked up one in mint condition for US $60 with a telephoto lens and camera bag.

    I would avoid the Minolta SR/SRT series. These cameras use a fragile thread to connect the aperture ring to the cameras built in meter. The thread passes over several pulleys. Should it break the camera is useless and repair costs more than the camera. I was given one and was shocked by this poor design.
    Last edited by Gerald C Koch; 07-27-2011 at 02:32 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man contemplates it, bearing within him the image of a cathedral.

    ~Antoine de Saint-Exupery

  9. #59

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Montgomery, Il/USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,026
    Quote Originally Posted by Gerald C Koch View Post
    I totally agree, the Pentax lenses are first rate. Another possiblity is the Nikon EM which allows the use of many Nikon lenses. I picked up one in mint condition for US $60 with a telephoto lens and camera bag.

    I would avoid the Minolta SR/SRT series. These cameras use a fragile thread to connect the aperture ring to the cameras built in meter. The thread passes over several pulleys. Should it break the camera is useless and repair costs more than the camera. I was given one and was shocked by this poor design.
    I'm not a fan of the SRT's either, but to be fair. the technology at the time still used discrete components for the meter. I've never seen a broken string where something hasn't been forced.

    FWIW the Canon AE-1 used a tungsten wire to connect elements on one side of the camera to the other. People have even broken those and they are tough.

    Olympus used thread in either the OM-1 or OM-2 as a mechanical connection to the meter.
    Heavily sedated for your protection.

  10. #60
    Diapositivo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,844
    A am not a repairer, as a layman I suppose a thread-pulley mechanism is very common wherever there is a following needle. The aperture ring, the shutter knob and the ASA knob each operate a pulley and move the following needle. If the groove of the pulley is deep enough I guess it is very, very difficult to dislodge the thread from a pulley. The thread has no workload and so it should not break easily, the design is probably sturdier than it looks, unless the thread is a rubber one, which could fail with time. If the thread is an ordinary silk or nylon thread, I would deem the entire mechanism quite dependable, as it needs no lubrication. The only thing that could make it fail is a knock so hard to dislodge a pulley, but that knock would dislodge pretty much anything, I suppose.
    Fabrizio Ruggeri fine art photography site: http://fabrizio-ruggeri.artistwebsites.com
    Stock images at Imagebroker: http://www.imagebroker.com/#/search/ib_fbr

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin