Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,788   Posts: 1,671,434   Online: 1096
      
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 59
  1. #31
    kivis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    224
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    8
    Akiva S.

    Nikkormat FTN, FT2, Nikon F, Nikon FE, FM3a, Leica M3

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

    My Blog



  2. #32
    Rol_Lei Nut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hamburg
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,118
    Quote Originally Posted by kivis View Post
    Bodies are about the same weight.
    Errr.....878 vs. 500 grammes (F+FTn vs. M6).
    But the main weight savings is in the lenses, where an M kit can end up weighing nearly half as much as a Nikon one.

    Using C/V bodies & lenses, the difference will probably be even greater.
    M6, SL, SL2, R5, P6x7, SL3003, SL35-E, F, F2, FM, FE-2, Varex IIa

  3. #33

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Boston
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    145
    I use a Mamiya 7 when traveling . . .

  4. #34
    Vilk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    424
    Quote Originally Posted by Rol_Lei Nut View Post
    ...an M kit can end up weighing nearly half as much as a Nikon one.
    i guess i need my morning tea--my brain is struggling with this one

  5. #35
    IloveTLRs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    ch
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,067
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Vsanzbajo View Post
    Which one do you think is a better camera overall. If you had to pick one for a trip.
    Thanks in advance.
    From a purely personal point of view, the M3. I prefer a thousand times to use a small, quiet rangefinder.
    Those who know, shoot film

  6. #36

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,006
    Images
    4
    I'd pick the Nikon F if I wanted more capability/versatility and speedier operation. I'd pick the M3 if I wanted to carry a small package. Both are high quality cameras and both companies made high quality optics, so those things would be the least of my concerns.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  7. #37
    shutterclank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Memphis, Pittsburgh, San Francisco
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    54
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    5
    M3! M3! with a 50mm or 35mm.
    Chris Schuster
    Shutterclank!

  8. #38
    kivis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    224
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by Rol_Lei Nut View Post
    Errr.....878 vs. 500 grammes (F+FTn vs. M6).
    But the main weight savings is in the lenses, where an M kit can end up weighing nearly half as much as a Nikon one.

    Using C/V bodies & lenses, the difference will probably be even greater.
    F with meterless prism - 580 grams
    M3 - 560 grams
    Akiva S.

    Nikkormat FTN, FT2, Nikon F, Nikon FE, FM3a, Leica M3

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

    My Blog



  9. #39
    kivis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    224
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    8
    My silent Nikon F

    Akiva S.

    Nikkormat FTN, FT2, Nikon F, Nikon FE, FM3a, Leica M3

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

    My Blog



  10. #40

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by Vsanzbajo View Post
    Which one do you think is a better camera overall. If you had to pick one for a trip.
    Thanks in advance.
    I see this is an old thread. But still active, so I'll pipe in.

    I love both. Which is the better camera overall? The photography world pretty thoroughly voted that to be the Nikon F. That is largely due to versatility. The Leica is unbeatable at its strengths.

    I prefer the Leica in the focal lengths I use most (35 to 50). Because of that I also prefer the M2 (or M4) to the M3.

    In spite of my preference for Leica, I think the F would be ideal for a trip if you are talking about 50mm or longer (or even w/24mm). The M3 is fabulous with 50 Summicron, but the Nikon works really well at 50mm too. The one spot where a Leica seriously trounces the F is with 35mm and that is not the strong spot for an M3).

    My answer if based on the idea of travel. The Leica is still theft bait. If somebody accidentally steals your F, they'll probably just give it back when they realize what it is. If that is not a concern, I'd choose the M3 w/50mm.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin