Discussions: 45,160 | Messages: 608,997 | Members: 29,920 | Online: 303 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1109 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
638 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
954 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Photographers > Fine Art Photography Techniques

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2007, 10:52 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
Martin Liew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Singapore - The Lion City
Posts: 20
Default Fine Art Photography Techniques

I have came across this website on fine art photography by David Fokos. I was truly amazed and inspired by his work.

I've also came across another photographer's website, who does the similar fine art style as David Fokos, especially their seascapes photographs.

I'd like to ask/consult the experienced photographers here, if anyone knows how to make exposures like those of David Fokos' and Håkan Strand's seascape photographs. My choice of camera is a TLR and a 35mm SLR on B&W films. I'll be using filters like Cokin 'P' system ND-8 and a HOYA ND-400 filter lens. Are these equipments good enough to make those photographs?

It's a great motivation to learn this photo-making technique. Please kindly advise. Thanks.
Martin Liew is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-22-2007, 11:11 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
climbabout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fairfield County CT
Posts: 181
Default equipment for fine photographs

One of my favorite saying is "it's not the hammer, but the person swinging it that counts". Any camera is capable of making a work of art if used properly. Your vision and technique will do more to determine the "look" of your photographs more than any piece of hardware. Looking at these 2 websites, I can make 2 immediate observations. 1 - the seascapes use a long exposure to blur the water to give it that silky look. 2- most of these photographs have only a few very graphical elements that give them a very stark simplicity, which in my opinion, enhances their beauty. Simple is almost always better than cluttered. I hope this helps.
Tim
climbabout is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-22-2007, 11:13 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
David H. Bebbington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,320
Default

I have no detailed knowledge of Fokos' work but ...

Your TLR (Mamiya? Rollei?) is without doubt good enough to use - most of Fokos' shots seem to be taken with a wide-ish standard lens. Fokos' technique seems to be to use short exposures sometimes to record detail in water, at other times to rely on a very solid tripod and use ND filters to allow longer than usual exposures to blur out water detail. If you have a 400x ND filter you will be able to use this technique even in bright light. Otherwise, Fokos seems to use a contrast filter (orange or red) and print his skies in quite strongly. A TLR is great to use with ND filters, as with an SLR you will find the viewfinder dim even with an 8x filter and totally useless with a 400x.

Regards,

David
David H. Bebbington is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-22-2007, 01:14 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
mikeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 550
Default

Your camera will be fine as long as you have a B setting, cable release and a sturdy tripod.

Thank you for bringing Strand to my attention, I haven't come across his work before. This style of photography is very popular at the moment and has been discussed several times here on apug. If you do a search for Michael Kenna, Bill Schwab as well as Fokos you'll find several threads along with references to other photographers who work in this way.

Cheers

Mike
mikeg is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-22-2007, 01:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
lee
 
lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 2,911
Default

I have some contact with David Fokos. David shoots an old Century camera with a 300mm lens last I heard. He uses lots of ND filters. The neg after development is scanned into a computer via a high end drum scanner and is worked over sometimes pixel by pixel. Sometimes images are removed and sometimes images are added but they likely are not the scene as photographed. Once the file meets David's ideas it is sent to a printer either an Epson or a Lightjet of some variety. His big image is 3 foot by 3 foot. He does make striking images.

lee\c
lee is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 08-23-2007, 04:18 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
naeroscatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Newmarket, Ontario
Posts: 215
Default

thanks for bringing up these links. this is very close to my idea of fine art photography and these artists are remarcable. Truly inspiring work.
Definitely is the person behind the camera, the vision you have that leads to the result. Mechanics are important but not crucial in getting a good picture.
Technique is important and can be learned, jut go out and shoot, over and over again; learn from your mistakes and shoot more. Damn, I wish one day I could make one picture like Fokos or Kenna. I still believe I will. Time kills me, when do I find the time since I don't shoot for a living.
__________________
Mihai Costea
“To me, every hour of the light and dark is a miracle”( Walt Whitman-Miracles)
naeroscatu is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-23-2007, 04:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
keithwms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,730
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Thanks for mentioning this work, Martin. Interesting.

After a glance through Fokos work, I would guess that in addition to NDs you may wish to consider pulling low speed film. The long exposure images look very smooth to me, maybe try delta 100 or tmax pulled in xtol or something. Just a guess, not something I do.
__________________
Keith Williams

My APUG Portfolio
Photography: keithwilliamsphoto.net
Physics: Nanodevice physics

"I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." - Thomas Jefferson
keithwms is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-23-2007, 04:47 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 84
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lee View Post
I have some contact with David Fokos. David shoots an old Century camera with a 300mm lens last I heard. He uses lots of ND filters. The neg after development is scanned into a computer via a high end drum scanner and is worked over sometimes pixel by pixel. Sometimes images are removed and sometimes images are added but they likely are not the scene as photographed. Once the file meets David's ideas it is sent to a printer either an Epson or a Lightjet of some variety. His big image is 3 foot by 3 foot. He does make striking images.

lee\c
I think he is shooting digital by now
manalishi is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-23-2007, 06:37 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Ed Sukach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 4,106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David H. Bebbington View Post
... If you have a 400x ND filter you will be able to use this technique even in bright light. Otherwise, Fokos seems to use a contrast filter (orange or red) and print his skies in quite strongly. A TLR is great to use with ND filters, as with an SLR you will find the viewfinder dim even with an 8x filter and totally useless with a 400x.
Am I missing something? "400x ND" ?? How many 'stops" is that?
__________________
Carpe erratum!!

Ed Sukach, FFP.
Ed Sukach is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 08-23-2007, 11:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
David H. Bebbington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Sukach View Post
Am I missing something? "400x ND" ?? How many 'stops" is that?
A lot, although without taking my shoes and socks off, I can't work it out! (Actually it's 8 2/3 stops). Log equivalent is 2.6 apparently. I don't own one of these filters, but they do exist. The easiest way to apply the factor would be to use a lower EI (e.g. Tri-X at ISO 0.5 instead of 200) or multiply the exposure time (1 sec. instead of 1/400). Off the cuff, I could imagine the only use for these filters is in very bright light.

Regards,

David
David H. Bebbington is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using