Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,880   Posts: 1,520,465   Online: 982
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Printed Prints

  1. #1
    Curt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,531
    Images
    15

    Printed Prints

    This last Saturday I had the pleasure to attend the Paul Strand exhibition of photographs at the Tacoma Art Museum
    in Tacoma Washington. The photographs were not large, some being very small, and all matted and framed in white
    metal. I had been looking forward to seeing the prints since the first of the year and finally made there. The
    other showing was of Frida Kalho, her life though photographs, which included many famous photographers
    photographing great artist. This was simply spectacular.

    Several Paul Strand photographs appeared darker than I had imagined and upon asking I was told they were
    illuminated correctly. Two photographs especially bothered me. I have seen them reproduced in books and the vast
    shadow areas contain a lot of details. The two photographs in the show had no shadow details in very large areas
    of the images. At the show were two books by Strand, Photographs of the Southwest. I opened it up to the two
    photographs, walked over to them and held the book up and compared. The actual photographs were void of shadow
    detail but the book reproductions had the shadow detail. In my mind it should have been the other way around. A
    reproduction usually, but not always, would lose detail and not gain it.

    I ordered two books by Paul Strand, which are on the way, and will be eager to see the prints in the books. Anyone
    who can't get to the galleries due to location, time, or other reasons, get some books and don't feel that you are
    missing everything there is to offer. I have found that a couple of printings of an image can give you a very good
    impression. Apparently the printing is the performance as Adams would say.

    Because of the lack of quality of Verizon DSL I had to compose in text and cut and paste into the thread.
    Last edited by Curt; 05-21-2007 at 01:53 AM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: reason for look of text
    Everytime I find a film or paper that I like, they discontinue it. - Paul Strand - Aperture monograph on Strand

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,057
    The display by museums of gelatin silver prints under inadequate illumination is epidemic today. Photographers invariably printed for much higher viewing light levels, but curators defer to conservators and the lumens get severely restricted. Low value details are then obscured, just as you observed.

    When books are printed, modern controls can be applied and the process is optimized for expected viewing conditions. After attending Weston and Strand museum shows during the last few years, I agree that books are a better way to see the work. Only if a private collector is willing to display prints under "vintage" illumination levels can one more fully appreciate the images.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,066
    So the prints were illuminated "correctly" (did Strand leave instructions?), or by what standard? I think I agree with the comment about conservators' recommendations, if they are original artist produced prints.
    About the books, I have seen this in the past also. Makes me wonder if the original negs were scanned and carefully P-shopped to emulate the prints, with speculated "improvements"...

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    Quote Originally Posted by Curt View Post
    The actual photographs were void of shadow
    detail but the book reproductions had the shadow detail. In my mind it should have been the other way around.
    Dear Curt,

    I have often seen the same thing. I first became aware of this almost 40 years ago with a Bill Brandt exhibition at Dartington Hall. Since then I've been disappointed by (in particular) Ansel Adams, Karsh of Ottawa and Aleksandr Rodchenko exhibitions -- to name only the worst. In my steadily growing experience, prints in repro often raise unrealistic expectations for originals.

    Cheers,

    Roger

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    135
    Images
    23
    A few years ago I was scheduled to have a show of my photos and chose my favorite (which I was quite proud of) to have printed on the post card invitations. When I saw the postcards, I was quite humbled, as they managed to capture that elusive glow which the original only hinted at. I was petrified that anyone attending would be disappointed that the prints didn't live up to the postcard! So I went and reprinted that photo --many times--until I felt it was worthy.
    It did help me improve my printing skills...



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin