Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,736   Posts: 1,515,503   Online: 1099
      
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: 35mm scanners

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Floor-it-duh
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,099
    Images
    98

    35mm scanners

    What are we all using to scan slides and negs? Not looking to spend a fortune, I have some Kodachrome I need to get done.
    5x7 Eastman-Kodak kit / B+M 135mm Zeiss Tessar + Compur Deckel
    RB67 Pro S /50 4.5 / 90 3.8 / 180 4.5 / WLF / prism finder / polaback
    FED-2 / 50 2.8 Industar 26m / 85 f2 Jupiter-9
    Canon 300v / A2

  2. #2
    Worker 11811's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,620
    It all depends on what you intend to use the scans for.

    If you only want to scan film to post copies on the internet, a relatively cheap scanner will do.
    If you want to use your computer for digital proofing, so to speak, an expensive scanner is not needed.
    If you want to create images that you can print with your inkjet printer, say, up to 4x5 in or even 8x10 a moderately priced scanner will be all right.
    If you want to make art for framing and display or for sale, cheap scanners are right out.

    It all depends on your ultimate goal and your budget. Without going into too much detail which would go outside of the scope of this forum, my best advice is to buy the best scanner you can afford. Beyond this, the digital forum is where all the people who know the details about scanning hang out.
    Randy S.

    In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.

    -----

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/randystankey/

  3. #3
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,010
    Images
    60
    As Randy has hinted - DPUG.ORG, not here.

    Kodachrome can be challenging.

    I find scanning really frustrating.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Floor-it-duh
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,099
    Images
    98
    Yeah I've noticed.....I just wanted to post some of my Kodachrome here.

    I had some prints done of a couple of my slides and they looked fantastic. I was impressed.
    5x7 Eastman-Kodak kit / B+M 135mm Zeiss Tessar + Compur Deckel
    RB67 Pro S /50 4.5 / 90 3.8 / 180 4.5 / WLF / prism finder / polaback
    FED-2 / 50 2.8 Industar 26m / 85 f2 Jupiter-9
    Canon 300v / A2

  5. #5
    2F/2F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,008
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by j-dogg View Post
    What are we all using to scan slides and negs?
    DPUG dot org. Having been signed up here for a year, you must know that by now.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  6. #6
    maarten m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    gent belgium
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    220
    epson V600 + Vuescan.
    i scan mostly MF @ 3200dpi and prints (50x50) come out real fine!

    mm

  7. #7
    M.A.Longmore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    New York
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,830
    Images
    15
    .
    Are DPUG Members really shooting, and scanning that much film ?
    It seems that APUG Members would have the answer.
    The APUG Gallery seems to be loaded with scanned images.

    Ron
    .

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by M.A.Longmore View Post
    .
    Are DPUG Members really shooting, and scanning that much film ?
    It seems that APUG Members would have the answer.
    The APUG Gallery seems to be loaded with scanned images.

    Ron
    .
    It would seem sensible for there to be a place on the forum that allows people to solicit help preparing their analogue pictures for posting on the forum?

    Anyway - I use a drum scanner for my 'serious' stuff but bought a 'Minolta Dual Scan III' off ebay for about $100 which is almost as good for well exposed slides and most negatives. 3000dpi is more than enough for posting shots and details to forums.

    Tim

  9. #9
    MaximusM3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NY
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    756
    Images
    6
    Silverfast is key for scanning Kodachrome, with their custom profile. Word of caution: DO NOT UPGRADE TO MAC OSX LION IF YOU WISH TO KEEP USING ANY CURRENT VERSIONS OF SILVERFAST SCANNING SOFTWARE. THEY CATEGORICALLY WILL NOT WORK.

  10. #10
    Worker 11811's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,620
    I scan most of my film. I scan to .DNG files using VueScan and my Canon flatbed scanner.

    I do it for proofing purposes and to put pictures on the internet. I also use the files as digital backups for record keeping purposes.

    I scan at 2,400 DPI and scale down to the needed resolution, usually 300 DPI for printing on my inkjet printer but I'll scale that down to 72 DPI before posting on the internet.

    Occasionally, I am called upon to perform digital restoration, so to speak, on old or damaged photos. Sometimes people will ask me to scan film, slides or photos for their own purposes. On these occasions I'll scan at 4,800 DPI and scale down to the needed resolution as the situation calls.

    I would like to have a dedicated film scanner like a Nikon but my budget doesn't allow that. I don't get enough paid scanning work to make it feasible. My Canoscan 8800F flatbed isn't the most optimal thing to use. It's not accurate enough and it's fairly slow and cumbersome to do production work but it does the job.

    I don't think it's outside the scope of this forum to say that we scan film and to talk about the basic details of what we do and why but it is outside our scope when you want to talk about the details of scanning and how to do it.

    Even if you never use anything digital in your photography, this forum is in the digital domain. Therefore, some discussion of digital technology is called for, provided the focus stays on film and film technique. It's okay to discuss digital technology as long as it is treated as an adjunct to traditional methods.

    To that end, I have no problem saying that I do use a scanner and discussing general information about scanning but I leave the details to the forums where it is inside the scope of their missions statements.
    Randy S.

    In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.

    -----

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/randystankey/

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin