Discussions: 45,160 | Messages: 608,998 | Members: 29,920 | Online: 305 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1109 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
638 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
954 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Photographers > Tina Barney techniques of shooting "spontaneous" portraits with a 4x5

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2008, 06:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 21
Default Tina Barney techniques of shooting "spontaneous" portraits with a 4x5

Hi there,

Has anyone seen "Tina Barney: Social Studies" on the Sundance Channel a few weeks ago? The documentary had some footage of her photo shoots for her most recent book, "The Europeans."

Using a 4x5 and strobes, she is able to shoot as if using a 35mm of medium format camera. I've only been shooting 4x5 (also with electronic strobe) for a few months now but I am still perplexed to understand how she does this. If I'm not mistaken, doesn't the sitter have to stay completely still or the focus will be off?

Thanks for your help,
Paolo
pjm1289 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-21-2008, 06:30 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 12,554
Default

If you've got enough light, you can stop down to f:22 or smaller, and that's a good amount of DOF for 4x5" portraits without any need for subjects to remain absolutely still.

When DOF is razor thin, say for available light portraits with 8x10" or larger around f:5.6, I use a string between the tripod and the subject to keep the eyes in focus, and it's very reliable.
__________________
Photography-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb/photo
Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb
David A. Goldfarb is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-21-2008, 07:12 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
darr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pjm1289 View Post
Hi there,

Has anyone seen "Tina Barney: Social Studies" on the Sundance Channel a few weeks ago? The documentary had some footage of her photo shoots for her most recent book, "The Europeans."

Using a 4x5 and strobes, she is able to shoot as if using a 35mm of medium format camera. I've only been shooting 4x5 (also with electronic strobe) for a few months now but I am still perplexed to understand how she does this. If I'm not mistaken, doesn't the sitter have to stay completely still or the focus will be off?

Thanks for your help,
Paolo
I did watch the show, but if I remember correctly, Tina's Linhof was tripod mounted, she had an assistant adjust her camera/lenses, and her subjects were posed. That is not exactly how I shoot with a 35 mm.
__________________
darr almeda
http://photoscapes.com
darr is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-21-2008, 07:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 171
Default

4x5 can be used as a point and shoot even without the flash. you can use ISO400 film and shoot it wide open. under the sun you can even shoot at f/22 handheld with higher ISO film and rangefinder.
cotdt is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-21-2008, 08:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Dave Wooten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,513
Default

Dave Goldfarb's string method above is the tried and true one used by portrait photographers for the past hundred years or so...frees one from jumping under the cloth and allows you to engage the subject, eye to eye...as a child I remember a home portrait photographer reaching to my nose with the string with a big grin on his face and then POW he got me in the same big grin! It was a keeper, Mom still has that portrait-me in my cute suit with the little lamb on front...and I am now 61 years of old age.
__________________
[FONT="Arial Black"][/FONT]
Dave Wooten is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 03-21-2008, 11:50 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 21
Default

Ah okay, I've been a big fan of shallow depth of field but I can see myself sacrificing that for shapr images and spotaneity.

I just Google-d the string technique and I will definitely try it.

And yes, I remember the tripod too but I think they moved a bit. I don't quite remember but I am going to try her technique next week (without the assistant of course...)
pjm1289 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-22-2008, 03:55 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
Dave Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Middle England
Posts: 3,894
Default

Considering press photographers once used 5x4 and rattled off 6 shots in a couple of minutes without breaking into a sweat suggests that it is possible. In fact it should be easier today using electronic flash since one is freed from changing bulbs and only has to rattle a fresh film into use in a Grafmatic back.
__________________
Regards Dave.

An English Eye

Dave Miller is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-26-2008, 03:58 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 774
Default

Craig McDean uses an 8x10 and a 4x5 to shoot fashion models. Usually studio set-ups with strobes. Basically, the strobe speed is your shutter speed. All the shutter on the lens does is control the ratio of flash to ambient in your exposure. So the fast (short time) of the strobe firing freezes the subject. If the subject moved a great deal, then you could get ghosting, or fuzzy edges.

Just because a 4x5 lens has an f22 setting, doesn't mean you need to use it. However, some people are easier to work with than others. When you find a possibly more difficult subject, then use a setting giving greater DOF. When you have someone better at taking direction, then open up that aperture. Just as an example, I have done many shots at f8.0 or f11.0, instructing the talent to only move along the plane of focus, one example here. That shot was with a two light set-up, ambient room (studio) light, and f8.0 on a 135mm lens (Fuji Astia 100F Quickload); shutter speed was 1/8 second to allow the room lighting to burn in more.

To set-up a shot like that, you can either draw a line upon which the talent can move, or you can give them reference points along the sides of where they are standing (outside camera lens view. If you want to do headshots, then have your talent (subject) sit in a chair to keep the distance better controlled. If you use swing on the camera at set-up, then you can have your talent align or more along a line at an angle to the camera.

Then you can stand behind the camera, or like I prefer to one side of the camera. What I prefer is interacting with the talent, and when a stance is to my liking I will trip the shutter. Then another Quickload (or Readyload) and the next shot can happen at a short interval. While the pace is still slower than with rollfilm cameras, it can go quickly if you have an assistant to handle the film packets. I find that the relaxed pace makes for a unique interaction that brings out something different in the final image. While I have tried this technique with regular people, I have far better results with actors, actresses, and models; all of whom take directions well and somewhat understand what I am trying to achieve.

Ciao!

Gordon Moat Photography
HerrBremerhaven is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-26-2008, 07:49 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: third stone from the sun
Posts: 199
Default

Here's a picture I shot on 4x5 (kodak 400nc). I used 14 individual metz 60 series strobes and about 3,000 watts of hotlights. The picture was made during magic hour which warranted an exposure of 1/400th of a second. I actually had to power the metz's down inorder to achieve a shorter exposure. If I was as loaded as Ms. Barney I'd probably replace them with a 10k broncolor set-up...but that wouldn't be as much fun now would it?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg bmx.jpg (276.7 KB, 65 views)
frotog is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-26-2008, 08:51 AM   #10 (permalink)
 
David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 12,554
Default

Cool shot. I bet the Metz strobes probably stopped the bicycle in midair more easily than a Broncolor setup would, unless you could do it with lots of heads at low power to keep the flash duration short (like Lois Greenfield does with her dancers in midair).
__________________
Photography-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb/photo
Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)-- http://www.echonyc.com/~goldfarb
David A. Goldfarb is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using