Discussions: 45,160 | Messages: 608,996 | Members: 29,920 | Online: 308 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1109 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
638 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
954 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Photographers > Paul Strand: Blind Woman

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2008, 02:54 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maesteg, Bridgend, UK
Posts: 9
Default Paul Strand: Blind Woman

I am to create an essay for my uni assignment called historical and contextual referencing and the module of it is timeshift. I was wondering if anybody could help me in gettin any information on a photograph by Paul Strand called "Blind Woman, New York"

thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (78.0 KB, 72 views)
lewis-richards is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 01-06-2008, 02:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maesteg, Bridgend, UK
Posts: 9
Default

oh yeah by the way sorry that the thread was name Nadar. Meant to name is Strand
lewis-richards is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 01-06-2008, 03:15 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 1,106
Default

Would suggest looking at the DVD Strand: under the darkcloth. In it, he mentions using a camera with real lens on side so that he could surreptitiously do street photography without the actual subjects being aware.
doughowk is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 01-06-2008, 04:06 PM   #4 (permalink)
Ole
 
Ole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 8,650
Blog Entries: 1
Default

I've changed the title.
__________________
-- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
Norway
Ole is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 01-06-2008, 04:36 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Curt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,650
Default

http://www.liveauctiontalk.com/free_...article_id=597

Just to start with...
__________________
Save the Cynomys ludovicianus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-tailed_Prairie_Dog
Curt is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 01-06-2008, 07:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
clay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 981
Default

I have read some discussions of this photograph that reference the irony of its creation. Supposedly Strand used a modified Graflex SLR at this time with a fake lens pasted at right angles to the real lens. This allowed him to photograph subjects who believed he was photographing something else. The irony here is that it appears the blind woman is glancing to the right. We have no real way of knowing if this is true. But if this is indeed the case, there is something nicely ironic about a photographer pretending not to see the person pretending not to see. No way now to track down the two actors in this, and all we are left with is the picture. Which is still pretty cool.
__________________
I just want to feel nostalgic like I used to.


http://www.clayharmon.net - turnip extraordinaire
clay is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 01-06-2008, 10:19 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ont, Canada
Posts: 342
Default

Mind you I do not see why a blind person's eyes have to be pointing in the direction of the nose.
The voluntary eye muscles still work even if the ocular nerve is dead. If Strand waited until a compromising image came up and then shot, I wonder at his respect of the subject.
And in today's ethical milieux, imagine sneaking such a shot and publishing.
Times were different but it was still sneaky
Regards
Bill
cowanw is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 01-07-2008, 04:10 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 4,533
Blog Entries: 23
Default

it depends on when the ocular nerve went dead as to how much voluntary control someone has over their eyes. People born blind have no control and so their eyes roam all over the place - it can be a bit disconcerting to watch if you're not aware of what's going on.
__________________
WWW.THEFLYINGCAMERA.COM
TheFlyingCamera is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 01-07-2008, 06:12 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ont, Canada
Posts: 342
Default

Exactly. So our usual movie/TV conception that blind people look sraight ahead is quite false. And our assumptions of this photograph are likely to be just as false.
Regards
Bill
cowanw is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 01-07-2008, 08:05 AM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maesteg, Bridgend, UK
Posts: 9
Default

I have jsut got hold of myself that video on paul strand, watched it, and it actually mentions about the lens on the side of the camera, quite interesting.
lewis-richards is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using