Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,663   Posts: 1,481,651   Online: 803
      
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 33 of 33
  1. #31

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    234
    Quote Originally Posted by Claire Senft
    Why limit yourself to what museums find fit to hang omn their walls?
    I don't limit it in any way. It's just away to emphasize that my world considers these photographs to be impotant

  2. #32
    Guillaume Zuili's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles & Paris
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,638
    Images
    216
    -Jane Evelyne Atwood : women in prison.
    -Shanta Rao : Portraits of men when they come.


    And why not for men : Araki

  3. #33

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    243
    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb
    How many years after Rejlander?
    I would put Rejlander into a different category than Hockney, as Rejlander used multi-printing techniques and copying (like H.P Robinson, Uelsmann, etc.) to create tableaus. For that matter why pick Rejlander when Henry Peach Robinson could also be used as an example?

    However, neither Robinson nor Rejlander did the same thing as Hockney. Rejlander and Robinson wanted to fool you into thinking the image was a made from a single exposure. They "built" images that emulated the look of a single exposure but could not be made unless they were constructed from multiple images. However, they went to great lengths to HIDE the fact that the image was made from separate, individual exposures.

    Hockney purposely shows you that you can't make the image without hundreds of single exposures put together to make the final image. He's purposely exploiting and showing the look and distortions of multiple exposures that mean nothing until assembled into the final image.

    He's purposely showing the assembled whole as a means to deconstruct the idea of the single exposure = single image (among many ideas contained in his images).

    Does that clarify the difference for you?

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin