Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,663   Posts: 1,481,663   Online: 817
      
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 55
  1. #31
    CGW
    CGW is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,798
    Quote Originally Posted by brucemuir View Post
    These days all you need is an iPhone to be a pro.
    It's true, Bruce, but here's how to recycle all that useless Canon and Nikon glass:

    http://photojojo.com/store/awesomene...one-slr-mount/

  2. #32
    brucemuir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Metro DC area, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,264
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by CGW View Post
    It's true, Bruce, but here's how to recycle all that useless Canon and Nikon glass:

    http://photojojo.com/store/awesomene...one-slr-mount/
    Come on...
    we're a few months past April 1st.

    true "awesomeness!!"

  3. #33

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Toronto ON Canada
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    547
    I'm not sure exactly what a pro camera is. I've known a number of persons whose main income was from photography and while some used totol models from several manufacturers all used what seemed like an odd mix of anything. Most of them told me it was what felt good in their hands and what the results were and not the cost of the camera that made them make a decision as to what camera to buy. Many of them did use a Rolleiflex or Rolleicord and this was about as common a denominator as there was. It seemed to be an almost standard workhorse. The other commonalities were thay each seemed to have no limited budget for tripods and most used a version of the ETR Bronica for weddings and portraits. One used the ETRS as his sole system camera and made me realize that a single system was better than multiple investments in multiple systems and the ETRs made for both a very good MF camera and a 35mm camera.

    One had an extensive range of M42 lenses so his cameras all had this mount. He used a number of Ashahi models through the Spotmatic well into the '90s. Another had a number of Leicas in the studio but almost always used the M5 and CL on shoots. I now own his CL that he used for my wedding. Another was one who standardized on the Contax/Yashica mount camera buying the Zeiss lenses but all but one body was the FX-3. He found he could not get them to break and if it did it was so inexpensive so what. One of my bodies was his daily user in and out of the studio and it still works fine.

    I concluded long ago that many professionals decided not on their systems based on camera body but on lenses offered and collected over the years.

  4. #34

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    125
    Most pros used the n90s back then.

  5. #35
    lxdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Redlands, So. Calif.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,454
    Quote Originally Posted by Pumalite View Post
    Price ws the reason they started to buy it over the F2
    Well, that and the F2 being discontinued.
    I do use a digital device in my photographic pursuits when necessary.
    When someone rags on me for using film, I use a middle digit, upraised.

  6. #36
    Pumalite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Here & Now
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,078
    I'm talking about the F3 and those years; la Nikon F neither the F2 were discontinued. As far as I am concerned; my F's, F2AS are neither discontinued because I continue using them as well as the Nikkormats
    " A loving and caring heart is the beginning of all knowledge " ~ Thomas Carlyle ~

  7. #37

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    793
    I just happened to stumble on Ken Rockwell's review of the FM3a and it's almost embarrassing the amount of superlatives he heaps on it . . . but deservingly so!

    Like a lot of folks, he got the model wrong as he uses a lower case "a" instead of a smaller font capital "A" . . . ;-)


  8. #38

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    552
    Look at the history. Nikon produced the best 35mm SLR they could with the technology available, there was no concept of pro or amateur until later. A professional photojournalist in the 60s or 70s might have an F or F2 in his bag plus a Nikkormat, with a 35mm and an 85 or 105 for portraits, maybe a 300 for sports and hire the rest as required. He'd be happy to use either camera and any other that kept his clients from thinking he was a cheapskate.

    When I assisted back in the 70s 'professional photographer' usually meant studio photographer and 35mm was only used for cheap jobs. The only people who used 35mm exclusively were newspaper men.

  9. #39

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    One hour south of the Mackinaw Bridge
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    302
    To me, the FM and FE series were pro cameras. If you were around back in the mid-1970's you'd remember what a game-changer the Olympus OM-1 was. Virtually overnight, the market changed, with smaller and lighter being "in," and big and bulky "out." A lot of pros were smitten with the new Olympus and sold their Fs' and F2s' and bought an OM-1 (if I remember correctly, UPI dropped Nikons at this time for Olympus). So the FM and FE were marketed at this time to the pro who wanted to stay with Nikon but needed a smaller, lighter camera. At least that's how I recall it.

    Jim B.

  10. #40

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Ontario
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    5

    Really?

    This question is asked so many times....

    Your gear has nothing to do with you being professional. You should only ever buy 'professional gear' for the advantages listed in the specs - whatever feature suits your need.

    How about refining the question next time, as in which Nikon camera is the most insultated, or shock resistant, or has the fastest motor drive because I am doing X with it, etc.

    Incidently, you earlier posted a question asking if the FM3a was the best 35mm MF, or something like that, did you just buy one and are feeling buyer's remorse? You don't need any convincing that the FM3a is an excellent camera.
    Last edited by tdunn81; 08-15-2011 at 08:57 AM. Click to view previous post history.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin