Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,986   Posts: 1,523,979   Online: 852
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Ricoh KR-5 III?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    12

    Ricoh KR-5 III?

    I can get this camera for a pretty good price with a Pentax 50mm lens and I am wondering if it is a good camera, there doesn't seem to be much information available on it(though I did find a manual). This would be my first film camera, and my first slr camera in general as my current camera is a Fujifilm finepix s1600. I'm trying to move away from point and shoot but I can't afford a nice dslr right now and I find film to be very interesting. Does anyone have any input on this camera? Thanks!

    Edit: I found these reviews here which seem to all be good for this camera: photographyreview.com/cat/cameras/film-cameras/35mm/ricoh/kr5-iii/prd_102957_3105crx.aspx
    Are you sure you didn't just happen upon a few bad camera's bob?
    Last edited by Visionist; 07-31-2011 at 07:45 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #2
    BobD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    California, USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    437
    My opinion:
    Ricoh's later plastic-bodied SLRs like the KR-series had nice features but poor reliability.
    In my experience, it's hard to find one that actually works these days. And, if you do find
    one, chances are it won't be working for long.

    A Pentax K1000 is a much more reliable camera which uses the same lenses as the
    Ricoh and which has endured as one of the most popular student (or newby)
    cameras of all time.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    29
    My opinion? This camera looks to be a later version of the Ricoh KR-5 Super II. I have purchased two of the latter and both of them were functional with good mirror bumpers and light seals. I also have a XR-10 that was also functional and did not need new seals. If you can get it for a good price, then I would say check it out with batteries and if it is functional, go for it.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    12
    Well it would only be 20$ or so, I bought a Minolta XG-1 that stopped working before I could even get to take any shots with it, so I'm hoping that the Ricoh would work.
    Last edited by Visionist; 07-31-2011 at 09:26 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  5. #5
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta, GA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,780
    It's worth $20 if it's in decent shape.

    I had an XR-7 I bought in college shortly after they came out and used, sometimes heavily, sometimes (like the previous 10 years) not at all, until last year when the rewind knob broke. The rest of the camera is still fine (I did have the light seals replaced once.) I bought another off eBay for $25 with a junk lens. It's my second body and I do use it a fair amount.

    In my defense I'll add that my primary 35mm body is a Pentax LX. ;-) Still, while it's a plastic toy in comparison to the solid and well built Pentax, it is nice to use and has some good features.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Cole View Post
    It's worth $20 if it's in decent shape.

    I had an XR-7 I bought in college shortly after they came out and used, sometimes heavily, sometimes (like the previous 10 years) not at all, until last year when the rewind knob broke. The rest of the camera is still fine (I did have the light seals replaced once.) I bought another off eBay for $25 with a junk lens. It's my second body and I do use it a fair amount.

    In my defense I'll add that my primary 35mm body is a Pentax LX. ;-) Still, while it's a plastic toy in comparison to the solid and well built Pentax, it is nice to use and has some good features.

    Then again, the list is large of SLR's that pale in comparison to the Pentax LX

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by BobD View Post
    My opinion:
    Ricoh's later plastic-bodied SLRs like the KR-series had nice features but poor reliability.
    In my experience, it's hard to find one that actually works these days. And, if you do find
    one, chances are it won't be working for long.

    A Pentax K1000 is a much more reliable camera which uses the same lenses as the
    Ricoh and which has endured as one of the most popular student (or newby)
    cameras of all time.
    I ended up getting a k1000 instead for 40$(56$ shipped) with a 50mm 1:2 lens and a case . I lost the auction for the Ricoh(Could have gotten it, but didn't feel confident enough spending more than 20$ with such little info available online for it)and after your post I researched the k1000 and found it to be a really great camera. I can't wait for it to get here!
    Last edited by Visionist; 08-02-2011 at 04:35 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  8. #8
    Nikon Collector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Carolina Beach, NC
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    162
    I have several Ricohs, but none as new as the one you're asking about. I also have a K1000. The XR Ricohs I have are far superior to the Pentax. The K1000 made in Japan was a fine camera, later they were made in China and less well made, the newer ones are made in Korea and are junk.

  9. #9
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta, GA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,780
    Quote Originally Posted by Nikon Collector View Post
    I have several Ricohs, but none as new as the one you're asking about. I also have a K1000. The XR Ricohs I have are far superior to the Pentax. The K1000 made in Japan was a fine camera, later they were made in China and less well made, the newer ones are made in Korea and are junk.
    My issue with the K1000, even the very first Japanese ones, is the lack of depth of field preview. To me that's an essential function that they're lacking.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin